THE FELON SWING VOTE

By Michelle Malkin  •  May 5, 2005 09:11 AM

Earlier this year, Jenny Durkan, a lawyer for Washington State Democrats, said there was no evidence of voting by felons in last fall’s contested gubernatorial election:

“The Republican Party and [GOP gubernatorial candidate Dino] Rossi have repeated in many forms that felons have voted in this election, yet they have not provided proof of a single such vote. “

Democrats now acknowledge that 544 felons in Rossi-leaning districts voted illegally in last fall’s gubernatorial election.

While there is no way to know how those felons voted, the experience of Florida in 2000 is instructive. According to Lowell Ponte,

In 2000 an estimated 10,000 felons voted illegally in Florida. Where their voter registration was checked, 85 percent of these convicted felons were registered as Democrats.

Even if only 544 felons voted in Washington State last fall and 85 percent of them voted for Gregoire, the felons changed a 252-vote Rossi victory into a 129-vote Gregoire victory.

That understates the impact of the felon vote because it’s limited to the 544 felon voters that Democrats have identified in Rossi-leaning districts. Republicans have documented hundreds more felon voters in Gregoire-leaning districts. Based on the Florida numbers, it’s reasonable to assume that a majority of felons in all districts, both Rossi-leaning and Gregoire-leaning, voted for Gregoire.

Bottom line: if felons had been prohibited from voting last fall, as the law requires, Rossi almost certainly would be governor today.

Oh, and on a related note, Hillary Clinton continues to push her Felon Voter Access Act. Check this out:

A recent study by Jeff Manza and Marcus Britton of Northwestern University and Christopher Uggen of the University of Minnesota found that 30 percent of felons would vote if Hillary’s law was passed. That’s 1.4 million new voters.

With 85 percent of felon voters statistically likely to vote Democrat, that could add up to 1.2 million votes to presidential candidate Clinton’s tally in 2008.

In a close race, that’s more than enough to put her over the top.

Posted in: Hillary Clinton

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. The Loudest Cricket
  2. killrighty.net
  3. HARD-TALK
  4. Media Lies
  5. Dangerous Dan
  6. Eyes On The Ball News
  7. Generation Why?
  8. Rabbi Philosopher
  9. Joust The Facts
  10. JackLewis.net
  11. ROFASix
  12. Truth Out Loud
  13. Mary Katharine Ham
  14. Mary Katharine Ham
  15. Mary Katharine Ham

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Why is Hillary laughing?

April 9, 2009 03:02 PM by Doug Powers

98 Comments | 17 Trackbacks

North Korea to put American journalists on trial

March 30, 2009 03:17 PM by Michelle Malkin

57 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

“Botchmen”

March 10, 2009 11:05 AM by Michelle Malkin

37 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Global cooling moment of the day

January 20, 2009 06:03 PM by Michelle Malkin

44 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Chilly.

A bittersweet Hillary/Jawn Kerry moment Updated

January 13, 2009 10:58 AM by Michelle Malkin

14 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Oh, what might have been.

Hillary’s pay-for-play troubles, continued

January 13, 2009 09:33 AM by Michelle Malkin

48 Comments | 14 Trackbacks


Categories: Hillary Clinton



Pundit & Pundette

» About last night's vote

JustOneMinute

» "Unequivocal"?

Commentary

» Flotsam and Jetsam
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook