Did You Know...



By Michelle Malkin  •  November 8, 2004 04:01 AM

In today’s New York Times, columnist Bob Herbert argues that President Bush won last week because the American people are ignorant. He suggests in passing that Kerry could have won if only more people (presumably less ignorant people) had voted:

Last week’s election was extremely close and a modest shift in any number of factors might have changed the outcome. If the weather had been better in Ohio. …If the wait to get into the voting booth hadn’t been so ungodly long in certain Democratic precincts. … Or maybe if those younger voters had actually voted.

I hope other bloggers will dissect his claims about voter ignorance. As for blaming low turnout, I took apart that argument last week.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Posted in: Media,2004 campaign

Dem Debate open thread: Will Hillary take Andrea Mitchell’s advice on how to win New Hampshire?

February 4, 2016 05:32 PM by Doug Powers


Re-introductions are in order… again

Anti-Wall St. crusader Hillary Clinton explains accepting $675k from Goldman Sachs: ‘That’s what they offered’

February 3, 2016 09:43 PM by Doug Powers


Progressive capitalism explained

Trump-less Fox News GOP debate open thread

January 28, 2016 03:28 PM by Doug Powers


Yuge avoidance behavior

A tale of two tapes: Teen Cruz vs. Terror-Coddler Obama

January 27, 2016 07:33 AM by Michelle Malkin

Ex-MSNBC lefty Ed Schultz completes progressive pundit circle-of-life

January 14, 2016 10:41 PM by Doug Powers


New show “Russian to Judgment, with Ed Schultz” to debut soon

Categories: Feature Story, Media

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook