http://del.icio.us/ahzeqsdjfkl1/\”u+tube\” U Tube.

Have more blogs about Michael Moore-on on my site, SanityAnyone?

Me: Never been to Crawford, eh?

The documents not only show that we used him, but that we AIDED him with financial and military support, which he not only used against the Iranians, but against his own people.

Where was conservative “outrage” then against Saddam’s atrocities against his own people? Human’s rights groups were screaming about these atrocities for DECADES!

Oh, I get it. It’s irrelevant when our enemy’s enemy is our friend.

This is what’s shocking to me: conservative’s selective morality.

You folks never cease to amaze me.

So, shortly after the Iranians exiling of the Shaw and holding our people hostage for all those months, we supported their enemies. Amazing. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. It is old news.

The documents you referred to do, however, seem to establish beyond all doubt that Saddam had WMD’s, used WMD’s and was working to increase his arsenal of WMD’s.

Then, through the 90’s, he defied UN directives and hindered the UN INspectors every step of the way.

Oh, and their is still the matter of the gross human rights atrocities engaged in by Saddam’s oppressive regime for all those years.

So, you have helped establish that he had WMD’s, used WMD’s and wanted more WMD’s. He violated the sovereignty of neighboring nations at least twice. He paid Palestinians to bomb our allies in Israel. He kidnapped, tortured, raped and murdered many Iraqis. He rebuilt his military through illegal oil deals with France, Russia and Germany.

Your rebuttal…we helped him 20 years ago when he was fighting another one of our enemies.

So what? We used him when it suited us and eliminated him when he was more of a threat than an asset. That’s hardly a shocking accusation.

It also does nothing to say that this preemptive strike wasn’t warranted by world’s intelligence available at the time.

My, my, my…how EASY it is for so many of you to quote the “EVIL LIBERAL MEDIA” like the Washington Post when it serves your purpose, but when it point out indiscrepancies in your beloved president’s policies, you attack it and call it “inaccurate” .

And these articles do not give concrete evidence of anything, onecent.

In his article in Townhall, even Jacoby concedes: “To be sure, none of this proves that Saddam’s agents sought uranium for use in nuclear weapons.”

The Washington Post EDITORIAL also concedes: “What is to be learned from these findings? Not necessarily that Mr. Bush and his top aides are innocent of distorting the facts on Iraq. As we have said, we believe the record shows that they sometimes exaggerated intelligence reports that were themselves flawed. A case against Saddam Hussein could have been made without such hyperbole; by indulging in it, the Bush administration damaged its credibility and undermined support for the Iraq mission.”

When I opened up the article at Townhall.com, a screen popped up saying “Opinion zone” and asking me to subscribe.

Opinions are like a-holes, y’know.

So now I have a reading assignment for YOU, and fully expect you to meet your end of this deal like I met mine.

Here are FACTS. Listen…and learn.

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/

You forgot one little detail…

The U.S. (under Ronald Reagan) provided Saddam with chemical agents and military support in the 80’s.

The pics, video and documentation: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/

We have a free press here in America.

Moore is not engaged in ’self-criticism’ of America. As anybody who knows basic facts can tell, Moore’s films and books are chock-full of gross inaccuracies and distortions.

Bush has been criticized ever since he took office by ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FOX News, The New York Times, The Washington Post, the L.A. Times and on the internet as well.

Some of the criticism is very accurate and justified. The mainstream press here sometimes overdoes it because the overwhelming majority of newspeople are liberal and lean against Bush’s viewpoints on many issues.

I would also like to say that in it’s brief 228 year history America has been directly instrumental in liberating about 800 million people or so.

Why do you suppose that is when other countries that have the same amount of resources and manpower, such as Russia or China, don’t have a record like that?

By making a film full of wild conspiracy theories (such as the Bush Family is the pawn of the Saudi Dynasty – LOVE that one)Moore is not engaging in ’self-criticism’. He’s engaging in propaganda.

There are many websites on the internet where you can check the actual facts against Moore’s wild claims, should you be inclined to do so.

moorelies.com is a good one.

Brian

Although your question is very stupid, I would have to answer no, I would not send my child to secure Fallujah, because I do not have to send them in. You see Mr. Moore, there are many many young adults in my country that still believe in my country the U.S.A. and who, unlike you, truly understand what it means to Honorable sacrifice something for the greater cause of our Nation. I hope and pray that I will never have to send my child or any child out on the battle field, but I do worry that someday my child may have to pick up arms at an early age to defend my country because of people like you and kerry.