Who is “curdled with hate?”

By Michelle Malkin  •  October 11, 2004 08:02 AM

In case you missed it, the New York Times Book Review finally got around to slamming Unfit for Command.

Two quick comments–one about the reviewer and one about the book review section:

1) The reviewer is Susannah Meadows, who is covering the Kerry campaign for Newsweek. In the second paragraph of her screed against the Swift Boat vets, she writes:

The problem is that John O’Neill, who is the driving force and public face of the book, is so curdled with hatred for Kerry that, as though he were an unreliable narrator in a Nabokov novel, you can’t trust what he says.

Now, I have never met John O’Neill. But I’ve seen him speak on TV numerous times, mostly in hostile situations. The singular thing that has struck me about John O’Neill is his ramrod integrity. Only the most unreconstructed Kerry apologist can view O’Neill as “curdled with hatred.” Unlike most of the combative TV hosts who have verbally abused him on TV, O’Neill never raises his voice. Never spits invective. He is calm, collected, and consumed not by hatred, but by dedication to the honor of his fellow soldiers.

Honor is a concept that Meadows fails to grasp. Which is why she is able to treat O’Neill and the Swift Boat Vets’ book with such blind contempt. It is appalling that someone who is such an abysmal judge of character can be entrusted to deliver “objective” political coverage.

2) Even more appalling, of course, is that anyone would assign Meadows to write such an embarrassing hit piece. And yet NY Times book reviewer Sam Tanenhaus did just that. No one ever expected a rave review of Unfit for Command to see the light of day at the Times, but many observers had high hopes that Tanenhaus, who wrote an acclaimed biography of Whittaker Chambers, would give conservatives a fair shake. It is not to be.

***
Winfield Myers has more on disappointment with Tanenhaus’ editorial judgment here. Powerline reprints a letter to the editor about the review from two Swift Boat vets. And Beldar has a terrific takedown of Meadows’ superficiality here.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Catallaxy
  2. Lead and Gold
  3. Editors in Pajamas
  4. travel home base business
  5. home based business opportunity seeker
  6. best home businesses
  7. gift

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Fishwrap of Record slashes jobs

October 19, 2009 03:19 PM by Michelle Malkin

52 Comments | 1 Trackback

A welcome message for the NYT’s new “opinion media monitor”

September 26, 2009 11:00 PM by Michelle Malkin

75 Comments | 20 Trackbacks

“Insufficient tuned-in-ness.”

What’s missing from the New York Times coverage of ACORN

September 16, 2009 12:09 AM by Michelle Malkin

89 Comments | 20 Trackbacks

Who said it: “The real story to all this is how these myriad entities allow them to shuffle money around so much that no one really knows what’s getting spent on what.”

Culture of Corruption stays at #1 for 5th week in a row

September 2, 2009 05:24 PM by Michelle Malkin

53 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Political nepotism: Spot the missing words

August 31, 2009 10:35 PM by Michelle Malkin

32 Comments | 1 Trackback

Emetic of the day: The David Brooks-Barack Obama love story

August 31, 2009 12:26 PM by Michelle Malkin

90 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

Torrid.

The NYTimes-Wikipedia whitewash

June 29, 2009 06:32 AM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments | 3 Trackbacks


Categories: New York Times, Swift Boat Vets



Mudville Gazette

» When the wind won't blow

Mudville Gazette

» Bad Weather (Part Two)

Mudville Gazette

» Bad Weather (Part I)

Legal Insurrection

» Hacked E-mails or Else!
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook