<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: APPLE VS. BLOGGERS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/05/apple-vs-bloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/05/apple-vs-bloggers/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:26:21 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 14 gauge earring</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/05/apple-vs-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-18599</link>
		<dc:creator>14 gauge earring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1611#comment-18599</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;14 gauge earring&lt;/strong&gt;

APPLE VS. BLOGGERS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>14 gauge earring</strong></p>
<p>APPLE VS. BLOGGERS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Shape of Days</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/05/apple-vs-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-18598</link>
		<dc:creator>The Shape of Days</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1611#comment-18598</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;My two cents on &lt;i&gt;Apple v. dePlume&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

Welcome, MacSlash, MacSurfer, Stepwise and Michelle Malkin readers. Thanks for stopping by. There&#8217;s a sort of sideways follow-up to this post here; you might enjoy reading it, too. Back in January, Apple Computer filed a lawsuit against an entity...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>My two cents on <i>Apple v. dePlume</i></strong></p>
<p>Welcome, MacSlash, MacSurfer, Stepwise and Michelle Malkin readers. Thanks for stopping by. There&#8217;s a sort of sideways follow-up to this post here; you might enjoy reading it, too. Back in January, Apple Computer filed a lawsuit against an entity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Shape of Days</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/05/apple-vs-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-18595</link>
		<dc:creator>The Shape of Days</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 07:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1611#comment-18595</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;My two cents on &lt;i&gt;Apple v. dePlume&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

Welcome, MacSlash, MacSurfer, Stepwise and Michelle Malkin readers. Thanks for stopping by. There&#039;s a sort of sideways follow-up to this post here; you might enjoy reading it, too. Back in January, Apple Computer filed a lawsuit against an entity calle...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>My two cents on <i>Apple v. dePlume</i></strong></p>
<p>Welcome, MacSlash, MacSurfer, Stepwise and Michelle Malkin readers. Thanks for stopping by. There&#8217;s a sort of sideways follow-up to this post here; you might enjoy reading it, too. Back in January, Apple Computer filed a lawsuit against an entity calle&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Controversy.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/05/apple-vs-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-18594</link>
		<dc:creator>Controversy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1611#comment-18594</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Apple v dePlume: Bloggers = Journalists?&lt;/strong&gt;

AP reported late last week:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Apple v dePlume: Bloggers = Journalists?</strong></p>
<p>AP reported late last week:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damnum absque injuria</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/05/apple-vs-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-18593</link>
		<dc:creator>damnum absque injuria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 22:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1611#comment-18593</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;End the Journalistic Privilege&lt;/strong&gt;

As a staunch opponent of the journalistic privilege, I&#039;m having a hard time getting nearly as worked up over this as he and she are.  Nevertheless, I am quite offended by the notion that a blogger is not a &quot;publisher, editor, reporter, or other person ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>End the Journalistic Privilege</strong></p>
<p>As a staunch opponent of the journalistic privilege, I&#8217;m having a hard time getting nearly as worked up over this as he and she are.  Nevertheless, I am quite offended by the notion that a blogger is not a &#8220;publisher, editor, reporter, or other person &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Rob's House of Opinions</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/05/apple-vs-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-18592</link>
		<dc:creator>J Rob's House of Opinions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 21:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1611#comment-18592</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;This Keeps Getting Worse&lt;/strong&gt;

The First Ammendment cannot protect one group and not another. If it fails to protect all in the realm of conscience and communication then it becomes a farce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>This Keeps Getting Worse</strong></p>
<p>The First Ammendment cannot protect one group and not another. If it fails to protect all in the realm of conscience and communication then it becomes a farce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macCompanion Blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/05/apple-vs-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-18591</link>
		<dc:creator>macCompanion Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 18:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1611#comment-18591</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Apple pursues anti&#45;First Amendment litigation&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The lawyers at Apple need to knock it off. They are giving Apple a bad name as they pursue Draconian measures to stifle &quot;information&quot; &#45; or stop biting the hand that feeds them. At this rate it won&apos; t take too long before folks see...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Apple pursues anti&#45;First Amendment litigation</strong></p>
<p>The lawyers at Apple need to knock it off. They are giving Apple a bad name as they pursue Draconian measures to stifle &quot;information&quot; &#45; or stop biting the hand that feeds them. At this rate it won&apos; t take too long before folks see&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Blurred Brain Blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/05/apple-vs-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-18590</link>
		<dc:creator>The Blurred Brain Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 16:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1611#comment-18590</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The FEC Won&#039;t Let Me Be&lt;/strong&gt;

Earlier I wrote about the FEC attempting to regulate on-line speech.  That article along with this one in which Apple sued a couple of bloggers has the government in the business of deciding who&#039;s ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The FEC Won&#8217;t Let Me Be</strong></p>
<p>Earlier I wrote about the FEC attempting to regulate on-line speech.  That article along with this one in which Apple sued a couple of bloggers has the government in the business of deciding who&#8217;s &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capital Region People</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/05/apple-vs-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-18589</link>
		<dc:creator>Capital Region People</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 15:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1611#comment-18589</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;2 Blog or not 2 Blog?&lt;/strong&gt;

Do Bloggers have a responsibility to admit when they are wrong?  This question is popping up in the wake of Friday&#039;s arrests in the Armanious Family murder case in Jersey City NJ. The discussion revolves around trackbacks from and to Michelle Malkin&#039;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>2 Blog or not 2 Blog?</strong></p>
<p>Do Bloggers have a responsibility to admit when they are wrong?  This question is popping up in the wake of Friday&#8217;s arrests in the Armanious Family murder case in Jersey City NJ. The discussion revolves around trackbacks from and to Michelle Malkin&#8217;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blind Mind's Eye</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/05/apple-vs-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-18588</link>
		<dc:creator>Blind Mind's Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1611#comment-18588</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The freedom of the press is for publishing, nor journalism&lt;/strong&gt;

Repeat after me, the freedom of the press referenced in the U.S. Constitution is for the publishing of ideas and speech, not protecting professional journalism. Good, now I take exception to Michelle Malkin and others&#039; defense of Think Secret in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The freedom of the press is for publishing, nor journalism</strong></p>
<p>Repeat after me, the freedom of the press referenced in the U.S. Constitution is for the publishing of ideas and speech, not protecting professional journalism. Good, now I take exception to Michelle Malkin and others&#8217; defense of Think Secret in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Little About Everything</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/05/apple-vs-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-18587</link>
		<dc:creator>A Little About Everything</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 04:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1611#comment-18587</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;An blog a day keeps Apple away&lt;/strong&gt;

Via: BBC News; Hat Tip:  Cheese &amp; Crackers.&#039;Blogger fear&#039; in Apple leak case

Three blogs which published sensitive information about upcoming Apple products could be made to disclose where the leaks came from.  A California judge said in a prelimina...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>An blog a day keeps Apple away</strong></p>
<p>Via: BBC News; Hat Tip:  Cheese &#038; Crackers.&#8217;Blogger fear&#8217; in Apple leak case</p>
<p>Three blogs which published sensitive information about upcoming Apple products could be made to disclose where the leaks came from.  A California judge said in a prelimina&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheese and Crackers</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/05/apple-vs-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-18586</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheese and Crackers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 03:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1611#comment-18586</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bad News for Bloggers&lt;/strong&gt;

Michelle Malkin does it justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bad News for Bloggers</strong></p>
<p>Michelle Malkin does it justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BLATHER REVIEW</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/05/apple-vs-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-18585</link>
		<dc:creator>BLATHER REVIEW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 02:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1611#comment-18585</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Free To Blog?&lt;/strong&gt;

Apple Computers is making a case that bloggers are not protected by laws that protect journalists from being prosecuted for refusing to reveal their sources. Michelle Malkin has a post about it (with links to other blogs with commentary). The...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Free To Blog?</strong></p>
<p>Apple Computers is making a case that bloggers are not protected by laws that protect journalists from being prosecuted for refusing to reveal their sources. Michelle Malkin has a post about it (with links to other blogs with commentary). The&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Shape of Days</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/05/apple-vs-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-18584</link>
		<dc:creator>The Shape of Days</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 01:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1611#comment-18584</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;My two cents on &lt;i&gt;Apple v. dePlume&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

The back story Back in January, Apple Computer filed a lawsuit against an entity called The dePlume Organization LLC, operator</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>My two cents on <i>Apple v. dePlume</i></strong></p>
<p>The back story Back in January, Apple Computer filed a lawsuit against an entity called The dePlume Organization LLC, operator</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
