And Oatsie said…

By Michelle Malkin  •  June 24, 2004 07:51 AM

Ok, I love Peggy Noonan as much as anyone, but enough with the name-dropping Reagan funeral columns already…

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Media

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On June 24th, 2004 at 8:59 am, Frank J. said:

    First!

    Ha! I got to do it to someone else.

    I feel dirty…

    Oh, and be nice to Noonan.

  2. #2
    On June 24th, 2004 at 9:03 am, Quas said:

    Thank YOU!
    I’m glad somebody said it.

  3. #3
    On June 24th, 2004 at 9:07 am, Matthew said:

    Peggy has earned the slack that I’m cutting her. Such a passionate defender of the real RR legacy gets time off for good behavior…

  4. #4
    On June 24th, 2004 at 9:22 am, Jess said:

    I see no problem with a little “name dropping”, how else should she tell this (particular) story? Sure, there have been plenty of essays about Reagan, the man and his legacy, but the purpose of this one was different. Now if you want to hear useless name dropping listen to Rush’s Monday monologue.

  5. #5
    On June 24th, 2004 at 10:09 am, Jack said:

    Rush was on vacation this past Monday. Did you mean after the funeral?

    Peggy gives those of us who love President Reagan a chance to be at the funeral, to overhear the discussions, and to actually take part in the ceremony. I didn’t mind the name dropping, it is an isolated event (over 3 columns).

  6. #6
    On June 24th, 2004 at 10:49 am, McGehee said:

    Rush had been at Bush 41′s birthday party over the weekend, the day before the parachute jumps. From what I heard, the big event for him was having his picture taken with Gorbachev.

  7. #7
    On June 24th, 2004 at 11:11 am, Expertise said:

    My god.

    I said the exact same thing. I understand Reagan being loved and everything, and I admired him too. But the way she keeps harping about him, you’d think they were lovers or something.

    It’s time to move on, Noonan.

  8. #8
    On June 24th, 2004 at 12:35 pm, William Meisheid said:

    Of all the pundits who have written about Reagan since his death she was probably the closest to him. I believe her (I hope temporary) fixation on Reagan’s passing shows that even the best and most articulate of us can lose our perspective at times, especially when it relates to something so near and dear to our hearts. Something for all of us who “pundate” to keep in mind.

  9. #9
    On June 24th, 2004 at 12:52 pm, Jacket said:

    I adore you both!

    IMHO, she’s the only blond out there who gives you a run for the money!

  10. #10
    On June 24th, 2004 at 1:29 pm, wildjusticelgf said:

    Peggy was simply setting the scene. Besides, it was kind of a give-away that she’d be dropping names when she entitled her piece “What I Saw at the Funeral” (IIRC) … and then went ahead and … told us what and who she saw at the funeral. Part 3 wasn’t as strong or as enjoyable as Parts 1 & 2, but of the 30 or so Reagan pieces I’ve read, Noonan’s is among the finest and most heartfelt. Jack Dunphy’s (at NRO) was a delight, as was my main man’s Jay Nordlinger.

    OK, enough rambling from me. Michelle, congrats on your superb blog. Beauty and brains. What a combination.

  11. #11
    On June 24th, 2004 at 4:11 pm, Pamela said:

    Yes, but, she’s still one great speech writter.

    I have been a fan of yours for a long time. Usually read your editorials on Opinion Alert at Townhall.com. I am thrilled to have stumbled onto your blog site.

  12. #12
    On June 24th, 2004 at 4:31 pm, K. said:

    I read the first two funeral columns, and I couldn’t take another.

    It’s not just the name-dropping that bothers me. There is also the way Noonan always has to write about clever remarks that she made, and the appreciative, we-wish-we’d-said-that reaction of everyone who heard her.

  13. #13
    On June 24th, 2004 at 4:45 pm, Dave Munger said:

    Jacket: Coulter and Ingrahm are blonde, so the whole giving Michelle a run for her money thing has more of that factor in it than you said. Man, that’s awkward wording, glad it’s someone else’s site I’m putting it on. Are there any redheads giving Michelle a run for her money? I don’t think so. Peggy Noonan is like Ann Coulter for your Mom.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Global Warmists Seek to Flush Out ‘Denier’ Meteorologists

January 30, 2012 04:09 PM by Doug Powers

104 Comments

Cloudy with a chance of fiery death

Editor’s Note of the Day

January 18, 2012 02:36 PM by Michelle Malkin

82 Comments

Left Kind of Upset With Politifact’s ‘Lie of the Year’ Choice

December 20, 2011 01:41 PM by Doug Powers

73 Comments

“Throw grandma from the cliff” blowback

MTV Ditches ‘Choose or Lose’ Slogan

December 19, 2011 10:59 AM by Doug Powers

100 Comments

Chose and lost?

Al Sharpton: Parody We Much

December 11, 2011 03:33 PM by Doug Powers

38 Comments

Lib media journos punked by fake SEIU press release

December 7, 2011 09:41 AM by Michelle Malkin

31 Comments

Professor: ‘Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer’ Promotes Bullying

December 5, 2011 04:39 PM by Doug Powers

136 Comments

Bad Santa


Categories: Media

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook