WE GET RESULTS!
Last night, I blogged about Reuters’ inaccurate reporting on the CBS/Dan Rather story:
Um, when did CBS ever “retract” its report? And when did Dan Rather ever say he was “duped by bogus documents?”
…Will Reuters correct its bogus report?
The answer is yes, partially. Today, Reuters “clarified the story.” Here it is.
Thanks again to reader Pastor Karl Hollibaugh for pointing out Reuters’ blooper.
Posted in: Dan Rather
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: Dan Rather

Right Pundits
» Joe Lieberman: Fort Hood Shooter Is ‘Home-Grown Terrorist’
Legal Insurrection
» Bruni de la Motte for Health Care Czar
Riehl World View
» Obama: No Military Death Shall Go Unexploited
Legal Insurrection
» In The End: No Public Option, No Abortions, No Pelosi, No Reid
The Other McCain
» Paralysis by analysis
The Powers That Be
» Obama: ‘Don’t Jump to Conclusions’ About Ft. Hood; Immediately Jumps to Conclusions
Legal Insurrection
» NY Times Names Names





See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
Trackback URL