Wobbly watchdogs
How many times have you read a story about ethics or campaign finance that quotes “non-partisan” groups such as the Center for Responsive Politics, Common Cause, Democracy 21, Public Citizen and the Center for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington? (A Nexis search I just ran for “non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics” brings up 421 hits.)
Well, Roll Call unmasks the partisan stripes (or rather, spots) of these wobbly watchdogs. For those who don’t have subscriptions, here’s a snippet:
Since Republicans took control of Congress a decade ago, leading government watchdog groups have relentlessly pursued allegations of ethics broaches and fundraising abuses against GOP leaders ranging from retiring Rep. Nick Smith of Michigan to Majority Leader Tom DeLay of Texas.
But the groups have gone comparatively easy on Democrats – and a recent look through campaign-finance figures shows that officials of five leading money-in-politics watchdogs have given money almost exclusively to Democrats since 1994, when Republicans took over Congress.
According to the nonpartisan PoliticalMoneyLine, officials at Common Cause, the Center for Responsive Politics, Democracy 21, Public Citizen and the Center for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington have donated a total of $62,000 to Democrats over the past decade.
During the same period, the watchdog groups have given just $2,000 to Republicans…Said one House GOP leadership aide: “It seems ‘nonpartisan watchdog’ is Latin for ‘active Democrat contributor.’ Why they continue to get quoted as independent observers blows my mind.”
There’s more the story could have added. According to one Hill source, nearly all of these watchdog groups are funded with money from the hyper-partisan Bush-basher George Soros: Public Campaign, $1.2 million; Public Citizen, $100,000; Common Cause, $600,000; Democracy 21, $250,000.
Moreover, a board member for the Center for Responsive Politics gave money to one of Nancy Pelosi’s Leadership PACs during the same time they were silent about her ethically-challenged practice of operating two leadership PACs. And another board member for the Center for Responsive gave money to corruptocrats Rep. Dan Rostenkowski and Sen. Carol Mosely-Braun.
So, who’s watching the watchdogs? Daniel Okrent (public@nytimes.com) and Michael Getler (ombudsman@washpost.com), fetch!
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Nancy Pelosi Explains Why Obama Flip-Flopped on Super PACs
February 9, 2012 10:08 PM by Doug Powers
50 CommentsFormer Democrat Rep. Regrets Vote for Obamacare Due to Contraceptive Coverage
February 7, 2012 03:40 PM by Doug Powers
75 CommentsPelosi Doubles Down: Gingrich Won’t Be Elected — There is Something I Know
January 24, 2012 11:06 PM by Doug Powers
119 CommentsPelosi to Republicans: Come to Work and Help Us Fix the Results of Bush’s Failed Policies!
January 6, 2012 02:34 PM by Doug Powers
66 CommentsPelosi’s Office Denies Daughter’s Retirement Claim
December 29, 2011 10:56 PM by Doug Powers
54 CommentsPelosi Spends the Holidays Sacrificing on Behalf of Her Beloved 99%
December 26, 2011 01:02 PM by Doug Powers
89 Comments
Categories: Campaign finance,Nancy Pelosi
Babalu Blog
» Greece is Burning
Patterico
» NYT hails the safety net: Poor hardest hit

AmSpecBlog
» Weekend Political Wrap-Up
JustOneMinute
» I Guess I'm Still Stuck On Stupid
The Hill
» Rep. Ron Paul not conceding Maine vote
















Add your opinion
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.