About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

MMR VS. M, M, AND R

By Michelle Malkin  •  March 4, 2005 07:36 AM

This article describes the results of the latest study that purports to show no relationship between the MMR vaccine and autism:

Researchers looked at the incidence of autism in a Japanese city before and after the withdrawal of the measles, mumps and rubella jab in 1993.

New Scientist reports autism rates kept rising after MMR was withdrawn.

Michael Rutter, of the Institute of Psychiatry, who worked on the study, said it “rubbished” the link between MMR and a general rise in autism….

This study is the first to look at rates of autism after the withdrawal of the vaccine.

Japan withdrew MMR after concerns that the strain of mumps vaccine it contained was linked to cases of meningitis, and replaced it with single vaccines.

I’ve long been skeptical of the claim that the MMR vaccine causes autism. What bothers me about this story is not that it defends the MMR vaccine but that it distorts what actually occurred in Japan.

If you read all the way through the article, you learn that Japan replaced MMR with three separate vaccines for mumps, measles, and rubella. Given that, it’s pretty misleading to say, as this article does in the first sentence and elsewhere, that Japan “withdrew” the vaccine.

The subtitle of the BBC story is: “Scientists say they have strong evidence that the MMR vaccination is not linked to a rise in autism.”

A more fair and balanced subtitle would read: “Scientists say they have strong evidence that replacing the MMR vaccine with separate vaccines for mumps, measles, and rubella is not linked to a rise in autism.”

***

Related:

- When weighing the risks and benefits of the MMR vaccine, don’t forget the risk of contamination.

- The New York Times editorial page is worried about the Food and Drug Administration’s use of experts with ties to industry. How come the Times has never expressed concerns about similar conflicts of interest among vaccine experts?

- For the second year in a row, Canada’s flu vaccine was apparently ineffective because it completely missed the strains circulating around the world. I hear the same was true here in the U.S., but haven’t seen any news coverage here. More on the inefficacy of flu shots here.

Posted in: Health care

Add your opinion

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. The Shape of Days

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

In Santa Cruz, not all smoke is equal

September 9, 2008 10:57 AM by Michelle Malkin

72 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Dude.

More nosy doctors who don’t like guns

July 8, 2008 05:44 PM by Michelle Malkin

77 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Bad medicine.

Sick: U.S. liver transplants for Japanese gang members

May 30, 2008 08:22 AM by Michelle Malkin

63 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

A health care crime.

It depends on the meaning of “working poor”

March 31, 2008 09:00 PM by Michelle Malkin

24 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Sinking S-CHIP.

In defense of parents with informed vaccine skepticism

March 24, 2008 09:49 PM by Michelle Malkin

68 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Shot in the arm.

The Trojan Horse S-CHIP Republicans

January 23, 2008 08:15 PM by Michelle Malkin

38 Comments | 1 Trackback

The Hillary health care papers

January 18, 2008 01:28 PM by Michelle Malkin

40 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

“…to expose lifestyles…”

Nanny Bloomberg: Cheez-Its for me, but not for thee

January 11, 2008 10:24 AM by Michelle Malkin

62 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Trans-fat hypocrisy.

How to lose weight like an economist

January 7, 2008 12:30 PM by Michelle Malkin

21 Comments | 0 Trackbacks


Categories: Health care


Hotline On Call

» Ayers And ACORN