SENS. MCCAIN AND FEINGOLD: “THERE IS NO REASON TO THINK THE FEC SHOULD OR INTENDS TO REGULATE BLOGS”
National Journal’s Technology Daily (subscription required) notes this statement posted on Sen. Russ Feingold’s web site:
As the primary Senate authors of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, we have spent years fighting to clean up elections and ensure that powerful monied interests do not drown out the voices of everyday Americans in our political system. Those interests don’t want to give up any of their power, and their main tactic has been to try to whip up fears, however unfounded and unrealistic, about reform.
The latest misinformation from the anti-reform crowd is the suggestion that our bill will require regulation of blogs and other Internet communications. A recent federal court decision requires the Federal Election Commission to open a new rulemaking on Internet communications. The FEC will be looking at whether and how paid advertising on the Internet should be treated, i.e., should it be treated differently than paid advertising on television or radio. This is an important issue — since BCRA outlawed soft money, we need to make sure that the FEC doesn’t try once again to subvert the law by creating loopholes. So far, the FEC has not even proposed new regulations. When it does so, there will be ample opportunity for comment and debate about whatever proposal the FEC makes.
This issue has nothing to with private citizens communicating on the Internet. There is simply no reason – none – to think that the FEC should or intends to regulate blogs or other Internet communications by private citizens. Suggestions to the contrary are simply the latest attempt by opponents of reform to whip up baseless fears. BCRA was intended to empower ordinary citizens, and it has been successful in doing so. We will continue to fight for that goal.
Technology Daily reports that yesterday (Monday), Rep. Christopher Shays, R-Conn., said officials must consider applying campaign-finance rules to Web-based political expenditures but added that “blogs, Internet news services and citizens acting on their own should remain free.”
At least that’s what their lips are saying now.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Nancy Pelosi Explains Why Obama Flip-Flopped on Super PACs
February 9, 2012 10:08 PM by Doug Powers
50 CommentsObama Trip to NYC on Same Night as Tree Lighting Helps Spread Holiday Cheer in Big Apple
November 30, 2011 10:48 PM by Doug Powers
44 CommentsLightSquared: Obama’s Dangerous Broadband Boondoggle
September 21, 2011 09:53 AM by Michelle Malkin
104 CommentsWhenever Obama says “millionaires, billionaires, and corporate jet owners,” substitute “Obama bundlers”
July 15, 2011 03:28 PM by Michelle Malkin
65 CommentsTrump: ‘Anthony Weiner is a Bad Guy, a Psycho’ (Does Donald Want Back the Campaign Contributions?)
June 7, 2011 06:34 PM by Doug Powers
69 CommentsHow to wipe the smirk off Stephen Colbert’s face
May 19, 2011 11:06 AM by Michelle Malkin
185 CommentsUS Chamber of Commerce Responds to US Chamber of Unemployment
October 12, 2010 09:18 AM by Doug Powers
31 Comments
Categories: Campaign finance
Pundit & Pundette
» Bishop Jenky, Nicki Minaj, and the "98%"
JustOneMinute
» We Hear From The Department Of Good Ideas And False Choices


Hot Air
» GOP budget leaders: The president’s fourth straight budget flop underscores need for reform
Pundit & Pundette
» Obama's war on conscience, cont'd

Redstate
» Media Matters











See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.