<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FEC VS. BLOGS UPDATE: BRAD SMITH VINDICATED?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/25/fec-vs-blogs-update-brad-smith-vindicated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/25/fec-vs-blogs-update-brad-smith-vindicated/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:14:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: skin care doctors</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/25/fec-vs-blogs-update-brad-smith-vindicated/comment-page-1/#comment-20267</link>
		<dc:creator>skin care doctors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 03:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1778#comment-20267</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;skin care doctors&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/topissues/obaji_skin_care.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;obaji skin care&lt;/a&gt; &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/topissues/collagen_skin_care.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;collagen skin care&lt;/a&gt; &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/topissues/skin_care_doctors.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;skin care doctor...&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>skin care doctors</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://user.aol.com/topissues/obaji_skin_care.html" rel="nofollow">obaji skin care</a> | <a href="http://user.aol.com/topissues/collagen_skin_care.html" rel="nofollow">collagen skin care</a> | <a href="http://user.aol.com/topissues/skin_care_doctors.html" rel="nofollow">skin care doctor&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: desktop strippers</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/25/fec-vs-blogs-update-brad-smith-vindicated/comment-page-1/#comment-20265</link>
		<dc:creator>desktop strippers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1778#comment-20265</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;desktop strippers&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://wapurl.co.uk/?O2IM7WI&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;desktop strippers&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>desktop strippers</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://wapurl.co.uk/?O2IM7WI" rel="nofollow">desktop strippers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HARD-TALK</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/25/fec-vs-blogs-update-brad-smith-vindicated/comment-page-1/#comment-20264</link>
		<dc:creator>HARD-TALK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1778#comment-20264</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Enough Already&lt;/strong&gt;

I remember when people were talking about the McCain-Feingold bill. Those of us who were still interested in the United States Constitution said, “There is no way that is going to pass, it is clearly Un-Constitutional” It was obvious to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Enough Already</strong></p>
<p>I remember when people were talking about the McCain-Feingold bill. Those of us who were still interested in the United States Constitution said, “There is no way that is going to pass, it is clearly Un-Constitutional” It was obvious to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darth Apathy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/25/fec-vs-blogs-update-brad-smith-vindicated/comment-page-1/#comment-20263</link>
		<dc:creator>Darth Apathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1778#comment-20263</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bring &#039;Em On, Part Deux&lt;/strong&gt;

When Bradley Smith blew the whistle on this flagrant assault on the First Amendment, he was dismissed as being barking mad. Well, it turns out that Smith wasn&#039;t the one who&#039;s barking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bring &#8216;Em On, Part Deux</strong></p>
<p>When Bradley Smith blew the whistle on this flagrant assault on the First Amendment, he was dismissed as being barking mad. Well, it turns out that Smith wasn&#8217;t the one who&#8217;s barking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darth Apathy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/25/fec-vs-blogs-update-brad-smith-vindicated/comment-page-1/#comment-20262</link>
		<dc:creator>Darth Apathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1778#comment-20262</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;From My Cold Dead Hands, Part Deux&lt;/strong&gt;

When Bradley Smith blew the whistle on this flagrant assault on the First Amendment, he was dismissed as being barking mad. Well, it turns out that Smith wasn&#039;t the one who&#039;s barking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>From My Cold Dead Hands, Part Deux</strong></p>
<p>When Bradley Smith blew the whistle on this flagrant assault on the First Amendment, he was dismissed as being barking mad. Well, it turns out that Smith wasn&#8217;t the one who&#8217;s barking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Shawn Barber's Corner</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/25/fec-vs-blogs-update-brad-smith-vindicated/comment-page-1/#comment-20261</link>
		<dc:creator>La Shawn Barber's Corner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1778#comment-20261</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;FEC v. The Loud and Unruly&lt;/strong&gt;

How appropriate that I choose to invoke the First Amendment (see post below) on the very day the Federal Election Commission (FEC) held a hearing on regulation of the Internet. You may recall that a few weeks ago that FEC Commissioner Bradley Smith war...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>FEC v. The Loud and Unruly</strong></p>
<p>How appropriate that I choose to invoke the First Amendment (see post below) on the very day the Federal Election Commission (FEC) held a hearing on regulation of the Internet. You may recall that a few weeks ago that FEC Commissioner Bradley Smith war&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L'Ombre de l'Olivier</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/03/25/fec-vs-blogs-update-brad-smith-vindicated/comment-page-1/#comment-20260</link>
		<dc:creator>L'Ombre de l'Olivier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 14:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1778#comment-20260</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The FEC, the World and the Internet&lt;/strong&gt;

The outcry over the USA&#039;s FEC and its attempts to regulate blogs reminds me of nothing more than the censorship attempts of regimes such as communist China or intolerant Saudi Arabia to stop their citizens from reading stuff that annoys the governmen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The FEC, the World and the Internet</strong></p>
<p>The outcry over the USA&#8217;s FEC and its attempts to regulate blogs reminds me of nothing more than the censorship attempts of regimes such as communist China or intolerant Saudi Arabia to stop their citizens from reading stuff that annoys the governmen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
