Well here we go again. Via Michelle Malkin and Drudge we find a Howard Kurtz piece on payments made to conservative columnist Maggie Gallagher. In 2002, syndicated columnist Maggie Gallagher repeatedly defended President Bush’s push for a $300 millio…

The Washington Post today is reporting that syndicated columnist Maggie Gallagher took money from the White House to promite government policy.

In 2002, she wrote multiple columns promoting a $300 million marriage defense initiative, but failed to d…

Michelle Malkin has an extensive post with links and commentary about the whole Maggie Gallagher thing.

The press is all over these pay for ink scandals. As Media Lies put it, “the blood is in the water.”

Gallagher responds here.

Of course th…

Most Malkin missives make me want to jump in cab headed for Maryland so that I can hop out of the car and snap her neck. But, on the issue of disclosure as it relates to blogging and/or journalism ethics,

Armstrong Williams was right. He wasn’t the only one.

According to the Washington Post (reg. req.), Maggie Gallagher, book author and conservative columnist, was paid $21,500 to promote President Bush’s “strenghtening marriage” initiative.Did I …

It’s early in the unravelling, but this appears really trashy (via Glenn):

In 2002, syndicated columnist Maggie Gallagher repeatedly defended President Bush’s push for a $300 million initiative enc…

Maggie Gallagher is the second conservative columnist to be outed for not telling anyone she was on the federal government’s…

….and the media will be circling, looking for more “victims”.

I haven’t commented at all on the Armstrong WIlliams fiasco. There’s been plenty of that in the blogosphere. Now Michelle Malkin reveals that another conservative writer was accepting…

According to the WaPo, “in 2002, syndicated columnist Maggie Gallagher repeatedly defended President Bush’s push for a $300 million initiative encouraging marriage as a way of strengthening families.” The question is, did the $21,500 contract with the …