<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CONTROVERSY OVER PULITZER-WINNING AP PHOTOS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/05/controversy-over-pulitzer-winning-ap-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/05/controversy-over-pulitzer-winning-ap-photos/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:22:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Riding Sun</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/05/controversy-over-pulitzer-winning-ap-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-21631</link>
		<dc:creator>Riding Sun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 13:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1876#comment-21631</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Analyzing the AP&#039;s Pulitzer-winning photos&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;i&gt;NOTE (added May 22):  Welcome, Daily Kos readers!  Really, I mean it.  Thoughtful comments from any political perspective are always appreciated here.&lt;/i&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Analyzing the AP&#8217;s Pulitzer-winning photos</strong></p>
<p><i>NOTE (added May 22):  Welcome, Daily Kos readers!  Really, I mean it.  Thoughtful comments from any political perspective are always appreciated here.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riding Sun</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/05/controversy-over-pulitzer-winning-ap-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-21630</link>
		<dc:creator>Riding Sun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 13:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1876#comment-21630</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Analyzing the AP&#039;s Pulitzer-winning photos&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;i&gt;NOTE (added May 22):  Welcome, Daily Kos readers!  Really, I mean it.  Thoughtful comments from any political perspective are always appreciated here.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Analyzing the AP&#8217;s Pulitzer-winning photos</strong></p>
<p><i>NOTE (added May 22):  Welcome, Daily Kos readers!  Really, I mean it.  Thoughtful comments from any political perspective are always appreciated here.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/05/controversy-over-pulitzer-winning-ap-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-21629</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 08:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1876#comment-21629</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;http://thinkdude.com/v-web/b2/index.php?m=200504&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://thinkdude.com/v-web/b2/index.php?m=200504" rel="nofollow">http://thinkdude.com/v-web/b2/index.php?m=200504</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Far East Cynic</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/05/controversy-over-pulitzer-winning-ap-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-21628</link>
		<dc:creator>Far East Cynic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1876#comment-21628</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;From around the blogosphere, things to see and rea&lt;/strong&gt;

Namely, they are upset that the photographers did not get shot themselves while photographing the news. While these photos are of tragic things, they do not seem out of context for other Pulitzer Prize photography. Or has Michelle Malkin et al forgot...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>From around the blogosphere, things to see and rea</strong></p>
<p>Namely, they are upset that the photographers did not get shot themselves while photographing the news. While these photos are of tragic things, they do not seem out of context for other Pulitzer Prize photography. Or has Michelle Malkin et al forgot&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Air Force Voices</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/05/controversy-over-pulitzer-winning-ap-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-21627</link>
		<dc:creator>Air Force Voices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 05:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1876#comment-21627</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;CBS Cameraman Arrested in Iraq&lt;/strong&gt;

Iraqi citizens informed on CBS cameraman, leading to his arrest by coalition forces: Greyhawk is all over this one! Sisyphean Musings has the original post. The Associated Press (AP) has this to say:April 8, 2005, 2:30 PM EDT BAGHDAD, Iraq</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>CBS Cameraman Arrested in Iraq</strong></p>
<p>Iraqi citizens informed on CBS cameraman, leading to his arrest by coalition forces: Greyhawk is all over this one! Sisyphean Musings has the original post. The Associated Press (AP) has this to say:April 8, 2005, 2:30 PM EDT BAGHDAD, Iraq</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron's cc:</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/05/controversy-over-pulitzer-winning-ap-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-21626</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron's cc:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 05:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1876#comment-21626</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pulitzer 2005 Photography Judges&lt;/strong&gt;

Denis Finley, managing editor, The Virginian-Pilot, Norfolk, VA (Chair)
	*J. Ross Baughman, director of photography, The Washington Times
	Eric Newton, director of journalism initiatives, John S. and James L. Knight Foundation,
Miami, FL
	Larry ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pulitzer 2005 Photography Judges</strong></p>
<p>Denis Finley, managing editor, The Virginian-Pilot, Norfolk, VA (Chair)<br />
	*J. Ross Baughman, director of photography, The Washington Times<br />
	Eric Newton, director of journalism initiatives, John S. and James L. Knight Foundation,<br />
Miami, FL<br />
	Larry &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geekery Today</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/05/controversy-over-pulitzer-winning-ap-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-21625</link>
		<dc:creator>Geekery Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 20:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1876#comment-21625</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Righteous Indignation&lt;/strong&gt;

Like the Great Americans at Riding Sun (2005-04-05), The Jawa Report (2005-04-04), Michelle Malkin (2005-04-05), et al., I am outraged at the obvious, slavish political...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Righteous Indignation</strong></p>
<p>Like the Great Americans at Riding Sun (2005-04-05), The Jawa Report (2005-04-04), Michelle Malkin (2005-04-05), et al., I am outraged at the obvious, slavish political&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Southpaw</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/05/controversy-over-pulitzer-winning-ap-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-21624</link>
		<dc:creator>Southpaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 08:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1876#comment-21624</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pretty Pictures, Please&lt;/strong&gt;

Pity Hindrocket and Malkin who have trouble thinking logically. The AP photographer was &quot;within a few yards of the scene.&quot; Ergo, he must be working with the terrorists! Have these folks never heard of telephoto lens? Yes, folks, we have...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pretty Pictures, Please</strong></p>
<p>Pity Hindrocket and Malkin who have trouble thinking logically. The AP photographer was &#8220;within a few yards of the scene.&#8221; Ergo, he must be working with the terrorists! Have these folks never heard of telephoto lens? Yes, folks, we have&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resonant Information</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/05/controversy-over-pulitzer-winning-ap-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-21623</link>
		<dc:creator>Resonant Information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 04:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1876#comment-21623</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pulitzer prizes, shootings, and lies&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In addition to the Pulitzer prize given to a feminist at the Cleveland Plain Dealer that I &lt;a href=&quot;/node/606&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wrote about earlier&lt;/a&gt;, various Pulitzer prizes in photography have gone out to various photographers covering the war.  What with it being &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pulitzer prizes, shootings, and lies</strong></p>
<p>In addition to the Pulitzer prize given to a feminist at the Cleveland Plain Dealer that I <a href="/node/606" rel="nofollow">wrote about earlier</a>, various Pulitzer prizes in photography have gone out to various photographers covering the war.  What with it being </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Population: One</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/05/controversy-over-pulitzer-winning-ap-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-21622</link>
		<dc:creator>Population: One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 23:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1876#comment-21622</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Trust in advertising&lt;/strong&gt;

A few months ago, Ryan of the Dead Parrot Society debunked the claim that certain photographs of an execution on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Trust in advertising</strong></p>
<p>A few months ago, Ryan of the Dead Parrot Society debunked the claim that certain photographs of an execution on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Conservative</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/05/controversy-over-pulitzer-winning-ap-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-21621</link>
		<dc:creator>California Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 20:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1876#comment-21621</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Nothing To Laugh About&lt;/strong&gt;

While the recent controversy over the Pulitzer-winning photographs by the AP continues to percolate, Michelle Malkin also draws our attention to an examination of this year&#039;s Pulitzer-winning cartoons. 

Powerline puts a handful on display.

It&#039;s ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nothing To Laugh About</strong></p>
<p>While the recent controversy over the Pulitzer-winning photographs by the AP continues to percolate, Michelle Malkin also draws our attention to an examination of this year&#8217;s Pulitzer-winning cartoons. </p>
<p>Powerline puts a handful on display.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technicalities</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/05/controversy-over-pulitzer-winning-ap-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-21620</link>
		<dc:creator>Technicalities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 08:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1876#comment-21620</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;I&#039;d Like to Thank the Academy...&lt;/strong&gt;

It&#039;s everywhere on the blogs... from Michelle Malkin to Blackfive... outrage over the Pulitzer Prizes awarded to photo &quot;journalism&quot;. As far as I can tell, there seems to be no difference between the Pulitzers, Nobel, and Academy Awards... (personally I...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I&#8217;d Like to Thank the Academy&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s everywhere on the blogs&#8230; from Michelle Malkin to Blackfive&#8230; outrage over the Pulitzer Prizes awarded to photo &#8220;journalism&#8221;. As far as I can tell, there seems to be no difference between the Pulitzers, Nobel, and Academy Awards&#8230; (personally I&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dizzy Girl</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/05/controversy-over-pulitzer-winning-ap-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-21619</link>
		<dc:creator>Dizzy Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 06:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1876#comment-21619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;http://WWW.Dizzy-Girl.Net/archives/000779.php&lt;/strong&gt;

Michelle Malkin posted about the Pulitzer-Winning AP Photos and the controversy surrounding this photo. And in this post, she nominates her own personal favorites, which includes one of my personal favorites, The Smoking Marine: Great photo! It&#039;s a cla...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://WWW.Dizzy-Girl.Net/archives/000779.php" rel="nofollow">http://WWW.Dizzy-Girl.Net/archives/000779.php</a></strong></p>
<p>Michelle Malkin posted about the Pulitzer-Winning AP Photos and the controversy surrounding this photo. And in this post, she nominates her own personal favorites, which includes one of my personal favorites, The Smoking Marine: Great photo! It&#8217;s a cla&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ninme</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/05/controversy-over-pulitzer-winning-ap-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-21618</link>
		<dc:creator>ninme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 23:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1876#comment-21618</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Stupid Pulitzer&lt;/strong&gt;

So, everyone&#8217;s in a dither over one of this year&#8217;s Pulitzer-winning AP photos. Michelle Malkin has a lovely roundup of the riteous indignation, as she usually does. She submits a couple alternatives, which, I have to say, aren&#8217;t good ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Stupid Pulitzer</strong></p>
<p>So, everyone&#8217;s in a dither over one of this year&#8217;s Pulitzer-winning AP photos. Michelle Malkin has a lovely roundup of the riteous indignation, as she usually does. She submits a couple alternatives, which, I have to say, aren&#8217;t good &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soccer Dad</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/05/controversy-over-pulitzer-winning-ap-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-21617</link>
		<dc:creator>Soccer Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1876#comment-21617</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The degradation of the AP&lt;/strong&gt;

AP photographer Eddie Adams won a Pulitzer Prize in 1969 for a photograph showing Lt. Col. Nguyen Ngoc Loan executing a prisoner. It was an image that defined Eddie Adams&#039; career. But he had some remorse. But fame -- instant,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The degradation of the AP</strong></p>
<p>AP photographer Eddie Adams won a Pulitzer Prize in 1969 for a photograph showing Lt. Col. Nguyen Ngoc Loan executing a prisoner. It was an image that defined Eddie Adams&#8217; career. But he had some remorse. But fame &#8212; instant,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
