“Rain of fire?”

By Michelle Malkin  •  March 8, 2005 04:15 PM

Photos of Giuliana Sgrena’s car are available at http://www.repubblica.it. Click on “IMMAGINI l’auto colpita dai soldati Usa” beneath top story to view more pics.

car.jpg

I can’t see a single bullet hole. [Ed. note: besides the one in the circle that Rusty Shackleford points out, that is.]

LGF posted about this earlier today.

Update: Reader Steve Gregg writes:

Ms. Sgrena’s car appears remarkably intact having driven through, in her
words, a rain of fire, and being fired upon by a tank, as she seems to
claim. In Picture 3 in the Repubblica link I see what may be two bullet
holes near the bottom of the front windshield, driver’s side. The
headlights and grill, where the troops were aiming, look undamaged.

It appears our guys did not place many shots in this vehicle and those they
did went high. Of course, shooting high in combat is an old army problem.
Most green troops tend to fire over the heads of the enemy. That’s why the
old sergeants of a century ago told their troops to aim low and squeeze
slowly, so as not to jerk their rifle up with an excited trigger pull.
Also, if a car is rapidly advancing on you, if you fire at where the
radiator was a second ago, the windshield of that car will pull forward into
that aimpoint by the time you pulled the trigger. It looks like the troops
misjudged their lead when aiming at the speeding car. You can’t blame them.

What I also see in these pictures is good fire control by the troops. If
you feel your life is in danger, the natural reaction is to keep firing
until you run out of ammo. Often, police in a gunfight will keep shooting
until they are dry-snapping their pistols. Undisciplined troops would have
filled this car full of holes, stopping only when their magazines were
empty. I see evidence of at most two shots in the car. That is remarkable
restraint for troops fearing a car bomb is about to snuff out their lives.

Update II: Higher quality photos here.

Posted in: Iraq, Media Bias

Add your opinion

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Scared Monkeys
  2. The Jawa Report
  3. In the Bullpen
  4. Evilwhiteguy's Blog
  5. Evilwhiteguy's Blog
  6. The Jawa Report
  7. Evilwhiteguy's Blog
  8. Now You Know
  9. Myopic Zeal
  10. Pirate's Cove
  11. The Armageddon Project
  12. Air Force Voices
  13. Evilwhiteguy's Blog
  14. Secure Liberty
  15. Getting Elected Blogline
  16. RightPundit
  17. Epoch3 Blog
  18. Something... and Half of Something
  19. Something... and Half of Something
  20. Musing Minds
  21. JackLewis.net

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Two disappearing acts, one tabloid circus

June 24, 2009 10:59 AM by Michelle Malkin

53 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

Introducing the fly-by media

June 17, 2009 12:42 PM by Michelle Malkin

156 Comments | 15 Trackbacks

“The poise! The cupping!”

The Ensign affair vs. the Conyers case

June 17, 2009 06:02 AM by Michelle Malkin

38 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

What the Sacramento Bee really thinks of voters

May 21, 2009 12:26 AM by Michelle Malkin

48 Comments | 19 Trackbacks

“Misplaced anger.”

More on the fake Marine anti-war poster boy

May 15, 2009 04:48 PM by Michelle Malkin

32 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

CNN can’t count

April 29, 2009 12:39 PM by Michelle Malkin

29 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Eco-fuzzy math: Debunking a cap-and-trade debunking

April 22, 2009 10:26 AM by Michelle Malkin

67 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

Pants on fire!


Categories: Iraq, Media Bias



Pundit & Pundette

» States in dire straits

Weekly Standard

» Heavy Medal