LETTER OF THE DAY
Gaston Serrato of Rowland Heights writes the Los Angeles Times in response to this editorial:
You criticize President Bush’s attorney general nominee, Alberto Gonzales (editorial, Nov. 11), stating that he wrote a memo “arguing that suspected terrorists captured in Afghanistan were not subject to protections under the Geneva Convention.” The Geneva Convention was designed to protect uniformed soldiers and civilians. Terrorists are not soldiers nor do they care about killing innocent civilians. They do not fall under the Geneva Convention’s protection. Perhaps when you see terrorists at your doorstep you will have a change of opinion.
Jonah Goldberg made the same point a few months ago (”In war on terror, Geneva Convention doesn’t apply“).
I’m not a big fan of Gonzales, but the Times’ suggestion that suspected terrorsts captured in Afghanistan are covered by the Geneva Convention is absurd.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Media Bias
AmSpecBlog
» The 39 Democrats Who Voted "No"
Right Pundits
» Joe Lieberman: Fort Hood Shooter Is ‘Home-Grown Terrorist’
Legal Insurrection
» Bruni de la Motte for Health Care Czar
Riehl World View
» Obama: No Military Death Shall Go Unexploited
Legal Insurrection
» In The End: No Public Option, No Abortions, No Pelosi, No Reid
The Other McCain
» Paralysis by analysis
The Powers That Be
» Obama: ‘Don’t Jump to Conclusions’ About Ft. Hood; Immediately Jumps to Conclusions
Legal Insurrection
» NY Times Names Names







See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
Trackback URL