Comments on: Selective disclosure policy http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/27/selective-disclosure-policy/ news and commentary from a conservative perspective Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:09:33 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: premature-ejaculation 5506 http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/27/selective-disclosure-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-4656 premature-ejaculation 5506 Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:05:24 +0000 http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=274#comment-4656 <strong>premature-ejaculation 5506</strong> premature-ejaculation 5506

]]> By: Notes & Musings http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/27/selective-disclosure-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-4654 Notes & Musings Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:19:07 +0000 http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=274#comment-4654 <strong>One Out of Three Ain't Bad</strong> Last Sunday the New York Times ran a disgusting story about a creature named Amy Richards who was expecting triplets, but decided three was just too many, so she aborted two of them. "Selective pregnancy reduction". Yes, they have a... One Out of Three Ain’t Bad

Last Sunday the New York Times ran a disgusting story about a creature named Amy Richards who was expecting triplets, but decided three was just too many, so she aborted two of them. “Selective pregnancy reduction”. Yes, they have a…

]]> By: Notes & Musings http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/27/selective-disclosure-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-80081 Notes & Musings Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:19:07 +0000 http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=274#comment-80081 <strong>One Out of Three Ain't Bad</strong> Last Sunday the New York Times ran a disgusting story about a creature named Amy Richards who was expecting triplets, but decided three was just too many, so she aborted two of them. "Selective pregnancy reduction". Yes, they have a... One Out of Three Ain’t Bad

Last Sunday the New York Times ran a disgusting story about a creature named Amy Richards who was expecting triplets, but decided three was just too many, so she aborted two of them. “Selective pregnancy reduction”. Yes, they have a…

]]> By: Xrlq http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/27/selective-disclosure-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-4648 Xrlq Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:35:44 +0000 http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=274#comment-4648 Beinanto = Beninato Beinanto = Beninato

]]> By: Xrlq http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/27/selective-disclosure-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-4647 Xrlq Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:35:16 +0000 http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=274#comment-4647 Anyone know who's behind the imnotsorry.net site? Some of this stuff seems almost self-parodying. Any chance it's a hoax? A whois search reveals a certain Patricia Beinanto, of Richmond, Virginia. Does this name ring any bells? Hoax or no, I'd encourage all creative writers of the blogosphere to submit stories of their own for publication on the site. They won't take entries where you admit you aborted the kid just to get at the boyfriend, but aside from that, anything goes. The more outrageous, the better. Male bloggers with obviously male names should consider using pseudonyms. Anyone know who’s behind the imnotsorry.net site? Some of this stuff seems almost self-parodying. Any chance it’s a hoax? A whois search reveals a certain Patricia Beinanto, of Richmond, Virginia. Does this name ring any bells?

Hoax or no, I’d encourage all creative writers of the blogosphere to submit stories of their own for publication on the site. They won’t take entries where you admit you aborted the kid just to get at the boyfriend, but aside from that, anything goes. The more outrageous, the better. Male bloggers with obviously male names should consider using pseudonyms.

]]> By: Martin aka Blogbat http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/27/selective-disclosure-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-4646 Martin aka Blogbat Wed, 28 Jul 2004 05:41:49 +0000 http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=274#comment-4646 No, you have to be kidding me, the NYT simply took a Liberal at their word? If we ever decided to make a documentary in the vein of Robert Greenwald's, "OutFoxed", I can imagine more than enough material for a two-parter. Maybe it's time for 'BadTimes'... No, you have to be kidding me, the NYT simply took a Liberal at their word? If we ever decided to make a documentary in the vein of Robert Greenwald’s, “OutFoxed”, I can imagine more than enough material for a two-parter. Maybe it’s time for ‘BadTimes’…

]]> By: Patterico's Pontifications http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/27/selective-disclosure-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-4653 Patterico's Pontifications Wed, 28 Jul 2004 04:56:02 +0000 http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=274#comment-4653 <strong>I'm Too Busy Being a Prominent Abortion Rights Activist to Buy Big Jars of Mayonnaise at Costco</strong> The blogosphere has discovered that the author of that New York Times op-ed on using abortion as "selective reduction" is in fact a fairly prominent abortion rights activist. New York Times editors say they didn't know when they published the... I’m Too Busy Being a Prominent Abortion Rights Activist to Buy Big Jars of Mayonnaise at Costco

The blogosphere has discovered that the author of that New York Times op-ed on using abortion as “selective reduction” is in fact a fairly prominent abortion rights activist. New York Times editors say they didn’t know when they published the…

]]> By: Brennan Stout http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/27/selective-disclosure-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-4645 Brennan Stout Wed, 28 Jul 2004 04:45:49 +0000 http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=274#comment-4645 Oops, I had the wrong story. Here is the correction that the NY Times ran for their error. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/05/opinion/06editors-note.html?ex=1091073600&en=6d633d7d4a2967f1&ei=5070 "An Op-Ed article on Tuesday about Iraq's foreign debt should have more fully disclosed the background of its author, Mark Medish. Mr. Medish, an international lawyer and former Treasury official, represents corporations that are owed money by Iraq." - 11/05/2003 The best part of the story is that it was caught by a blogger. http://hippercritical.typepad.com/hipp/2003/11/ny_times_disclo.html Oops, I had the wrong story. Here is the correction that the NY Times ran for their error.
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/05/opinion/06editors-note.html?ex=1091073600&en=6d633d7d4a2967f1&ei=5070

“An Op-Ed article on Tuesday about Iraq’s foreign debt should have more fully disclosed the background of its author, Mark Medish. Mr. Medish, an international lawyer and former Treasury official, represents corporations that are owed money by Iraq.” – 11/05/2003

The best part of the story is that it was caught by a blogger.
http://hippercritical.typepad.com/hipp/2003/11/ny_times_disclo.html

]]> By: Brennan Stout http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/27/selective-disclosure-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-4644 Brennan Stout Wed, 28 Jul 2004 04:40:48 +0000 http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=274#comment-4644 The NY Times has a history of publishing 'news' accounts that do not qualify the author's or the person in the story's personal background. I cannot recall the specific case, but there was an Op/Ed written in late 2001 by a lawyer about a specific case regarding Enron/Worldcom. The bio notation just reported that the writer was a lawyer, but in actuality the writer was one of the lawyers on a team that was filing lawsuits against Enron and Worldcom. The NY Times has a history of publishing ‘news’ accounts that do not qualify the author’s or the person in the story’s personal background.

I cannot recall the specific case, but there was an Op/Ed written in late 2001 by a lawyer about a specific case regarding Enron/Worldcom. The bio notation just reported that the writer was a lawyer, but in actuality the writer was one of the lawyers on a team that was filing lawsuits against Enron and Worldcom.

]]> By: JEF http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/27/selective-disclosure-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-4643 JEF Wed, 28 Jul 2004 04:22:27 +0000 http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=274#comment-4643 Crazyfool, I didn't know about silent scream but it sounds like a short. I was talking about a full length documentary. My sister is a nurse and she told me about a saline abortion she inadvertantly saw as she was delivering some meds to an operating room. The doctor had inserted the syringe into the baby through the womb. The handle of the syringe was waggling all around as the baby was thrashing around in the womb. Stuff like this would even have no blood but is even spookier and sickening than the gore. If a movie was made and shown everywhere (like at college campuses etc after lawsuits forcing them to accept it on equal basis with left wing flicks like f911) maybe abortion would become the medically necessary, rare procedure it was supposed to be in the first place. Crazyfool, I didn’t know about silent scream but it sounds like a short. I was talking about a full length documentary. My sister is a nurse and she told me about a saline abortion she inadvertantly saw as she was delivering some meds to an operating room. The doctor had inserted the syringe into the baby through the womb. The handle of the syringe was waggling all around as the baby was thrashing around in the womb. Stuff like this would even have no blood but is even spookier and sickening than the gore. If a movie was made and shown everywhere (like at college campuses etc after lawsuits forcing them to accept it on equal basis with left wing flicks like f911) maybe abortion would become the medically necessary, rare procedure it was supposed to be in the first place.

]]> By: jimbo http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/27/selective-disclosure-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-4642 jimbo Wed, 28 Jul 2004 03:19:58 +0000 http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=274#comment-4642 The thing I don't get: as an abortion activist, is she so far gone that she thinks publishing this sort of story will really persuade others to her position? I mean, I used to be a wishy-washy "think abortion is wrong but don't want to ban it" sort, but stories like this are inexorably pushing me towards a "only if the mother's life is threatened" position. Is anyone going to read this and think, "Yeah, I guess killing two babies is no big deal when stacked up against having to move to Staten Island." What are these people thinking? The thing I don’t get: as an abortion activist, is she so far gone that she thinks publishing this sort of story will really persuade others to her position? I mean, I used to be a wishy-washy “think abortion is wrong but don’t want to ban it” sort, but stories like this are inexorably pushing me towards a “only if the mother’s life is threatened” position. Is anyone going to read this and think, “Yeah, I guess killing two babies is no big deal when stacked up against having to move to Staten Island.” What are these people thinking?

]]> By: Right On! Blog http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/27/selective-disclosure-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-4652 Right On! Blog Wed, 28 Jul 2004 03:14:16 +0000 http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=274#comment-4652 <strong>More abortion stories</strong> I don't know if I am looking for these stories, or if for some reason they're just popping up all over the place. There's <a href="http://timblair.spleenville.com/archives/007233.php" rel="nofollow">this story</a>, which seems hard to believe (via More abortion stories

I don't know if I am looking for these stories, or if for some reason they're just popping up all over the place. There's this story, which seems hard to believe (via

]]> By: Tom http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/27/selective-disclosure-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-4641 Tom Wed, 28 Jul 2004 03:10:35 +0000 http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=274#comment-4641 Thanks for this post, Michelle. But I have to say that a newspaper that would publish a story like that (in the "Lives" section, no less) seems unlikely to be concerned about pushing the views of a radical abortion activist, even duplicitously. Thanks for this post, Michelle. But I have to say that a newspaper that would publish a story like that (in the “Lives” section, no less) seems unlikely to be concerned about pushing the views of a radical abortion activist, even duplicitously.

]]> By: Nathan Moore http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/27/selective-disclosure-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-4640 Nathan Moore Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:18:33 +0000 http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=274#comment-4640 Atrocious, on counts of disclosure and substance. Why both aren't roundly condemned outside of the conservative blogosphere is telling. Nathan Moore http://www.moorethoughts.com Atrocious, on counts of disclosure and substance. Why both aren’t roundly condemned outside of the conservative blogosphere is telling.

Nathan Moore
http://www.moorethoughts.com

]]> By: Beldar http://michellemalkin.com/2004/07/27/selective-disclosure-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-4639 Beldar Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:56:29 +0000 http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=274#comment-4639 It's sad, but completely unsurprising, that the Times could have reacted to this extremely disturbing tale as coming from anyone "normal" in any sense of that word. It’s sad, but completely unsurprising, that the Times could have reacted to this extremely disturbing tale as coming from anyone “normal” in any sense of that word.

]]>