Michelle Malkin » Sandy Berg(l)er?

Sandy Berg(l)er?

By Michelle Malkin • July 19, 2004 08:46 PM

Whoa.

Well..,

It’s.
Not.
Like.
It’s.
Anything.
New.

Stefan notes the Kerry connection. (Via Captain’s Quarters)

OTB muses: “Perhaps his dog ate it.”

Hmmm. More likely culprit: Socks the Cat.

Update: Let the Sandy Berger Photoshopping begin! First out of the gate: Blogs of War.

More: Mark Levin in April noted some damning info that Berger wasn’t able to stuff down his pants.

The Washington Post puts the story on page A2.

From the comment board, “Overheated in Texas” writes:

Let’s recap: In representing a former US president in the course of the 9/11 Commission’s investigation, Berger surreptitiously takes highly classified documents from a federal institution, destroys many of them, and creates a gap in the evidence relevant to an investigation into the worst act of mass murder (not to mention act of war) on US soil.

What’s Berger’s lawyer have to say about possible criminal charges? His client knew that taking his own notes out of the secure reading room was a “technical violation of Archive procedures, but it is not all clear to us this represents a violation of the law.”

It must depend on what your definition of “taking” is. I’m guessing his shirt and pants did the taking and poor Sandy was just an innocent bystander.

Update III: See Chris Muir’s “Day by Day” cartoon. He’s the anti-Garry Trudeau. Gotta love it. And more Berger grilling via Silent Running and friends. Plus, reader Walt Tester says I missed another example for the Clinton Lost Stuff File: here.

Posted in: Sandy Berger

Printer Friendly

comments (80)

trackbacks (26)

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

Trackback URL

Comments

« Older Comments

#2715

On July 20th, 2004 at 10:40 pm, Gmac said:

Jack:

“If there were actual justice in the world, they would land Berger in a federal prison as well.”

One can only hope my friend, but the record of top-level prosecution of corrupt federal officials in the past decades is abysmal. As long as Sandy has a former / popular president laughing along with him don�t bet that he�s going to end up in the pokey with his now famous trousers around his ankles.

No doubt the left was not fond of welfare reform but aside from that Clinton could then, and can still, get all of those leftists to hit their knees in seconds flat. He is a powerful personality who cannot be denied. It�s not like he is going to headline the DNC Mayday celebrations later this month because the left hates him. Who is, still, the head of the DNC? Clinton�s boy. Do you think John Kerry has the guts to say, �hit the bricks� to Terry? Don�t bet on it. Clinton owns the DNC and he knows he isn�t going to be in any jeopardy with the Berger scandal. Why not laugh when another sucker is going to take a fall for you?

Sandy, meet my friend Susan McDougal�..