STATE OF THE UNION: QUICK NOTES
President Bush threw a bone to fiscal conservatives in tonight’s speech with these lines:
America’s prosperity requires restraining the spending appetite of the federal government. I welcome the bipartisan enthusiasm for spending discipline. So next week I will send you a budget that holds the growth of discretionary spending below inflation, makes tax relief permanent, and stays on track to cut the deficit in half by 2009. My budget substantially reduces or eliminates more than 150 government programs that are not getting results, or duplicate current efforts, or do not fulfill essential priorities. The principle here is clear: a taxpayer dollar must be spent wisely, or not at all.
There’s no list yet, but I’m not holding my breath. As Citizens Against Government Waste reminds us: “Last year, President Bush targeted 13 poorly-performing programs for elimination; Congress continued funding for all but one.” CAGW’s report, Prime Cuts, recommends 592 specific spending cuts that could save taxpayers $217 billion in fiscal 2005 and $1.65 trillion over the next five years. Why doesn’t the president recommend each and every one?
On immigration, Bush offered the usual platitudes:
America’s immigration system is also outdated — unsuited to the needs of our economy and to the values of our country. We should not be content with laws that punish hard-working people who want only to provide for their families, and deny businesses willing workers, and invite chaos at our border. It is time for an immigration policy that permits temporary guest workers to fill jobs Americans will not take, that rejects amnesty, that tells us who is entering and leaving our country, and that closes the border to drug dealers and terrorists.
No recognition at all here from Bush that the vast majority of Americans favor stricter immigration enforcement against both “willing” employers who have put profits over national security and the willful illegal alien lawbreakers they are employing. No word of support for House Republican efforts to push for secure identification and asylum reform. Even Hillary would have done better.
On Social Security, it was smart to remind Congress and the American public of a few entitlement reformers in both parties who had offered prior fixes:
Fixing Social Security permanently will require an open, candid review of the options. Some have suggested limiting benefits for wealthy retirees. Former Congressman Tim Penny has raised the possibility of indexing benefits to prices rather than wages. During the 1990s, my predecessor, President Clinton, spoke of increasing the retirement age. Former Sen. John Breaux suggested discouraging early collection of Social Security benefits. The late Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan recommended changing the way benefits are calculated. All these ideas are on the table. I know that none of these reforms would be easy. But we have to move ahead with courage and honesty, because our children’s retirement security is more important than partisan politics.
Captain Ed concludes: “He’s much improved over last year, and I think he gets better every year he’s in office. He may never be considered a great orator (for good reason), but he delivers some of the best political speeches since Reagan…Freedom will be his great theme, just as the New Deal was FDR’s or the Great Society was LBJ’s. W’s will be the Force of Human Freedom.”
David Frum says: “Ever since Ronald Reagan invented the tradition, every State of the Union has had its moments of emotion. All too often in the past, these moments were cynically manipulative or unworthy of the high importance of the event. Not tonight. The stories of Safia Taleb al-Suhail and Byron Norwood represented the outermost limits of human courage, suffering, and sacrifice in the public realm.”
Frank J. liveblogs the Democratic response: State of the Jackasses. James Joyner also tries to liveblog Reid and Pelosi, but finds it excruciatingly hard to pay attention.
Jeff G. translates the Dem response.
Ramblings’ Journal notices something about President Bush and Cynthia McKinney.
And the rest of the best is at Wizbang.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Fast and Furious showdown: Holder/Obama defend bloody culture of contempt; Update: Fortress Holder, Stonewall City; vid clips added, Dems advise, “Don’t answer”
February 2, 2012 09:16 AM by Michelle Malkin
158 CommentsObama and Jan Brewer Have Words on Airport Tarmac; Update: Brewer Book Sales Skyrocket
January 25, 2012 09:54 PM by Doug Powers
165 CommentsGingrich channels open-borders SEIU; Rubio rebukes; Update:Newt retreats
January 25, 2012 10:56 AM by Michelle Malkin
155 CommentsObama heads to Disney World to push looser visa policies
January 17, 2012 01:14 PM by Michelle Malkin
95 CommentsObama’s “Razist” Lobbyist Moves Up
January 13, 2012 06:29 AM by Michelle Malkin
233 CommentsThe Year in Obama Scandals — and Scandal Deniers
December 28, 2011 12:04 PM by Michelle Malkin
122 CommentsThe murder of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry: One year ago today
December 14, 2011 11:11 AM by Michelle Malkin
70 CommentsSupreme Court to Decide Arizona Immigration Law
December 12, 2011 01:18 PM by Doug Powers
57 CommentsBill Clinton: Presidents Should Be Able to Serve More Than 2 Terms
November 8, 2011 04:31 PM by Doug Powers
39 Comments
Categories: Bill Clinton,Cynthia McKinney,Immigration,Ronald Reagan
JustOneMinute
» I Guess I'm Still Stuck On Stupid

Weekly Standard
» ‘No Precedent for the Government Ordering Private Companies to Offer a Product for Free’
Riehl World View
» Whitney Houston: If I should stay I would only be in your way
Patterico
» Rick Santorum and the two playbooks
Riehl World View
» Romney's Blood Is Blue, Not Conservative













See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.