<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RATHERGATE VS. PAIDPUNDITGATE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/01/10/rathergate-vs-paidpunditgate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/01/10/rathergate-vs-paidpunditgate/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:08:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: U tube Videos</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/01/10/rathergate-vs-paidpunditgate/comment-page-1/#comment-13690</link>
		<dc:creator>U tube Videos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1143#comment-13690</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;U tube Videos&lt;/strong&gt;

http://www.aboutus.org/U-tube.ws &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.aboutus.org/U-tube.ws&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;U tube Videos&lt;/a&gt;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>U tube Videos</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.aboutus.org/U-tube.ws" rel="nofollow">http://www.aboutus.org/U-tube.ws</a> <a href='http://www.aboutus.org/U-tube.ws' rel="nofollow">U tube Videos</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prepaid credit cards</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/01/10/rathergate-vs-paidpunditgate/comment-page-1/#comment-13689</link>
		<dc:creator>prepaid credit cards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 11:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1143#comment-13689</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;prepaid credit cards&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/dobriiden/shell_credit_card.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;shell credit card&lt;/a&gt; &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/dobriiden/prepaid_credit_cards.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;prepaid credit cards&lt;/a&gt; &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/dobriiden/credit_card_companies.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cred...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>prepaid credit cards</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://user.aol.com/dobriiden/shell_credit_card.html" rel="nofollow">shell credit card</a> | <a href="http://user.aol.com/dobriiden/prepaid_credit_cards.html" rel="nofollow">prepaid credit cards</a> | <a href="http://user.aol.com/dobriiden/credit_card_companies.html" rel="nofollow">cred&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virtual girls</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/01/10/rathergate-vs-paidpunditgate/comment-page-1/#comment-13687</link>
		<dc:creator>virtual girls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1143#comment-13687</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;virtual girls&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://wapurl.co.uk/?O2IM7WI&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;virtual girls&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>virtual girls</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://wapurl.co.uk/?O2IM7WI" rel="nofollow">virtual girls</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beautiful Atrocities</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/01/10/rathergate-vs-paidpunditgate/comment-page-1/#comment-13683</link>
		<dc:creator>Beautiful Atrocities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1143#comment-13683</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;http://beautifulatrocities.com/archives/2005/01/wingnutgate_fir.html&lt;/strong&gt;

WINGNUTGATE First came the Armstrong Williams scandal, next the blogosphere was rocked by the news that Daily Kos was a paid hack for the Dean campaign. &#039;Unbelievable,&#039; said Wonkette, &#039;I just assumed he was an unpaid hack!&#039; Still, Markos has...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://beautifulatrocities.com/archives/2005/01/wingnutgate_fir.html" rel="nofollow">http://beautifulatrocities.com/archives/2005/01/wingnutgate_fir.html</a></strong></p>
<p>WINGNUTGATE First came the Armstrong Williams scandal, next the blogosphere was rocked by the news that Daily Kos was a paid hack for the Dean campaign. &#8216;Unbelievable,&#8217; said Wonkette, &#8216;I just assumed he was an unpaid hack!&#8217; Still, Markos has&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Electronic Chickens</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/01/10/rathergate-vs-paidpunditgate/comment-page-1/#comment-13682</link>
		<dc:creator>Electronic Chickens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1143#comment-13682</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Blogola&lt;/strong&gt;

I left this response to a comment on TalkLeft (scroll down), but since I&#039;m not sure it went through, I thought I&#039;d go ahead and post it here. Wellston Smith writes: That&#039;s how the GOP operates: They permit nobody to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blogola</strong></p>
<p>I left this response to a comment on TalkLeft (scroll down), but since I&#8217;m not sure it went through, I thought I&#8217;d go ahead and post it here. Wellston Smith writes: That&#8217;s how the GOP operates: They permit nobody to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher of Weasels</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/01/10/rathergate-vs-paidpunditgate/comment-page-1/#comment-13681</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher of Weasels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1143#comment-13681</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Council Has Spoken!&lt;/strong&gt;

First off...&#160; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&#160; and here.&#160; Die spambots, die!&#160; And now...&#160; the winning entries in the Watcher&#039;s Council vote for this week are CBS&#039; Memogate Report Comes Out But ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Council Has Spoken!</strong></p>
<p>First off&#8230;&nbsp; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&nbsp; and here.&nbsp; Die spambots, die!&nbsp; And now&#8230;&nbsp; the winning entries in the Watcher&#8217;s Council vote for this week are CBS&#8217; Memogate Report Comes Out But &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Education Wonks</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/01/10/rathergate-vs-paidpunditgate/comment-page-1/#comment-13680</link>
		<dc:creator>The Education Wonks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1143#comment-13680</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Armstrong Williams Faces The Music&lt;/strong&gt;

Today, Armstrong Williams has published his &quot;apology&quot; for misleading the public. The whole piece can be thought of as an exercise in spin control. In his opening statement...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Armstrong Williams Faces The Music</strong></p>
<p>Today, Armstrong Williams has published his &#8220;apology&#8221; for misleading the public. The whole piece can be thought of as an exercise in spin control. In his opening statement&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher of Weasels</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/01/10/rathergate-vs-paidpunditgate/comment-page-1/#comment-13679</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher of Weasels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1143#comment-13679</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Submitted for Your Approval&lt;/strong&gt;

First off...&#160; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&#160; and here.&#160; Die spambots, die!&#160; And now...&#160; here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher&#039;s Council for this week&#039;s vote. Council link...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Submitted for Your Approval</strong></p>
<p>First off&#8230;&nbsp; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&nbsp; and here.&nbsp; Die spambots, die!&nbsp; And now&#8230;&nbsp; here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher&#8217;s Council for this week&#8217;s vote. Council link&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Everlasting Phelps</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/01/10/rathergate-vs-paidpunditgate/comment-page-1/#comment-13678</link>
		<dc:creator>The Everlasting Phelps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1143#comment-13678</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Armstrong Apologies&lt;/strong&gt;

Okay, I&#039;ve seen a lot of Armstrong Apologies, the latest being the one from The Laughing Wolf. Michelle Malkin has been all over it too. Wolfie is apologizing about how they haven&#039;t been talking about it but that doesn&#039;t mean...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Armstrong Apologies</strong></p>
<p>Okay, I&#8217;ve seen a lot of Armstrong Apologies, the latest being the one from The Laughing Wolf. Michelle Malkin has been all over it too. Wolfie is apologizing about how they haven&#8217;t been talking about it but that doesn&#8217;t mean&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Black Republican</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/01/10/rathergate-vs-paidpunditgate/comment-page-1/#comment-13677</link>
		<dc:creator>The Black Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1143#comment-13677</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Setback&lt;/strong&gt;

I&#039;d been having a hard time grasping the significance of the Pay for Punditry scandal involving Armstrong Williams. Sure, it&#039;s clearly wrong and shouldn&#039;t have happened. I expected better from Williams, and I expect a Republican administration to do mo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Setback</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;d been having a hard time grasping the significance of the Pay for Punditry scandal involving Armstrong Williams. Sure, it&#8217;s clearly wrong and shouldn&#8217;t have happened. I expected better from Williams, and I expect a Republican administration to do mo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Laughing Wolf</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/01/10/rathergate-vs-paidpunditgate/comment-page-1/#comment-13676</link>
		<dc:creator>The Laughing Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1143#comment-13676</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Armstrong Williams&lt;/strong&gt;

No, I am not ignoring Armstrong Williams and a number of other stories, just very busy in real life right now. Michelle Malkin has the goods here, here, and here. What Williams did was flat out wrong, and a violation...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Armstrong Williams</strong></p>
<p>No, I am not ignoring Armstrong Williams and a number of other stories, just very busy in real life right now. Michelle Malkin has the goods here, here, and here. What Williams did was flat out wrong, and a violation&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher of Weasels</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/01/10/rathergate-vs-paidpunditgate/comment-page-1/#comment-13675</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher of Weasels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1143#comment-13675</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Submitted for Your Approval&lt;/strong&gt;

First off...&#160; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&#160; and here.&#160; Die spambots, die!&#160; And now...&#160; here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher&#039;s Council for this week&#039;s vote. Council link...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Submitted for Your Approval</strong></p>
<p>First off&#8230;&nbsp; any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,&nbsp; and here.&nbsp; Die spambots, die!&nbsp; And now&#8230;&nbsp; here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher&#8217;s Council for this week&#8217;s vote. Council link&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher of Weasels</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/01/10/rathergate-vs-paidpunditgate/comment-page-1/#comment-13674</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher of Weasels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1143#comment-13674</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Clueless&lt;/strong&gt;

What the hell was the Bush Administration doing spending a quarter of a million dollars to buy support from Armstrong Williams?&#160; To be honest, it took this scandal to bring to my attention that Armstrong Williams even had a show...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Clueless</strong></p>
<p>What the hell was the Bush Administration doing spending a quarter of a million dollars to buy support from Armstrong Williams?&nbsp; To be honest, it took this scandal to bring to my attention that Armstrong Williams even had a show&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brain Shavings</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/01/10/rathergate-vs-paidpunditgate/comment-page-1/#comment-13673</link>
		<dc:creator>Brain Shavings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 01:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1143#comment-13673</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Armstrong Williams payola&lt;/strong&gt;

I&#039;ve been thinking about how to express my disapproval of conservative commentator Armstrong Williams, who recently admitted taking money from the Bush Administration to become a booster for the No Child Left Behind Act. But now I don&#039;t need to worry a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Armstrong Williams payola</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking about how to express my disapproval of conservative commentator Armstrong Williams, who recently admitted taking money from the Bush Administration to become a booster for the No Child Left Behind Act. But now I don&#8217;t need to worry a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Nap Room</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/01/10/rathergate-vs-paidpunditgate/comment-page-1/#comment-13672</link>
		<dc:creator>The Nap Room</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 01:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1143#comment-13672</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Stretch Armstrong&lt;/strong&gt;

All Blogdom is alive with talk of Armstrong Williams. He took money to promote the No Child Left Behind law. If I owned or was editor of a paper that carried his writings, I would drop him. Many people want...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Stretch Armstrong</strong></p>
<p>All Blogdom is alive with talk of Armstrong Williams. He took money to promote the No Child Left Behind law. If I owned or was editor of a paper that carried his writings, I would drop him. Many people want&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
