<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BUSH: I&#8217;M CLUELESS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/15/bush-im-clueless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/15/bush-im-clueless/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:23:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carpe Bonum</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/15/bush-im-clueless/comment-page-1/#comment-22680</link>
		<dc:creator>Carpe Bonum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 09:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1948#comment-22680</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;WSJ wrong on Passports for day-trippers&lt;/strong&gt;

It is rare, but today I split from the Wall Street Journal on border security. An unsigned editorial headlined Passport Paranoia (link for subscribers only) states: Burdening Americans with daily passport checks is the bureaucratic thing to do: It&#039;s ha...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>WSJ wrong on Passports for day-trippers</strong></p>
<p>It is rare, but today I split from the Wall Street Journal on border security. An unsigned editorial headlined Passport Paranoia (link for subscribers only) states: Burdening Americans with daily passport checks is the bureaucratic thing to do: It&#8217;s ha&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carpe Bonum</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/15/bush-im-clueless/comment-page-1/#comment-22679</link>
		<dc:creator>Carpe Bonum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 01:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1948#comment-22679</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;WSJ wrong on Passports for day-trippers&lt;/strong&gt;

It is rare, but today I split from the Wall Street Journal on border security. An unsigned editorial headlined Passport Paranoia (link for subscribers only) states: Burdening Americans with daily passport checks is the bureaucratic thing to do: It&#039;s ha...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>WSJ wrong on Passports for day-trippers</strong></p>
<p>It is rare, but today I split from the Wall Street Journal on border security. An unsigned editorial headlined Passport Paranoia (link for subscribers only) states: Burdening Americans with daily passport checks is the bureaucratic thing to do: It&#8217;s ha&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carpe Bonum</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/15/bush-im-clueless/comment-page-1/#comment-22678</link>
		<dc:creator>Carpe Bonum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1948#comment-22678</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;WSJ wrong on Passports for day-trippers&lt;/strong&gt;

It is rare, but today I split from the Wall Street Journal on border security. An unsigned editorial headlined Passport Paranoia (link for subscribers only) states: Burdening Americans with daily passport checks is the bureaucratic thing to do: It&#039;s ha...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>WSJ wrong on Passports for day-trippers</strong></p>
<p>It is rare, but today I split from the Wall Street Journal on border security. An unsigned editorial headlined Passport Paranoia (link for subscribers only) states: Burdening Americans with daily passport checks is the bureaucratic thing to do: It&#8217;s ha&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enlightenment Reactionary</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/15/bush-im-clueless/comment-page-1/#comment-22677</link>
		<dc:creator>Enlightenment Reactionary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2005 20:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1948#comment-22677</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bush says: &quot;What? Me worry?&lt;/strong&gt;

Ironically, right after my last post I read in Michelle Malkin&#039;s blog that &quot;W&quot; was surprised by a provision in a law that he signed into law last year. It seems strangely fitting that a common sense security measure passed into law because Bush didn&#039;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bush says: &#8220;What? Me worry?</strong></p>
<p>Ironically, right after my last post I read in Michelle Malkin&#8217;s blog that &#8220;W&#8221; was surprised by a provision in a law that he signed into law last year. It seems strangely fitting that a common sense security measure passed into law because Bush didn&#8217;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iowa Voice</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/15/bush-im-clueless/comment-page-1/#comment-22676</link>
		<dc:creator>Iowa Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2005 01:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=1948#comment-22676</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;One Thing I Cannot Support The President On&lt;/strong&gt;

You know, I&#039;ve had this blog site up for about a month now, and I&#039;ve gotten a few emails already saying how I&#039;m &quot;cheerleading&quot; Bush and the Republican Party, and so on.  I&#039;ve mentioned this before, but I&#039;ll say it again, because it bears repeating:

The</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>One Thing I Cannot Support The President On</strong></p>
<p>You know, I&#8217;ve had this blog site up for about a month now, and I&#8217;ve gotten a few emails already saying how I&#8217;m &#8220;cheerleading&#8221; Bush and the Republican Party, and so on.  I&#8217;ve mentioned this before, but I&#8217;ll say it again, because it bears repeating:</p>
<p>The</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
