THE SAN FRAN GUN BAN

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 17, 2004 04:11 PM

You’ve got to hand it to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. They are unrepentant, unabashed, and undeterred gun grabbers–and there ain’t nuthin’ that’s gonna stop ‘em from trampling all over the Second Amendment. Here’s the AP/SFgate.com story outlining the board’s sweeping gun ban proposal. Volokh notes it would ban the possession of handguns as well as the sales of all firearms and ammunition, including shotguns and rifles.

Defending the proposal, an official explained:

“The hope is twofold, that officers will have an opportunity to interact with folks and if they have a handgun, that will be reason enough to confiscate it.”

Clayton Cramer responds to this deadly Big Nannyism:

I love that: “an opportunity to interact with folks….” What they mean is that if the police find someone carrying a gun, they can arrest them and confiscate the gun. Oh, but they already can do so. It is unlawful to carry a concealed handgun in California without a permit (Cal. Penal Code 12025), or to carry a loaded firearm in an incorporated area (like San Francisco) openly (Cal. Penal Code 12031) and when they arrest you for either violation, they confiscate the gun.

So where are these “interactions” going to take place? In your home. Now, if they are arresting you for commiting a crime, they already confiscate the gun, and it is a rare moment indeed when a person gets a confiscated gun back in San Francisco–even if criminal charges are not filed. So what this really means is that if the police come to your home because you are a victim of a crime–and they find a gun–they’ll confiscate it–and make sure that you are even less able to defend yourself next time.

Some of the gun ban advocates are using the old public health rationale and are touting the measure as a suicide-prevention strategy. Which prompted two great comments. One from Cramer and one from Opinion Journal.com’s James Taranto:

Cramer.

Wait a minute: I thought liberals supported the right to suicide. They certainly support physician-assisted suicide. But they oppose suicide with a gun? Does anyone besides me find that just a bit bizarre?

Taranto.

Advocates of the ban present it as a suicide-prevention measure. Says Bill Barnes, an aide to Supervisor Chris Daly: “We know that for even law-abiding folks who own guns, the rates of suicide and mortality are substantially higher. So while just perceived to be a crime thing, we think there is a wide benefit to limiting the number of guns in the city.”

We think he’s wrong about mortality rates, which as far as we know are 100% for gun owners and gun shunners alike. But he may be right that gun owners are at risk of suicide. Good thing San Francisco doesn’t have any bridges.

Update: Xrlq notes this is a repeat from 22 years ago.

Posted in: Guns

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Running Scared
  2. Saintknowitall
  3. Diggers Realm
  4. Say Anything
  5. Aggressive-Voice Daily
  6. LibertyNews.org
  7. Small Town Veteran
  8. blogical conclusions
  9. View From Above
  10. Random Nuclear Strikes
  11. Diggers Realm
  12. Daily Pundit
  13. zyban quit smoking

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Thune concealed carry reciprocity amendment fails

July 22, 2009 12:33 PM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Self-defense story of the day

May 5, 2009 08:59 PM by Michelle Malkin

131 Comments | 16 Trackbacks

Another shooting spree that’s all your fault

April 4, 2009 07:18 PM by Michelle Malkin

84 Comments | 11 Trackbacks

Conviction.

Who’s responsible for the New York rampage?

April 4, 2009 10:29 AM by Michelle Malkin

195 Comments | 21 Trackbacks

Witch hunt.

Is Obama starving federal firearms program for pilots?

March 17, 2009 11:19 PM by Michelle Malkin

40 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Homeland insecurity alert.

Targeting law-abiding gun owners again

November 11, 2008 11:13 AM by Michelle Malkin

114 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Caution: Ignorant, gun-hating MSM at work

October 9, 2008 10:24 AM by Michelle Malkin

268 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

Misfire.


Categories: Guns



Mudville Gazette

» The five-year plan

Gay Patriot

» The O So Hip Obama
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook