MMR VS. M, M, AND R

By Michelle Malkin  •  March 4, 2005 07:36 AM

This article describes the results of the latest study that purports to show no relationship between the MMR vaccine and autism:

Researchers looked at the incidence of autism in a Japanese city before and after the withdrawal of the measles, mumps and rubella jab in 1993.

New Scientist reports autism rates kept rising after MMR was withdrawn.

Michael Rutter, of the Institute of Psychiatry, who worked on the study, said it “rubbished” the link between MMR and a general rise in autism….

This study is the first to look at rates of autism after the withdrawal of the vaccine.

Japan withdrew MMR after concerns that the strain of mumps vaccine it contained was linked to cases of meningitis, and replaced it with single vaccines.

I’ve long been skeptical of the claim that the MMR vaccine causes autism. What bothers me about this story is not that it defends the MMR vaccine but that it distorts what actually occurred in Japan.

If you read all the way through the article, you learn that Japan replaced MMR with three separate vaccines for mumps, measles, and rubella. Given that, it’s pretty misleading to say, as this article does in the first sentence and elsewhere, that Japan “withdrew” the vaccine.

The subtitle of the BBC story is: “Scientists say they have strong evidence that the MMR vaccination is not linked to a rise in autism.”

A more fair and balanced subtitle would read: “Scientists say they have strong evidence that replacing the MMR vaccine with separate vaccines for mumps, measles, and rubella is not linked to a rise in autism.”

***

Related:

- When weighing the risks and benefits of the MMR vaccine, don’t forget the risk of contamination.

- The New York Times editorial page is worried about the Food and Drug Administration’s use of experts with ties to industry. How come the Times has never expressed concerns about similar conflicts of interest among vaccine experts?

- For the second year in a row, Canada’s flu vaccine was apparently ineffective because it completely missed the strains circulating around the world. I hear the same was true here in the U.S., but haven’t seen any news coverage here. More on the inefficacy of flu shots here.

Posted in: Health care

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. The Shape of Days

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The Demcare bribe list

November 20, 2009 11:17 AM by Michelle Malkin

176 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

Payoffs from A to Z.

Rejected AARP solicitation form of the day

November 19, 2009 08:28 AM by Michelle Malkin

36 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Protesting Pelosicare in her own backyard

November 16, 2009 10:37 AM by Michelle Malkin

21 Comments | 1 Trackback

Ho-hum: Pelosicare hikes costs $289 billion

November 14, 2009 10:40 PM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

How Chris Dodd is exploiting the flu “crisis”

November 11, 2009 01:09 PM by Michelle Malkin

27 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Hold still. It’s gonna hurt.

Here comes Harrycare!

November 11, 2009 01:12 AM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments | 2 Trackbacks


Categories: Health care



Mudville Gazette

» When the wind won't blow

Mudville Gazette

» Bad Weather (Part Two)

Mudville Gazette

» Bad Weather (Part I)

Legal Insurrection

» Hacked E-mails or Else!
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook