<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SENS. MCCAIN AND FEINGOLD: &#8220;THERE IS NO REASON TO THINK THE FEC SHOULD OR INTENDS TO REGULATE BLOGS&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/08/sens-mccain-and-feingold-there-is-no-reason-to-think-the-fec-should-or-intends-to-regulate-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/08/sens-mccain-and-feingold-there-is-no-reason-to-think-the-fec-should-or-intends-to-regulate-blogs/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:17:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: picurean skin care</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/08/sens-mccain-and-feingold-there-is-no-reason-to-think-the-fec-should-or-intends-to-regulate-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-18940</link>
		<dc:creator>picurean skin care</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 17:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1645#comment-18940</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;picurean skin care&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/topissues/epicurean_skin_care.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;epicurean skin care&lt;/a&gt; &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/topissues/best_skin_care_line.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;best skin care line&lt;/a&gt; &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/topissues/environ_skin_care.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;enviro...&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>picurean skin care</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://user.aol.com/topissues/epicurean_skin_care.html" rel="nofollow">epicurean skin care</a> | <a href="http://user.aol.com/topissues/best_skin_care_line.html" rel="nofollow">best skin care line</a> | <a href="http://user.aol.com/topissues/environ_skin_care.html" rel="nofollow">enviro&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samizdata.net</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/08/sens-mccain-and-feingold-there-is-no-reason-to-think-the-fec-should-or-intends-to-regulate-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-18939</link>
		<dc:creator>Samizdata.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 23:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1645#comment-18939</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Save Sam Colt&#8217;s Internet</strong></p>
<p>It has been said that the Internet, and specifically blogs, are to politics what Sam Colt’s Peacemaker was to the Wild West; an equalizer. That sentiment has apparently been taken to heart by the US Federal Election Commission because, like today’s gun&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HARD-TALK</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/08/sens-mccain-and-feingold-there-is-no-reason-to-think-the-fec-should-or-intends-to-regulate-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-18938</link>
		<dc:creator>HARD-TALK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1645#comment-18938</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Enough Already&lt;/strong&gt;

I remember when people were talking about the McCain-Feingold bill. Those of us who were still interested in the United States Constitution said, â€śThere is no way that is going to pass, it is clearly Un-Constitutionalâ€ť It was obvious to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Enough Already</strong></p>
<p>I remember when people were talking about the McCain-Feingold bill. Those of us who were still interested in the United States Constitution said, â€śThere is no way that is going to pass, it is clearly Un-Constitutionalâ€ť It was obvious to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Armageddon Project</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/08/sens-mccain-and-feingold-there-is-no-reason-to-think-the-fec-should-or-intends-to-regulate-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-18937</link>
		<dc:creator>The Armageddon Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1645#comment-18937</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Free Speech Isn&#8217;t All THAT Important</strong></p>
<p>RightWing Nuthouse has a great post about a fellow blogger who thinks the FEC trying to apply the travesty known as McCain-Feingold to the blogosphere isn&#8217;t really that big of a deal.Please note the phrase “create equality” as if the purpose of the FEC&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bennellibrothers.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/08/sens-mccain-and-feingold-there-is-no-reason-to-think-the-fec-should-or-intends-to-regulate-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-18936</link>
		<dc:creator>bennellibrothers.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 23:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1645#comment-18936</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;More campaign finance &quot;free speech&quot; reform follies&lt;/strong&gt;

Lot&#039;s more out there today on this issue. As I&#039;ve expressed HERE and HERE, the so-called reform was nothing of the sort...but I digress. Anyway, more good analysis: - Captain&#039;s Quarters...after McCain &amp; Co. says &quot;trust us&quot;. - Signposts talks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More campaign finance &#8220;free speech&#8221; reform follies</strong></p>
<p>Lot&#8217;s more out there today on this issue. As I&#8217;ve expressed HERE and HERE, the so-called reform was nothing of the sort&#8230;but I digress. Anyway, more good analysis: &#8211; Captain&#8217;s Quarters&#8230;after McCain &#038; Co. says &#8220;trust us&#8221;. &#8211; Signposts talks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheat-Seeking Missiles</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/08/sens-mccain-and-feingold-there-is-no-reason-to-think-the-fec-should-or-intends-to-regulate-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-18934</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheat-Seeking Missiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1645#comment-18934</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Barely Born, Blogs Flogged&lt;/strong&gt;

The OC Register editorial page gets it right:  This is about McCain-Feingold, not about blogging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Barely Born, Blogs Flogged</strong></p>
<p>The OC Register editorial page gets it right:  This is about McCain-Feingold, not about blogging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean's World</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/08/sens-mccain-and-feingold-there-is-no-reason-to-think-the-fec-should-or-intends-to-regulate-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-18933</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean's World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1645#comment-18933</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Chill Out? I Don&#039;t Think So&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;p&gt;FEC Commissioner Ellen Weintraub says &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/2010-1030_3-5602660.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FEC doesn&#039;t intend to regulate blogger speech&lt;/a&gt;, although she&#039;s clearly talking out of both sides of her mouth--because it appears tha...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Chill Out? I Don&#8217;t Think So</strong></p>
<p>FEC Commissioner Ellen Weintraub says <a href="http://news.com.com/2010-1030_3-5602660.html" rel="nofollow">FEC doesn&#8217;t intend to regulate blogger speech</a>, although she&#8217;s clearly talking out of both sides of her mouth&#8211;because it appears tha&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean's World</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/08/sens-mccain-and-feingold-there-is-no-reason-to-think-the-fec-should-or-intends-to-regulate-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-18932</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean's World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1645#comment-18932</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Chill Out? I Don&#039;t Think So&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;p&gt;FEC Commissioner Ellen Weintraub says &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/2010-1030_3-5602660.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FEC doesn&#039;t intend to regulate blogger speech&lt;/a&gt;, although she&#039;s clearly talking out of both sides of her mouth--because it appears tha...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Chill Out? I Don&#8217;t Think So</strong></p>
<p>FEC Commissioner Ellen Weintraub says <a href="http://news.com.com/2010-1030_3-5602660.html" rel="nofollow">FEC doesn&#8217;t intend to regulate blogger speech</a>, although she&#8217;s clearly talking out of both sides of her mouth&#8211;because it appears tha&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PunditGuy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/08/sens-mccain-and-feingold-there-is-no-reason-to-think-the-fec-should-or-intends-to-regulate-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-18931</link>
		<dc:creator>PunditGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 07:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1645#comment-18931</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Chill Out&lt;/strong&gt;

The FEC says that bloggers should relax and that reports of a plot to &quot;crack down&quot; on blogging and email are wildly exaggerated. Meanwhile, Feingold has a &quot;read my lips&quot; moment....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Chill Out</strong></p>
<p>The FEC says that bloggers should relax and that reports of a plot to &#8220;crack down&#8221; on blogging and email are wildly exaggerated. Meanwhile, Feingold has a &#8220;read my lips&#8221; moment&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Blue State Conservatives</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/08/sens-mccain-and-feingold-there-is-no-reason-to-think-the-fec-should-or-intends-to-regulate-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-18930</link>
		<dc:creator>The Blue State Conservatives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 05:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1645#comment-18930</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;No reason to believe blogs will be regulated?&lt;/strong&gt;

More news on the possibility of blogs being regulated. &quot;Technology Daily reports that yesterday (Monday), Rep. Christopher Shays, R-Conn., said officials must consider applying campaign-finance rules to Web-based political expenditures but added that &quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>No reason to believe blogs will be regulated?</strong></p>
<p>More news on the possibility of blogs being regulated. &#8220;Technology Daily reports that yesterday (Monday), Rep. Christopher Shays, R-Conn., said officials must consider applying campaign-finance rules to Web-based political expenditures but added that &#8220;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blind Mind's Eye</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/08/sens-mccain-and-feingold-there-is-no-reason-to-think-the-fec-should-or-intends-to-regulate-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-18929</link>
		<dc:creator>Blind Mind's Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 02:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1645#comment-18929</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;I can&#039;t decide whether Feingold is ignorant, a liar or both&lt;/strong&gt;

This is the official word from Senator Feingold on the FEC fiasco: As the primary Senate authors of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, we have spent years fighting to clean up elections and ensure that powerful monied interests...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I can&#8217;t decide whether Feingold is ignorant, a liar or both</strong></p>
<p>This is the official word from Senator Feingold on the FEC fiasco: As the primary Senate authors of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, we have spent years fighting to clean up elections and ensure that powerful monied interests&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hidden Nook</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/08/sens-mccain-and-feingold-there-is-no-reason-to-think-the-fec-should-or-intends-to-regulate-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-18928</link>
		<dc:creator>Hidden Nook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 02:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1645#comment-18928</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Good News for Bloggers?&lt;/strong&gt;

Certainly sounds so, although it would be good for them to close down any loop holes that arise (enough of us are already worrying as it is about being shut down).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Good News for Bloggers?</strong></p>
<p>Certainly sounds so, although it would be good for them to close down any loop holes that arise (enough of us are already worrying as it is about being shut down).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Decision '08</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/08/sens-mccain-and-feingold-there-is-no-reason-to-think-the-fec-should-or-intends-to-regulate-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-18927</link>
		<dc:creator>Decision '08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 00:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1645#comment-18927</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Quick Shots: Is Hillary Inevitable? Edition&lt;/strong&gt;

Michelle Malkin links to a statement from Russ Feingold: &quot;THERE IS NO REASON TO THINK THE FEC SHOULD OR INTENDS TO REGULATE BLOGS&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Quick Shots: Is Hillary Inevitable? Edition</strong></p>
<p>Michelle Malkin links to a statement from Russ Feingold: &#8220;THERE IS NO REASON TO THINK THE FEC SHOULD OR INTENDS TO REGULATE BLOGS&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Democracy Project</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/08/sens-mccain-and-feingold-there-is-no-reason-to-think-the-fec-should-or-intends-to-regulate-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-18926</link>
		<dc:creator>Democracy Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 00:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1645#comment-18926</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;McCain&#039;s Own Loophole, &amp; His Takeover of Local Reporting&lt;/strong&gt;

John McCain, like far too many politicians, enjoys telling others what to do. And as his efforts to promote &quot;campaign finance reform&quot; show, he also enjoys telling others what they may, or may not, say, and how they may say...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>McCain&#8217;s Own Loophole, &#038; His Takeover of Local Reporting</strong></p>
<p>John McCain, like far too many politicians, enjoys telling others what to do. And as his efforts to promote &#8220;campaign finance reform&#8221; show, he also enjoys telling others what they may, or may not, say, and how they may say&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vote for Judges</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/08/sens-mccain-and-feingold-there-is-no-reason-to-think-the-fec-should-or-intends-to-regulate-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-18925</link>
		<dc:creator>Vote for Judges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 00:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1645#comment-18925</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;It&#039;s speech, dammit!&lt;/strong&gt;

I ain&#039;t buyin&#039; it. If the courts allow Congress to regulate speech, Congress will regulate speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>It&#8217;s speech, dammit!</strong></p>
<p>I ain&#8217;t buyin&#8217; it. If the courts allow Congress to regulate speech, Congress will regulate speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
