<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hasta la vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/21/hasta-la-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/21/hasta-la-vista/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:04:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Immigration Blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/21/hasta-la-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-3215</link>
		<dc:creator>The Immigration Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=231#comment-3215</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;THE NEW HAMPSHIRE MODEL OF ENFORCEMENT&lt;/strong&gt;

The Washington Post catches up with one of my heroes, New Ipswich, N.H., police chief Garrett Chamberlain, who is using trespassing laws to get a handle on illegal immigration in his town. If only we had more DHS officials who...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>THE NEW HAMPSHIRE MODEL OF ENFORCEMENT</strong></p>
<p>The Washington Post catches up with one of my heroes, New Ipswich, N.H., police chief Garrett Chamberlain, who is using trespassing laws to get a handle on illegal immigration in his town. If only we had more DHS officials who&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PDN</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/21/hasta-la-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-3213</link>
		<dc:creator>PDN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 03:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=231#comment-3213</guid>
		<description>Surge:

Ok. I admit I made assumptions. Never the less, I didn&#039;t just cast aspersions, I also noted that you JUMBLED legal and illegal together (I did not say you didn&#039;t include illegal and legal).  You really haven&#039;t adequately responded to the separate costs of illegal immigration as cited by  Mr. Kotthoff. So far, everyone seems to agree with you that legal immigrants are a net plus.  The only area of disagreement is on illegal aliens.  Because you haven&#039;t really addressed as a separate issue the costs of Illegal aliens, it is hard not to wonder if you have a hidden agenda.  By the way --- I have not decided yet whether I think we should have open borders but fewer benefits, or closed borders and full benefits.  Maybe you made assumptions also?

In true debate comraderie,

PDN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surge:</p>
<p>Ok. I admit I made assumptions. Never the less, I didn&#8217;t just cast aspersions, I also noted that you JUMBLED legal and illegal together (I did not say you didn&#8217;t include illegal and legal).  You really haven&#8217;t adequately responded to the separate costs of illegal immigration as cited by  Mr. Kotthoff. So far, everyone seems to agree with you that legal immigrants are a net plus.  The only area of disagreement is on illegal aliens.  Because you haven&#8217;t really addressed as a separate issue the costs of Illegal aliens, it is hard not to wonder if you have a hidden agenda.  By the way &#8212; I have not decided yet whether I think we should have open borders but fewer benefits, or closed borders and full benefits.  Maybe you made assumptions also?</p>
<p>In true debate comraderie,</p>
<p>PDN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surge</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/21/hasta-la-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-3212</link>
		<dc:creator>Surge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2004 19:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=231#comment-3212</guid>
		<description>&quot;I have noticed that those who believe latinos were robbed of the southwest have a tendency to use certain talking points when argueing about the cost/benefits of illegal immigration: in point of fact they do not distinguish between legal and illegal but just say immigrants. Your talking points also jumble legal and illegal together. I submit to you that you probably don&#039;t care at all about illegal european or asian aliens, only latino. Given this bias, and the fact that you think you are answering the arguements about the costs of illegal aliens with data about legal immigrants, I don&#039;t think you want to find the truth about costs at all but have a hidden agenda about taking back what you believe was stolen. Unfortunately, bitterness only hurts the person who is bitter.&quot; PDN

I&#039;ve noticed people like you who can&#039;t make a valid argument tend to resort to personal attacks and assumptions about one&#039;s beliefs and views, in order to justify your invalid and wrong views.

I&#039;ve EXPLICITYLY stated both legal and illegal immigration is beneficial to the U.S.  I advocate for immigrant rights here in Chicago, and work closely with Polish and Filipino immigrants, as well as Latinos.

Also, please take the time to read the reports I have posted here.  It covers the BENEFITS of immigration, LEGAL or ILLEGAL, at the local, state and national level.

And please stop making assumptions about people you do not know.  You know what they say about people who ASS U ME!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I have noticed that those who believe latinos were robbed of the southwest have a tendency to use certain talking points when argueing about the cost/benefits of illegal immigration: in point of fact they do not distinguish between legal and illegal but just say immigrants. Your talking points also jumble legal and illegal together. I submit to you that you probably don&#8217;t care at all about illegal european or asian aliens, only latino. Given this bias, and the fact that you think you are answering the arguements about the costs of illegal aliens with data about legal immigrants, I don&#8217;t think you want to find the truth about costs at all but have a hidden agenda about taking back what you believe was stolen. Unfortunately, bitterness only hurts the person who is bitter.&#8221; PDN</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed people like you who can&#8217;t make a valid argument tend to resort to personal attacks and assumptions about one&#8217;s beliefs and views, in order to justify your invalid and wrong views.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve EXPLICITYLY stated both legal and illegal immigration is beneficial to the U.S.  I advocate for immigrant rights here in Chicago, and work closely with Polish and Filipino immigrants, as well as Latinos.</p>
<p>Also, please take the time to read the reports I have posted here.  It covers the BENEFITS of immigration, LEGAL or ILLEGAL, at the local, state and national level.</p>
<p>And please stop making assumptions about people you do not know.  You know what they say about people who ASS U ME!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TXLonghorn_Mike</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/21/hasta-la-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-3211</link>
		<dc:creator>TXLonghorn_Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2004 17:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=231#comment-3211</guid>
		<description>It is utterly ridiculous what our country is doing regarding illegal immigration. An earlier post mentioned the Dallas Morning News article saying 68 percent of Americans said our immigration polict was too lax and ineffective. I live outside of Dallas and read that same article which continued on to say over 85 percent of Texans and over 87 percent of Americans oppose illegal immigration and any kind of amnesty program.
Does the administration listen? No. Do the Democrats (Kerry/Edwards) listen? No. People are wondering what GW Bush&#039;s second term legacy will be- I fear that a total opening of the borders will be that legacy. Maybe not &quot;amnesty&quot; per se, but as close as he could possibly get to it. I think 9/11 is the only reason Bush didn&#039;t do this in his first term. In 2005/06 after re-election I think he will make this a centerpiece of his domestic policy.
I think John Kerry is missing a pretty golden opportunity here. If he came out against illegal immigration and could convince the people he wouldn&#039;t flip flop on it after being elected. Oops I just went too far I guess. I would vote for a Democrat if I believed he gave a darn about border security.
There are anywhere from 9 to 20 million illegals in the USA right now. The fact that estimates vary so widely is scary in and of itself. Every year Texas spends billions for them and gets in back from its citizens via one of the highest real estate property tax rates in the nation. 
It only shows the short-sightedness of minority politicians who don&#039;t come out in favor of enhanced border security. Lower skilled workers of color, followed by lower skilled rural white workers are clearly the ones most effected by mass illegal immigration. Even in this economic recovery the NY Times laments actual wages decreasing. One of the main reasons is clearly illegal immigration keeping blue collar wages low. 
For those liberals out there that see this as a southern/southwestern issue and not a national one: have you heard of interstate highways? Nearly 10% of Georgia and Tennessee are now Hispanic. Undocumented nationals are flocking to Atlanta and Nashville. 
The chief in Michele&#039;s post is in New Hampshire. This is clearly a national threat. 
Look at what illegal immigration is doing in Europe: in 2002 65% of rapes in Norway were committed by illegal Middle Eastern immigrants. Paris and London both have a permanent underclass of illegals that now resent the French and British citizens there. How long before Los Angeles, Dallas, Phoenix, etc. have that? Or do they already?
If I were running for office my proposal would be as such: any undocumented worker would have 180 days to leave the US. Upon day 181 I would use the national guard, state police, local police, Border Patrol, even federal agencies and/or the military. This is where the ACLU would denounce me as &quot;draconian&quot;, La Raza calls me &quot;racist&quot;, MALDEF calls it &quot;ethnic cleansing&quot; etc.
The illegals captured after the 181 days would be returned to their &quot;mother&quot; countries and not be allowed the option to legally immigrate to the US in the future. I would also deduct $100,000 for any foreign aid paid to that country as a fee for the removal of that illegal alien.
The illegals that left in the first 180 days would be allowed to legally immigrate to the country, but would not be eligible for any government entitlement save social security (only if they contribute to it). Legal immigration would be limited to 100,000 annually to ease population and they would be required to be able to speak at the minimum basic conversational English.
Any takers??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is utterly ridiculous what our country is doing regarding illegal immigration. An earlier post mentioned the Dallas Morning News article saying 68 percent of Americans said our immigration polict was too lax and ineffective. I live outside of Dallas and read that same article which continued on to say over 85 percent of Texans and over 87 percent of Americans oppose illegal immigration and any kind of amnesty program.<br />
Does the administration listen? No. Do the Democrats (Kerry/Edwards) listen? No. People are wondering what GW Bush&#8217;s second term legacy will be- I fear that a total opening of the borders will be that legacy. Maybe not &#8220;amnesty&#8221; per se, but as close as he could possibly get to it. I think 9/11 is the only reason Bush didn&#8217;t do this in his first term. In 2005/06 after re-election I think he will make this a centerpiece of his domestic policy.<br />
I think John Kerry is missing a pretty golden opportunity here. If he came out against illegal immigration and could convince the people he wouldn&#8217;t flip flop on it after being elected. Oops I just went too far I guess. I would vote for a Democrat if I believed he gave a darn about border security.<br />
There are anywhere from 9 to 20 million illegals in the USA right now. The fact that estimates vary so widely is scary in and of itself. Every year Texas spends billions for them and gets in back from its citizens via one of the highest real estate property tax rates in the nation.<br />
It only shows the short-sightedness of minority politicians who don&#8217;t come out in favor of enhanced border security. Lower skilled workers of color, followed by lower skilled rural white workers are clearly the ones most effected by mass illegal immigration. Even in this economic recovery the NY Times laments actual wages decreasing. One of the main reasons is clearly illegal immigration keeping blue collar wages low.<br />
For those liberals out there that see this as a southern/southwestern issue and not a national one: have you heard of interstate highways? Nearly 10% of Georgia and Tennessee are now Hispanic. Undocumented nationals are flocking to Atlanta and Nashville.<br />
The chief in Michele&#8217;s post is in New Hampshire. This is clearly a national threat.<br />
Look at what illegal immigration is doing in Europe: in 2002 65% of rapes in Norway were committed by illegal Middle Eastern immigrants. Paris and London both have a permanent underclass of illegals that now resent the French and British citizens there. How long before Los Angeles, Dallas, Phoenix, etc. have that? Or do they already?<br />
If I were running for office my proposal would be as such: any undocumented worker would have 180 days to leave the US. Upon day 181 I would use the national guard, state police, local police, Border Patrol, even federal agencies and/or the military. This is where the ACLU would denounce me as &#8220;draconian&#8221;, La Raza calls me &#8220;racist&#8221;, MALDEF calls it &#8220;ethnic cleansing&#8221; etc.<br />
The illegals captured after the 181 days would be returned to their &#8220;mother&#8221; countries and not be allowed the option to legally immigrate to the US in the future. I would also deduct $100,000 for any foreign aid paid to that country as a fee for the removal of that illegal alien.<br />
The illegals that left in the first 180 days would be allowed to legally immigrate to the country, but would not be eligible for any government entitlement save social security (only if they contribute to it). Legal immigration would be limited to 100,000 annually to ease population and they would be required to be able to speak at the minimum basic conversational English.<br />
Any takers??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KB</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/21/hasta-la-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-3210</link>
		<dc:creator>KB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2004 06:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=231#comment-3210</guid>
		<description>Ok, here&#039;s a post that actually addresses the point of this blog:

The Tucson Border Patrol sector releases, on average, 75-80 illegals, all OTM&#039;s (other than Mexicans) every week. They get a piece of paper by which they promise to appear at their nearest immigration office within a month, and promise to show up for court. 

Now considering that virtually none of these people are eligible to remain in the US and face removal if they bother to go to court, how many do you think show up? And that&#039;s just one, single BP sector. 

How many come to commit crimes, or turn to crime (they have no right to work.)  How many gave false identities? How many are criminals, and gave false identities, thereby avoiding arrest or one of the few and far between detention beds? 

And how many, after successfully evading immigration for say five years, and have settled comfortably into their lives in the US with little fear of the migra, will howl and scream bloody murder when a broken tailight or driving without a license thrusts them under the eyes of an immigration agent working in a jail? 

When they profess ignorance about the long-standing deportation order, and cry about the two or three US citizen children they sired, and the wife, parents and 2 or three other kids they sent for via smuggler, who is huddled at home, because they too are illegal? 

And then the newspaper plasters his puppy-dog mug on the front page of the paper with the headline, &quot;American dream shattered for hard-working immigrant!&quot; And the story about how his kids have asthma/learning disabilities/the sniffles/ that only US health care can cure (at taxpayer expense.) 

And some senator blusters about how immigration is picking on fine, upstanding would-be citizens, and calls for immigration to leave him alone, and let him live a normal life with his adorable family? 

And when the employer, who whines about him being the &quot;best worker they ever had&quot; (despite paying him minimum wage for a job that paid three times that 10 years ago) and letters to the editor come in, demanding that immigration find the &quot;real criminals&quot; or how it&#039;s &quot;racist&quot;, or pointing out how immigration could go to any number of street corners and pick up illegals if they wanted to. 

Or, of course, the thousands of illegals from Europe, Asia, Central America, Mexico, Africa and everywhere else in the world) many of whom have been arrested and released, or ignored, or skipped out on a ridiculously low bond a sanctimonious immigration judge imposed to ensure the illegal&#039;s &quot;freedom&quot; while waiting for the hearing date two years down the road at which time he will be ordered removed, or the beneficiary of sanctuary policies, or the result of lack of detention) who murder, rob, rape and commit all manner of felonies and misdeameanors against US citizens, residents and other illegal aliens.

Nope, releasing thousands of illegals into the US isn&#039;t any big deal or harmful to this country on so many levels &#039;tall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, here&#8217;s a post that actually addresses the point of this blog:</p>
<p>The Tucson Border Patrol sector releases, on average, 75-80 illegals, all OTM&#8217;s (other than Mexicans) every week. They get a piece of paper by which they promise to appear at their nearest immigration office within a month, and promise to show up for court. </p>
<p>Now considering that virtually none of these people are eligible to remain in the US and face removal if they bother to go to court, how many do you think show up? And that&#8217;s just one, single BP sector. </p>
<p>How many come to commit crimes, or turn to crime (they have no right to work.)  How many gave false identities? How many are criminals, and gave false identities, thereby avoiding arrest or one of the few and far between detention beds? </p>
<p>And how many, after successfully evading immigration for say five years, and have settled comfortably into their lives in the US with little fear of the migra, will howl and scream bloody murder when a broken tailight or driving without a license thrusts them under the eyes of an immigration agent working in a jail? </p>
<p>When they profess ignorance about the long-standing deportation order, and cry about the two or three US citizen children they sired, and the wife, parents and 2 or three other kids they sent for via smuggler, who is huddled at home, because they too are illegal? </p>
<p>And then the newspaper plasters his puppy-dog mug on the front page of the paper with the headline, &#8220;American dream shattered for hard-working immigrant!&#8221; And the story about how his kids have asthma/learning disabilities/the sniffles/ that only US health care can cure (at taxpayer expense.) </p>
<p>And some senator blusters about how immigration is picking on fine, upstanding would-be citizens, and calls for immigration to leave him alone, and let him live a normal life with his adorable family? </p>
<p>And when the employer, who whines about him being the &#8220;best worker they ever had&#8221; (despite paying him minimum wage for a job that paid three times that 10 years ago) and letters to the editor come in, demanding that immigration find the &#8220;real criminals&#8221; or how it&#8217;s &#8220;racist&#8221;, or pointing out how immigration could go to any number of street corners and pick up illegals if they wanted to. </p>
<p>Or, of course, the thousands of illegals from Europe, Asia, Central America, Mexico, Africa and everywhere else in the world) many of whom have been arrested and released, or ignored, or skipped out on a ridiculously low bond a sanctimonious immigration judge imposed to ensure the illegal&#8217;s &#8220;freedom&#8221; while waiting for the hearing date two years down the road at which time he will be ordered removed, or the beneficiary of sanctuary policies, or the result of lack of detention) who murder, rob, rape and commit all manner of felonies and misdeameanors against US citizens, residents and other illegal aliens.</p>
<p>Nope, releasing thousands of illegals into the US isn&#8217;t any big deal or harmful to this country on so many levels &#8216;tall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PDN</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/21/hasta-la-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-3209</link>
		<dc:creator>PDN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2004 02:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=231#comment-3209</guid>
		<description>Surge:

I have noticed that those who believe latinos were robbed of the southwest have a tendency to use certain talking points when argueing about the cost/benefits of illegal immigration:  in point of fact they do not distinguish between legal and illegal but just say immigrants.  Your talking points also jumble legal and illegal together.  I submit to you that you probably don&#039;t care at all about illegal european or asian aliens, only latino.  Given this bias, and the fact that you think you are answering the arguements about the costs of illegal aliens with data about legal immigrants, I don&#039;t think you want to find the truth about costs at all but have a hidden agenda about taking back what you believe was stolen.  Unfortunately, bitterness only hurts the person who is bitter.

PDN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surge:</p>
<p>I have noticed that those who believe latinos were robbed of the southwest have a tendency to use certain talking points when argueing about the cost/benefits of illegal immigration:  in point of fact they do not distinguish between legal and illegal but just say immigrants.  Your talking points also jumble legal and illegal together.  I submit to you that you probably don&#8217;t care at all about illegal european or asian aliens, only latino.  Given this bias, and the fact that you think you are answering the arguements about the costs of illegal aliens with data about legal immigrants, I don&#8217;t think you want to find the truth about costs at all but have a hidden agenda about taking back what you believe was stolen.  Unfortunately, bitterness only hurts the person who is bitter.</p>
<p>PDN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DiggersRealm : Digger Speaks</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/21/hasta-la-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-3214</link>
		<dc:creator>DiggersRealm : Digger Speaks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2004 01:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=231#comment-3214</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;10 Illegals Aliens Freed Because Immigration Didn&#039;t Want Them&lt;/strong&gt;

You know, this lack of enforcement of our immigration laws is one of the subjects that pisses me off about the Bush administration. Last week 10 illegal immigrants were released because US Immigration didn&#039;t want them. here&#039;s an excerpt on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>10 Illegals Aliens Freed Because Immigration Didn&#8217;t Want Them</strong></p>
<p>You know, this lack of enforcement of our immigration laws is one of the subjects that pisses me off about the Bush administration. Last week 10 illegal immigrants were released because US Immigration didn&#8217;t want them. here&#8217;s an excerpt on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onecent</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/21/hasta-la-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-3208</link>
		<dc:creator>onecent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2004 01:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=231#comment-3208</guid>
		<description>&quot;General Jonathan Wainwright praised the men of the 200th and 515th units (Southwest U.S., mostly Latino, Guard Units who fought in the Pacific during WWII) saying that &quot;they were the first to fire and the last to lay down their arms and only reluctantly doing so after being given a direct order.&quot;

Hey, Surge, they were American citizens you are citing.  Hispanics have always distinguished themselves in the armed forces, same with Native Americans. They are citizens of long standing after all. Want to give us some numbers on Mexican national serving in our armed forces? They can,you know. But, that&#039;s not what illegals are here for or the committment they want to make to us?  Next catastrophic event by terrorists, I&#039;m not counting on illegal Mexican brigades to save me.

Here&#039;s some insight for you first hand, as New Mexico is my home state, Hispanics - those legal Americans of many generations here - resent illegals for all of the same reasons we all do. This isn&#039;t an ethnic issue.  Illegal immigration is a form of identity theft.  It is hijacking the space, culture and order of another&#039;s home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;General Jonathan Wainwright praised the men of the 200th and 515th units (Southwest U.S., mostly Latino, Guard Units who fought in the Pacific during WWII) saying that &#8220;they were the first to fire and the last to lay down their arms and only reluctantly doing so after being given a direct order.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hey, Surge, they were American citizens you are citing.  Hispanics have always distinguished themselves in the armed forces, same with Native Americans. They are citizens of long standing after all. Want to give us some numbers on Mexican national serving in our armed forces? They can,you know. But, that&#8217;s not what illegals are here for or the committment they want to make to us?  Next catastrophic event by terrorists, I&#8217;m not counting on illegal Mexican brigades to save me.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s some insight for you first hand, as New Mexico is my home state, Hispanics &#8211; those legal Americans of many generations here &#8211; resent illegals for all of the same reasons we all do. This isn&#8217;t an ethnic issue.  Illegal immigration is a form of identity theft.  It is hijacking the space, culture and order of another&#8217;s home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Kotthoff</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/21/hasta-la-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-3207</link>
		<dc:creator>James Kotthoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=231#comment-3207</guid>
		<description>Nice try Surge but I suggest you go look at the FAIR report on the cost of ILLEGAL immigration in Arizonia which takes into account both studies you quote.
And from the economic stand point you missed the basic fact that a higher supply of labor creates a lower wage which in turn creates a lower demand for goods and services. Granted more labor resources allow for more output but only when the cost of labor is lower I.E. lower wages and fewer benefits. Which in turn would create a lower demand for goods and services (less money to spend). Which in turn would create less of a demand for labor (less jobs). So we sit in a situation of more labor resources driving labor cost down...driving demand for goods and services down...driving demand for labor down. This is especially true in less skilled positions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice try Surge but I suggest you go look at the FAIR report on the cost of ILLEGAL immigration in Arizonia which takes into account both studies you quote.<br />
And from the economic stand point you missed the basic fact that a higher supply of labor creates a lower wage which in turn creates a lower demand for goods and services. Granted more labor resources allow for more output but only when the cost of labor is lower I.E. lower wages and fewer benefits. Which in turn would create a lower demand for goods and services (less money to spend). Which in turn would create less of a demand for labor (less jobs). So we sit in a situation of more labor resources driving labor cost down&#8230;driving demand for goods and services down&#8230;driving demand for labor down. This is especially true in less skilled positions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surge</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/21/hasta-la-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-3206</link>
		<dc:creator>Surge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 23:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=231#comment-3206</guid>
		<description>Serge continually, and I expect deliberately, equates &quot;Illegals&quot; with &quot;Hispanics&quot; Whatever good some native-born Texan grunts did in Vietnam 35 years ago, is automatially credited to some border-running criminals in 2004, because they are of the same racial origin (not Raza, race). I don&#039;t need the obvious, here.&quot; Bruce

Actually, it&#039;s Caucasian-Americans who have continually link Latinos and illegal immigration, and totally ignore the rampant illegal immigration of Europeans (from the former Soviet Republics, Slavic nations, etc.).

Also, Mexicans, illegal and &quot;Manifest Destiny&quot; American citizens not only fought for the U.S. since Civil War, but they&#039;re combat deaths are disproportionate to their numbers in the U.S. military (In Vietnam, 4.9%  enlisted, 19.8% died in combat).

A few grunts, huh?  I&#039;m more than positive that you COMPLETELY LACK the same strength, pride and fortitude these patriots had to fight for your right to express your twisted opinion.

I&#039;m sure you would not be willing to  die for you beliefs like these heroes did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge continually, and I expect deliberately, equates &#8220;Illegals&#8221; with &#8220;Hispanics&#8221; Whatever good some native-born Texan grunts did in Vietnam 35 years ago, is automatially credited to some border-running criminals in 2004, because they are of the same racial origin (not Raza, race). I don&#8217;t need the obvious, here.&#8221; Bruce</p>
<p>Actually, it&#8217;s Caucasian-Americans who have continually link Latinos and illegal immigration, and totally ignore the rampant illegal immigration of Europeans (from the former Soviet Republics, Slavic nations, etc.).</p>
<p>Also, Mexicans, illegal and &#8220;Manifest Destiny&#8221; American citizens not only fought for the U.S. since Civil War, but they&#8217;re combat deaths are disproportionate to their numbers in the U.S. military (In Vietnam, 4.9%  enlisted, 19.8% died in combat).</p>
<p>A few grunts, huh?  I&#8217;m more than positive that you COMPLETELY LACK the same strength, pride and fortitude these patriots had to fight for your right to express your twisted opinion.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you would not be willing to  die for you beliefs like these heroes did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/21/hasta-la-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-3205</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 23:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=231#comment-3205</guid>
		<description>Serge continually, and I expect deliberately, equates &quot;Illegals&quot; with &quot;Hispanics&quot; Whatever good some native-born Texan grunts did in Vietnam 35 years ago, is automatially credited to some border-running criminals in 2004, because they are of the same racial origin (not Raza, race). I don&#039;t need the obvious, here.

I&#039;ve had enough of being attacked and challenged my hispanic racist imports, and their fifth-column support, in my own country.

There isn&#039;t any point we reach, in my opinion, in which these things get better on their own for Americans. We&#039;ve seen the behavior involved here, it is consistant time and time again. These people require someone be made the loser here, and that being necessary for their satisfaction, I propose they be made the losers. We need to turn a deaf ear to this horsehockey from these folk, and their native enablers, and throw &#039;em all out. I don&#039;t care if some of these folk are nice individuals. Just as many of our folk are nice individuals, we will get by just dandy on available niceness supplies. What they are doing as a people is exceedingly *not nice*, you owe nothing to people who desire to lay such a thing to your doorstep. Boot &#039;em all out. Continue taking down candidates with the ballot until they do what we tell them to do about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serge continually, and I expect deliberately, equates &#8220;Illegals&#8221; with &#8220;Hispanics&#8221; Whatever good some native-born Texan grunts did in Vietnam 35 years ago, is automatially credited to some border-running criminals in 2004, because they are of the same racial origin (not Raza, race). I don&#8217;t need the obvious, here.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had enough of being attacked and challenged my hispanic racist imports, and their fifth-column support, in my own country.</p>
<p>There isn&#8217;t any point we reach, in my opinion, in which these things get better on their own for Americans. We&#8217;ve seen the behavior involved here, it is consistant time and time again. These people require someone be made the loser here, and that being necessary for their satisfaction, I propose they be made the losers. We need to turn a deaf ear to this horsehockey from these folk, and their native enablers, and throw &#8216;em all out. I don&#8217;t care if some of these folk are nice individuals. Just as many of our folk are nice individuals, we will get by just dandy on available niceness supplies. What they are doing as a people is exceedingly *not nice*, you owe nothing to people who desire to lay such a thing to your doorstep. Boot &#8216;em all out. Continue taking down candidates with the ballot until they do what we tell them to do about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surge</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/21/hasta-la-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-3204</link>
		<dc:creator>Surge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 23:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=231#comment-3204</guid>
		<description>&quot;First the difference between GDP and GNP is GNP includes overseas production by American companies where GDP only looks at domestic production a very big difference.
You seem fond of quoting from one site and one report..
So we have studies that ended over 10 years ago. And we have a legal immigration rate of about 1 million people a year and an illegal immmigration rate of at least that. So from the time of the latest study you quote we have added at least 20 million people to the workforce ( I say at least 20 million because that doesn&#039;t include minor children who have grown up).
Nice try but I don&#039;t see where you have refuted any arguments yet&quot; James Kotthoff

From the most comprehensive study on the effects of immigration &quot;The New Americans&quot; by the National Academies of Science:

&quot;This baseline analysis focuses first and foremost on immigration&#039;s direct effect on the economy through the addition of workers to the labor force. At the most basic level, immigration increases the supply of labor in the economy. More labor means more goods and services being produced, so that national output (GDP) rises.&quot;

And since the 2000 U.S. Census shows the immigrant population has increased exponentially, you can exponentially increase the benefits of legal and illegal immigration!

Want the empirical evidence? 

Read: http://books.nap.edu/books/0309063566/html/137.html#pagetop

I&#039;ve got plenty of information &amp; resources to back up arguments.  I haven&#039;t seen much back up from you or others in this blog to try to prove your arguments.

Oh, and for those that were curious about my citizenship status, I&#039;m an American citizen of Mexican descent, born in the U.S. to hard-working, legal AND illegal immigrant parents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;First the difference between GDP and GNP is GNP includes overseas production by American companies where GDP only looks at domestic production a very big difference.<br />
You seem fond of quoting from one site and one report..<br />
So we have studies that ended over 10 years ago. And we have a legal immigration rate of about 1 million people a year and an illegal immmigration rate of at least that. So from the time of the latest study you quote we have added at least 20 million people to the workforce ( I say at least 20 million because that doesn&#8217;t include minor children who have grown up).<br />
Nice try but I don&#8217;t see where you have refuted any arguments yet&#8221; James Kotthoff</p>
<p>From the most comprehensive study on the effects of immigration &#8220;The New Americans&#8221; by the National Academies of Science:</p>
<p>&#8220;This baseline analysis focuses first and foremost on immigration&#8217;s direct effect on the economy through the addition of workers to the labor force. At the most basic level, immigration increases the supply of labor in the economy. More labor means more goods and services being produced, so that national output (GDP) rises.&#8221;</p>
<p>And since the 2000 U.S. Census shows the immigrant population has increased exponentially, you can exponentially increase the benefits of legal and illegal immigration!</p>
<p>Want the empirical evidence? </p>
<p>Read: <a href="http://books.nap.edu/books/0309063566/html/137.html#pagetop" rel="nofollow">http://books.nap.edu/books/0309063566/html/137.html#pagetop</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got plenty of information &#038; resources to back up arguments.  I haven&#8217;t seen much back up from you or others in this blog to try to prove your arguments.</p>
<p>Oh, and for those that were curious about my citizenship status, I&#8217;m an American citizen of Mexican descent, born in the U.S. to hard-working, legal AND illegal immigrant parents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digger</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/21/hasta-la-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-3203</link>
		<dc:creator>Digger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 22:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=231#comment-3203</guid>
		<description>Surge,

I don&#039;t care what that report says.

When you have a job opening and only 2 people apply you have less room to negotiate their pay than when you have a job opening and 1000 people apply.

Anyone who believes that a bunch of illegal immigrants have no effect on wages is just full of crap.

Also anyone who believes that crap has never actually run a business with employees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surge,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care what that report says.</p>
<p>When you have a job opening and only 2 people apply you have less room to negotiate their pay than when you have a job opening and 1000 people apply.</p>
<p>Anyone who believes that a bunch of illegal immigrants have no effect on wages is just full of crap.</p>
<p>Also anyone who believes that crap has never actually run a business with employees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrazyFool</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/21/hasta-la-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-3202</link>
		<dc:creator>CrazyFool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 22:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=231#comment-3202</guid>
		<description>I dont give a rats whisker about the &#039;costs&#039; verses &#039;benefits&#039; of ILLEGAL aliens.

Its really very simple.

They are here in violation of federal laws.

The people who hire them do so in violation of federal laws.

Illegal aliens are not &#039;law abiding&#039; by definition.

There *is* a legal process for foreigners to immigate to the United States.  There is a legal process to seek refuge status (another loophole).

If you dont like it, change the law.  DONT ignore the law or selectively enforce the law - that violates the &#039;Rule of Law&#039; which we live under.

nuff said.

Stop trying to blur the distinction between immigration and illegal ALIENS.  Illegal aliens are *NOT IMMIGRANTS*!  They are, at most, ILLEGAL VISITORS.  They have not been granted immigration status and they have no legal standings.

I consider immigrats to be those who have legally immigrated and followed the procedure, had a background check, interview, and have been granted a immigration-class visa by the INS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont give a rats whisker about the &#8216;costs&#8217; verses &#8216;benefits&#8217; of ILLEGAL aliens.</p>
<p>Its really very simple.</p>
<p>They are here in violation of federal laws.</p>
<p>The people who hire them do so in violation of federal laws.</p>
<p>Illegal aliens are not &#8216;law abiding&#8217; by definition.</p>
<p>There *is* a legal process for foreigners to immigate to the United States.  There is a legal process to seek refuge status (another loophole).</p>
<p>If you dont like it, change the law.  DONT ignore the law or selectively enforce the law &#8211; that violates the &#8216;Rule of Law&#8217; which we live under.</p>
<p>nuff said.</p>
<p>Stop trying to blur the distinction between immigration and illegal ALIENS.  Illegal aliens are *NOT IMMIGRANTS*!  They are, at most, ILLEGAL VISITORS.  They have not been granted immigration status and they have no legal standings.</p>
<p>I consider immigrats to be those who have legally immigrated and followed the procedure, had a background check, interview, and have been granted a immigration-class visa by the INS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surge</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/21/hasta-la-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-3201</link>
		<dc:creator>Surge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 22:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=231#comment-3201</guid>
		<description>&quot;Most illegals offer no allegiance to the United States and in a bind will not stand with her.&quot; Martin aka Blogbat

Wrong.

&quot;General Jonathan Wainwright praised the men of the 200th and 515th units (Southwest U.S., mostly Latino, Guard Units who fought in the Pacific during WWII) saying that &quot;they were the first to fire and the last to lay down their arms and only reluctantly doing so after being given a direct order.&quot;


http://www.houstonculture.org/hispanic/memorial.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Most illegals offer no allegiance to the United States and in a bind will not stand with her.&#8221; Martin aka Blogbat</p>
<p>Wrong.</p>
<p>&#8220;General Jonathan Wainwright praised the men of the 200th and 515th units (Southwest U.S., mostly Latino, Guard Units who fought in the Pacific during WWII) saying that &#8220;they were the first to fire and the last to lay down their arms and only reluctantly doing so after being given a direct order.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.houstonculture.org/hispanic/memorial.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.houstonculture.org/hispanic/memorial.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
