childs bedroom furniture

discount

Those wacky democrats have lost/destroyed some important classified documents *accidentally* again! Gosh, those crazy kids would lose their heads if they weren’t screwed on, wouldn’t they?! So, here’s the latest: former President Clinton’s national sec…

He’s still telling reporters that he was not guilty of criminal wrongdoing, as he pleads guilty to misdemeanor theft of classified documents. Just how you inadvertantly stuff classified documents in your pants, socks, and portfolio is a little bit bey…

“If there were actual justice in the world, they would land Berger in a federal prison as well.”

One can only hope my friend, but the record of top-level prosecution of corrupt federal officials in the past decades is abysmal. As long as Sandy has a former / popular president laughing along with him don’t bet that he’s going to end up in the pokey with his now famous trousers around his ankles.

No doubt the left was not fond of welfare reform but aside from that Clinton could then, and can still, get all of those leftists to hit their knees in seconds flat. He is a powerful personality who cannot be denied. It’s not like he is going to headline the DNC Mayday celebrations later this month because the left hates him. Who is, still, the head of the DNC? Clinton’s boy. Do you think John Kerry has the guts to say, “hit the bricks” to Terry? Don’t bet on it. Clinton owns the DNC and he knows he isn’t going to be in any jeopardy with the Berger scandal. Why not laugh when another sucker is going to take a fall for you?

Sandy, meet my friend Susan McDougal…..

The Democrats certainly want the story to end tonight, and given the charmed lives they have led recently it could happen. Nonetheless, this is a serious crime, and PR alone may not be enough to bury this one.

I agree Berger very well may have been trying to hide something big from the Clinton era, but it seems to me the idea was to begin to make nice-nice with Kerry. The port and airport security-related documents almost certainly were used in a Kerry policy address within 24 hours of their theft, and the hubris as well as criminality that reveals is astonishing. I laughed when the leftists began to belatedly point fingers at Clinton–they never really liked him, anyway.

This one will follow the SOBs to the convention. If there were actual justice in the world, they would land Berger in a federal prison as well.

You are a worker-bee and you must follow the rules. Sandy and the gang are the authors of the rules and therefore don’t have to follow them.

Actually the perception of illegal activity these days is so bass-ackwards that a president who goes to war with the approval of the OVERWHELMING majority of the Senate is somehow in violation of some non-prosecutable, yet, media sellable crime and a National Security Advisor who knowingly smuggles classified documents out of a secure facility is defended by a former president as a slob and his actions rate a big “laugh”.

I have no doubt that you and others in similar positions deal with classified material as if lives depend on it because, well, they do. People like you probably do what you do because of your commitment to an oath that you took to protect this information. You also know that there WILL be a price to pay if you fail in your obligation. Sandy Berger, and John Deutsch obviously do not have the same fear of consequences. They don’t feel obligated by their oath. They don’t think of the possible loss of life caused by their actions. To them it is a game….it’s all politics and anything is acceptable when politics are involved. Your pay grade doesn’t afford you the luxury of irresponsibility. That’s what it all boils down to and I doubt anyone in power will take any actions to change this norm.

Good luck at LA.

I am inclined to think that that is what _should_ happen. But it should happen to Berg(l)er and should have happened to Deutsch as well.

Please believe that everyone I personally know at Los Alamos is very careful about classified materials, and we are all genuinely shocked that some of our own would show such reckless disregard for clear rules of operation.

The only advice I have for Mr. Burger is…

Could be that Sandy was just being a starf***er and trying to curry favor with Kerry in hopes of being brought on in a Kerry administration, but, the risks he took were so enormous that there had to be something more. I have no doubt that, as he was already taking a risk, he probably figured he could kill two birds with one stone. Cover some Clinton problems while pilfering documents useful to the next possible leader of the, soon to be, not so free world sounds like a good idea when you’re already going for broke.

Unfortunately I’m sure that this whole story is going to be over before we ever get the truth. If in fact Sandy’s statements tonight are true and that he, to paraphrase, “dealt with these issues, completely, in October 2003”. It sounds to me that Sandy feels that the case is closed. I’m afraid that with the track record we see, wherein politicians need not answer for crimes, Sandy may be sleeping without fear of any prosecution.

I’d like to hear from any active duty military personnel who deal with classified documents on a regular basis. What do you think would happen to you if you walked out of your command with even one, Secret, TS, or codeword document stuffed in your trousers? How quick do you think you’d be prosecuted?

It really is sickening!

But not so fast. Information Berger pilfered ended up in a John Kerry policy speech the very next day. I agree that Berger was a toady for Clinton, but he was doing what he did best: currying favor with the man he wants to be the next president.

This will be the equivalent of Watergate–before the presidentail wannabe even gets his party’s nomination.

No big shock with the news that Berg(l)er is stepping down. “Mr. Berger does not want any issue surrounding the 9/11 commission to be used for partisan purposes. With that in mind he has decided to step aside as an informal adviser to the Kerry campaig…

No big shock with the news that Berg(l)er is stepping down. “Mr. Berger does not want any issue surrounding the 9/11 commission to be used for partisan purposes. With that in mind he has decided to step aside as an informal adviser to the Kerry campaig…

How long ago did Berger steal these documents? Could it be that he realized ‘Slick Willy’ told another fib, and wanted to ditch the evidence before anyone else added 2 + 2?

Just a thought, because WHERE THERE’S SMOKE – SOMEONE’S PANTS ARE ON FIRE!!