YET ANOTHER REASON NOT TO TRUST THE NEW YORK TIMES
Take a look at how this front-page New York Times article describes the perpetrators of the siege in Beslan. Notice anything? The killers are called “guerrillas” and “fighters” and “armed captors” but not “terrorists.” At one point the article grudgingly refers to these savage murderers as “people that Mr. Putin calls terrorists.” In more than 1,750 words, the article includes not one reference to the religion of the Muslim perpetrators. Not one.
Update: Stan from Logic & Sanity sent me a link to this Washington Post article on links between al Qaeda and the Muslim rebels in Chechnya. Money quote:
“There are no more al Qaeda camps” in Chechnya, Russian President Vladimir Putin said in February. “But there is still al Qaeda money. . . . There are instructors who are working, there are mercenaries from a number of Muslim countries recruited by radicals. Unfortunately, all that still exists there.”
Update II: The FReepers are ticked off at the NY Times too.
Update III: Meanwhile, Allahpundit has a sobering reminder about Vladimir Putin.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: New York Times
Mudville Gazette
» The five-year plan
NewsBusters.org
» Oprah To Do Primetime Christmas Special With The Obamas
Riehl World View
» Dowd: Dem Elites Displeased With Obama As Palin Rises
Stop The ACLU
» SEALs Charged With Assault for Arresting Top Terrorist
Gay Patriot
» The O So Hip Obama
Legal Insurrection
» Is "Finish the Job" the New "Peace With Honor"?
Weekly Standard
» DVR Alert: Oprah, Obama, Primetime, Christmas
JustOneMinute
» Getting Ready For The Turkey










See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
Trackback URL