About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

TOO IMPORTANT FOR PRISON?

By Michelle Malkin  •  March 4, 2005 09:44 AM

You’re not going to believe this one. From Elmer Smith in the Philadelphia Daily News:

[Tracy] McIntosh pleaded no contest to a charge that he forced himself on his semi-conscious victim while she was sick and groggy from liquor and drugs that he allegedly slipped into one of her drinks.

But then he threw himself on the mercy of a court that was more merciful to him than he was to his victim and more merciful than it would have been with most sexual predators, I suspect.

Unlike most sexual predators, this one faced a judge who took judicial notice of his important work with victims of stroke and brain injuries. McIntosh, a former Fulbright scholar, was director of Penn’s Head Injury Research Center when he assaulted his victim.

Means, apparently impressed by McIntosh’s credentials, ignored sentencing guidelines calling for five-11 years in prison and placed him under house arrest for up to two years plus 12 years’ probation.

The victim in the case had begged Judge Means to send McIntosh to jail.

“By raping me, he took something from me that I will never get back,” she said. “It will affect me for the rest of my life, and I don’t want this to happen to other women.”

In explaining his decision, Means said he “factored in McIntosh’s important work with stroke victims and brain injuries,” according to the Daily News.

McIntosh is considered one of the best brain researchers in the world. His research on stem cells has the potential to help people with spinal-cord injuries.

But that shouldn’t matter in a court of law. McIntosh did the crime; he should do some time.

District Attorney Lynne Abraham, agrees. Yesterday she said she will file a motion of reconsideration of sentence.

“Nobody is ‘too important’ for prison,” Abraham said. “This is a crime that clearly deserves prison time.”

(Hat tip: reader Richard Davis)

Posted in: Double standards

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Down with Absolutes!
  2. Simply Kimberly
  3. Imago Dei
  4. Error Theory
  5. Frog's House of Infinite Wisdom
  6. Impleader.com
  7. EphBlog
  8. Zibibbo is Good
  9. EphBlog
  10. celebrex online
  11. micro bikinis skimpy bikini teen teeny bikini skimpy bikini contest string bikini contests g string bikinis
  12. bathroom voyeur dressing room voyeur free voyeur photos 23 voyeur pics voyeur teen free voyeur pics voyeur cam

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Here’s a better analogy for Bill Ayers than Tom Coburn: Eric Rudolph.

April 19, 2008 06:42 AM by see-dubya

70 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

When moral equivalence is moral equivocation. (Now with Hillary operative’s “red-baiting” update!)

California to hike taxes on beer?

April 12, 2008 01:57 PM by see-dubya

41 Comments | 1 Trackback

Chardonnay growers rejoice.

London school is a chastity ring-free zone

June 23, 2007 10:33 PM by Michelle Malkin

37 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

Muslim headscarves are in. Christian purity rings are out. Double standards? What double standards?

Data-mining for me, but not for thee

May 9, 2007 04:02 PM by Michelle Malkin

0 Comments | 1 Trackback

Race, crime, and media taboos

April 16, 2007 11:34 AM by Michelle Malkin

0 Comments | 1 Trackback

Christ Killa: The latest in religion-bashing art

April 13, 2007 08:45 AM by Michelle Malkin

0 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

“Right wing fundamentalist” terrorism drills

April 5, 2007 10:26 AM by Michelle Malkin

1 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Only TSA jokers get to joke

April 2, 2007 11:54 PM by Michelle Malkin

1 Comments | 4 Trackbacks


Categories: Double standards


Marginal Revolution

» What is mystery ingredient X?

Weekly Standard

» Required Reading