THE LOS ANGELES TIMES‘ WEAK CORRECTION

By Michelle Malkin  •  February 15, 2005 07:06 AM

The Los Angeles Times runs a lame correction regarding its Eason Jordan coverage. Reminds me of Slate’s awful correction a few months ago. What is the point of running a correction if the correction is as bad as the original error?

Posted in: Eason Jordan

Add your opinion

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Jamil Hussein development: “Faces arrest?”

January 4, 2007 05:26 PM by Michelle Malkin

0 Comments | 41 Trackbacks

Going to Iraq

January 3, 2007 11:00 AM by Michelle Malkin

0 Comments | 40 Trackbacks

The AP (non-)responds and
another search comes up empty

December 21, 2006 04:40 PM by Michelle Malkin

0 Comments | 16 Trackbacks

Eason Jordan is back

December 13, 2006 05:29 PM by Michelle Malkin

0 Comments | 6 Trackbacks


Categories: Eason Jordan



Mudville Gazette

» Surrender, he whispered
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook