Mindless liberal critics like to paint every conservative journalist as a Republican-subsidized cheerleader. The wasteful, foolish, and shameful Armstrong Williams/Education Department’s “Pay to Pander” scandal certainly doesn’t help. For the record, I am reprinting my column on “No Child Left Behind” published Aug. 2, 2000. Some of us are not for $ale.
Leave the slogans behind
by Michelle Malkin
Aug. 2, 2000
Copyright 2000 Creators Syndicate, Inc.
If the Republican Party grows any softer, it will need to replace the grand old elephant with a new symbol: the Pillsbury Doughboy.
This week’s GOP national convention in Philadelphia is a spectacle of sensitivity. A gala of giggly good feeling. A confab of can’t-we-all-just-get-along compassion. Real conservatives should be reaching for their extra-strength Dramamine. The party leadership’s liberal rhetoric is more nauseating than a boat ride in “The Perfect Storm.”
Take Texas Gov. George W. Bush’s pet phrase, “Leave no child behind.” Take it, drive a stake through it, and bury it, please. The slogan was the convention’s opening night theme, parroted and expanded upon by a rainbow-colored group hug of speakers:
“We must work together so that no child is left behind to ensure an America — an America whose future is one of unlimited hope and boundless opportunities,” declared Paul Harris, a black state legislator in Virginia.
Retired Gen. Colin L. Powell said: “Governor Bush’s proposals for improving education and expanding health care are examples of his vow to ‘leave no child behind’ and ensure access to quality care for all Americans.” “No child should be in a school that doesn’t work. Every child deserves the chance to learn and succeed,” urged Pilar Gomez, a Hispanic “parent-training coordinator” from Wisconsin.
“Every child should grow up in a permanent, loving family,” pleaded Conna Craig of Boston, director and president of something called the Institute for Children.
“It takes a village to ensure no child is left behind,” said First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton to the cheering GOP crowd.
OK, I made that last one up, but “leave no child behind” represents the kind of silly slogan that the Hillary-wing of the Democratic Party loves. It’s the thinking behind idiotic public-school policies such as social promotion — passing children to the next grade even when they have not mastered the current year’s academic work. The sad truth is, some children should be left behind for their own good.
“Leave no child behind” doesn’t just sound like Democratic pabulum. It is Democrat pabulum — lifted word for word from the trademark phrase of Hillary Clinton’s best friend, welfare state champion Marian Wright Edelman of the Children’s Defense Fund.
Edelman and the First Lady launched a “Leave No Child Behind” movement last year “to make children part of our deepest cultural messages” and “to broaden the constituency for children.” They stressed the always unobjectionable campaign for literacy to camouflage their true goals: gun control, universal health care, repeal of welfare reform, and an ever-expanding federal role in education.
Another loudmouthed left-winger, Jesse Jackson, invokes the “Leave no child behind” mantra to argue against school choice — which Gov. Bush says he supports.
Coming from Nanny State do-gooders, this nonsensical sloganeering is standard fare. The Democrats are supposed to be the Mommy Party, ruled by emotion; Republicans, the Daddy Party, ruled by rationale. But in Philadelphia, the alleged advocates for stern fiscal discipline and responsible public policy are putting on an embarrassing cross-dressing display — apron, high heels, hankies, and all — in pursuit of the White House.
In claiming that her husband will make a “great president,” Laura Bush didn’t cite George W.’s ability to cut government down to size. She didn’t give examples of his political courage or principled conservatism. Instead, Mrs. Bush praised her husband’s $5 billion Reading First proposal. Calling for “more clubs and programs,” Mrs. Bush described how “George and I always read to our girls — Dr. Seuss’ ‘Hop on Pop” was one of his favorites. George would lie on the floor, and the girls would literally hop on pop.”
My husband reads “Hop on Pop” to our daughter, too. We all turn into human marshmallows when it comes to kids. But that’s no excuse for conservatives to launch federal education spending sprees and other liberal child exploitation programs, no matter how well they test with soccer moms in focus groups. The presidential nominee of the Republican Party should stop impersonating Mrs. Clinton and start talking like a grown-up. The best way for government to exercise “compassionate conservatism” and help children get ahead is to leave their families’ pocketbooks alone.
Some other conservative critics of “No Child Left Behind” and the Bush administration’s profligate education spending:
And Dan Flynn, who nails it with his broader take on pay-to-pander-gate:
It’s interesting that the minor scandal has become the major scandal and the major scandal has become the minor one. It’s good that repercussions have found Mr. Williams. Tribune Media Services has canceled syndication of his column. But what about the Department of Education? They spent the taxpayers’ money on propaganda. This is about as clear a misuse of government dollars as it gets. Williams deserves our scorn, but not as much as the people who paid him deserve it.
In 1996, the Republican Party formally called for the abolition of the Department of Education. Today, they brag of presiding over the greatest increase in the federal education bureaucracy since its establishment under Jimmy Carter. Armstrong Williams’ pricetag was $241,000. Most pundits come a lot cheaper. The pricetag for conservatives shutting-up about Bush’s amnesty plan for illegal aliens, signing McCain-Feingold after labeling it “unconstitutional,” engaging in nation-building after mocking the practice in 2000, and increasing the size of the federal budget by a third, seems to read: “no charge.”
Or are other talking-heads receiving government subsid[ies,] too?
Come out, come out, wherever you are.
And Wizbang’s Kevin Aylward writes Williams’ professional obituary:
In the last paragraph of the [New York] Times story Armstrong Williams has this to say, “I have realized, you know what? I am part of this media elite club, and I have to be more responsible.”
Apparently given that Williams’ syndicated column was dropped as will (most likely) his TV show and appearances, was and should have been seem like more accurate terms.
Touchblog comments powered by Disqus
March 26, 2016 11:08 PM by Michelle Malkin
August 31, 2015 08:57 PM by Doug Powers
February 1, 2015 02:29 PM by Doug Powers
August 26, 2014 10:24 AM by Doug Powers
August 15, 2014 01:51 PM by Michelle Malkin