DEEP THOUGHTS ABOUT VACCINES AT THE TIMES

By Michelle Malkin  •  February 7, 2005 06:14 AM

Has anyone else noticed how vapid the New York Times‘ editorials on the flu vaccine are? Their editorial last October bemoaned the paucity of vaccine manufacturers but did not not suggest anything–not one thing–that would attract more manufacturers to the market. Today the Times revisits the issue, repeating the platitude that “the vaccine manufacturing process must be made more reliable” but again offering no solutions.

Does anyone take this drivel seriously?

Posted in: Health care

Add your opinion

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The Demcare bribe list

November 20, 2009 11:17 AM by Michelle Malkin

175 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

Payoffs from A to Z.

Rejected AARP solicitation form of the day

November 19, 2009 08:28 AM by Michelle Malkin

36 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Protesting Pelosicare in her own backyard

November 16, 2009 10:37 AM by Michelle Malkin

21 Comments | 1 Trackback

Ho-hum: Pelosicare hikes costs $289 billion

November 14, 2009 10:40 PM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

How Chris Dodd is exploiting the flu “crisis”

November 11, 2009 01:09 PM by Michelle Malkin

27 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Hold still. It’s gonna hurt.

Here comes Harrycare!

November 11, 2009 01:12 AM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments | 2 Trackbacks


Categories: Health care



Mudville Gazette

» When the wind won't blow

Mudville Gazette

» Bad Weather (Part Two)

Mudville Gazette

» Bad Weather (Part I)

Legal Insurrection

» Hacked E-mails or Else!
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook