<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: APPLE VS. BLOGGERS, PART II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/06/apple-vs-bloggers-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/06/apple-vs-bloggers-part-ii/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:28:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: baby skin care</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/06/apple-vs-bloggers-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-18673</link>
		<dc:creator>baby skin care</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 13:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1617#comment-18673</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;baby skin care&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/topissues/essential_skin_care.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;essential skin care&lt;/a&gt; &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/topissues/skin_care_product_reviews.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;skin care product reviews&lt;/a&gt; &#124; 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>baby skin care</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://user.aol.com/topissues/essential_skin_care.html" rel="nofollow">essential skin care</a> | <a href="http://user.aol.com/topissues/skin_care_product_reviews.html" rel="nofollow">skin care product reviews</a> |</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prepaid credit cards</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/06/apple-vs-bloggers-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-18672</link>
		<dc:creator>prepaid credit cards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 11:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1617#comment-18672</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;prepaid credit cards&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/dobriiden/prepaid_credit_cards.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;prepaid credit cards&lt;/a&gt; &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/dobriiden/chase_credit_cards.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chase credit cards&lt;/a&gt; &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/dobriiden/credit_card_companies.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cr...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>prepaid credit cards</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://user.aol.com/dobriiden/prepaid_credit_cards.html" rel="nofollow">prepaid credit cards</a> | <a href="http://user.aol.com/dobriiden/chase_credit_cards.html" rel="nofollow">chase credit cards</a> | <a href="http://user.aol.com/dobriiden/credit_card_companies.html" rel="nofollow">cr&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: credit report repair</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/06/apple-vs-bloggers-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-18671</link>
		<dc:creator>credit report repair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1617#comment-18671</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;credit report repair&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/nashebablo/pentagon_federal_credit_union.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pentagon federal credit union&lt;/a&gt; &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/nashebablo/credit_reports.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;credit reports&lt;/a&gt; &#124;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>credit report repair</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://user.aol.com/nashebablo/pentagon_federal_credit_union.html" rel="nofollow">pentagon federal credit union</a> | <a href="http://user.aol.com/nashebablo/credit_reports.html" rel="nofollow">credit reports</a> |</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virtual girls</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/06/apple-vs-bloggers-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-18670</link>
		<dc:creator>virtual girls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1617#comment-18670</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;virtual girls&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://wapurl.co.uk/?O2IM7WI&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;virtual girls&lt;/a&gt; VG001283724</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>virtual girls</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://wapurl.co.uk/?O2IM7WI" rel="nofollow">virtual girls</a> VG001283724</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Volokh Conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/06/apple-vs-bloggers-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-18666</link>
		<dc:creator>The Volokh Conspiracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 01:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1617#comment-18666</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Optional Speech Protections:&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The First Amendment protects speech, and the Supreme Court has made clear that it protects Internet speech as well as offline speech.  Under the logic of the Court&#039;s First Amendment cases, bloggers should be as protected as large...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Optional Speech Protections:</strong></p>
<p>The First Amendment protects speech, and the Supreme Court has made clear that it protects Internet speech as well as offline speech.  Under the logic of the Court&#8217;s First Amendment cases, bloggers should be as protected as large&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colbert's Comments</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/06/apple-vs-bloggers-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-18665</link>
		<dc:creator>Colbert's Comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 09:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1617#comment-18665</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Couldn&#039;t sleep decided to surf&lt;/strong&gt;

Bill Hennessy put up a great post which includes a brief history of Senator KKK Byrd. If you are asking yourself what does this mean to Canadians? Just remember this guy and what he stands for the next time somebody calls you a racist for having conser...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Couldn&#8217;t sleep decided to surf</strong></p>
<p>Bill Hennessy put up a great post which includes a brief history of Senator KKK Byrd. If you are asking yourself what does this mean to Canadians? Just remember this guy and what he stands for the next time somebody calls you a racist for having conser&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheese and Crackers</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/06/apple-vs-bloggers-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-18664</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheese and Crackers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 07:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1617#comment-18664</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;I am a journalist, too.&lt;/strong&gt;

Michelle Malkin does her due diligence on the Apple v. Blogger story. This is going to be a nasty fight; and we all have an interest in this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I am a journalist, too.</strong></p>
<p>Michelle Malkin does her due diligence on the Apple v. Blogger story. This is going to be a nasty fight; and we all have an interest in this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArmchairGenius.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/06/apple-vs-bloggers-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-18663</link>
		<dc:creator>ArmchairGenius.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 03:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1617#comment-18663</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Are Bloggers Journalists?&lt;/strong&gt;

I think I see a loophole in the Free Flow of Information Act. I just printed out my blog - so I have now published it on to paper - and it has become a newspaper, or should I go with magazine? Or other periodical? I think the money is in magazines, s...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Are Bloggers Journalists?</strong></p>
<p>I think I see a loophole in the Free Flow of Information Act. I just printed out my blog &#8211; so I have now published it on to paper &#8211; and it has become a newspaper, or should I go with magazine? Or other periodical? I think the money is in magazines, s&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Rob's House of Opinions</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/06/apple-vs-bloggers-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-18662</link>
		<dc:creator>J Rob's House of Opinions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 01:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1617#comment-18662</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;This Keeps Getting Worse&lt;/strong&gt;

The First Ammendment cannot protect one group and not another. If it fails to protect all in the realm of conscience and communication then it becomes a farce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>This Keeps Getting Worse</strong></p>
<p>The First Ammendment cannot protect one group and not another. If it fails to protect all in the realm of conscience and communication then it becomes a farce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BLATHER REVIEW</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/06/apple-vs-bloggers-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-18661</link>
		<dc:creator>BLATHER REVIEW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 19:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1617#comment-18661</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Free To Blog?&lt;/strong&gt;

Apple Computers is making a case that bloggers are not protected by laws that protect journalists from being prosecuted for refusing to reveal their sources. Michelle Malkin has a post about it (with links to other blogs with commentary). The...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Free To Blog?</strong></p>
<p>Apple Computers is making a case that bloggers are not protected by laws that protect journalists from being prosecuted for refusing to reveal their sources. Michelle Malkin has a post about it (with links to other blogs with commentary). The&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Singleton</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/06/apple-vs-bloggers-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-18660</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Singleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1617#comment-18660</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Free Flow of Information Act of 2005&lt;/strong&gt;

Potential problems in the Free Flow of Information Act of 2005</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Free Flow of Information Act of 2005</strong></p>
<p>Potential problems in the Free Flow of Information Act of 2005</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmj3e</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/06/apple-vs-bloggers-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-18659</link>
		<dc:creator>nmj3e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1617#comment-18659</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Blog regulation under McCain-Feingold&lt;/strong&gt;

There has been a recent blogalanche about the FEC&#039;s threat to regulate blogs and other informal Internet sites, which was triggered by this CNET article by Declan McCullough.  Michelle Malkin has a good round-up in two parts: one and two.  The basic idea</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blog regulation under McCain-Feingold</strong></p>
<p>There has been a recent blogalanche about the FEC&#8217;s threat to regulate blogs and other informal Internet sites, which was triggered by this CNET article by Declan McCullough.  Michelle Malkin has a good round-up in two parts: one and two.  The basic idea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capital Region People</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/06/apple-vs-bloggers-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-18658</link>
		<dc:creator>Capital Region People</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 16:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1617#comment-18658</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;2 Blog or not 2 Blog&lt;/strong&gt;

Michelle Malkin continues to be right on top of the issue, and it is wise to check her blog regularly for updates.  Bloggers have carved themselves a niche in communication... indeed, some folks, it has been reported, get their information SOLELY fro...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>2 Blog or not 2 Blog</strong></p>
<p>Michelle Malkin continues to be right on top of the issue, and it is wise to check her blog regularly for updates.  Bloggers have carved themselves a niche in communication&#8230; indeed, some folks, it has been reported, get their information SOLELY fro&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

