<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MORE OF NEWSWEEK&#8217;S BLAME-THE-PENTAGON SPIN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/16/more-of-newsweeks-blame-the-pentagon-spin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/16/more-of-newsweeks-blame-the-pentagon-spin/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:07:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6180-unclaimed money</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/16/more-of-newsweeks-blame-the-pentagon-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-26579</link>
		<dc:creator>6180-unclaimed money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 19:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2233#comment-26579</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;unclaimed money-6180&lt;/strong&gt;

unclaimed money</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>unclaimed money-6180</strong></p>
<p>unclaimed money</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quit smoking 4916</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/16/more-of-newsweeks-blame-the-pentagon-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-26578</link>
		<dc:creator>Quit smoking 4916</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 07:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2233#comment-26578</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Quit smoking 4916&lt;/strong&gt;

1164287832 Quit smoking</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Quit smoking 4916</strong></p>
<p>1164287832 Quit smoking</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: professional skin care</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/16/more-of-newsweeks-blame-the-pentagon-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-26577</link>
		<dc:creator>professional skin care</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 15:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2233#comment-26577</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;professional skin care&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/topissues/skin_care_brands.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;skin care brands&lt;/a&gt; &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/topissues/professional_skin_care.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;professional skin care&lt;/a&gt; &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/topissues/laser_skin_care.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;laser sk...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>professional skin care</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://user.aol.com/topissues/skin_care_brands.html" rel="nofollow">skin care brands</a> | <a href="http://user.aol.com/topissues/professional_skin_care.html" rel="nofollow">professional skin care</a> | <a href="http://user.aol.com/topissues/laser_skin_care.html" rel="nofollow">laser sk&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: camedwards.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/16/more-of-newsweeks-blame-the-pentagon-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-26575</link>
		<dc:creator>camedwards.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 18:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2233#comment-26575</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Re: Question&lt;/strong&gt;

Farrah, they have apologized. &#039;We regret that we got any part of our story wrong&#039; is what Mark Whitaker says in the magazine and we extend our sympathy to the victims of the violence, and just as important by the...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Re: Question</strong></p>
<p>Farrah, they have apologized. &#8216;We regret that we got any part of our story wrong&#8217; is what Mark Whitaker says in the magazine and we extend our sympathy to the victims of the violence, and just as important by the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ConservativeOutpost.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/16/more-of-newsweeks-blame-the-pentagon-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-26574</link>
		<dc:creator>ConservativeOutpost.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 17:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2233#comment-26574</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Newsweek lied...people died&lt;/strong&gt;

Chalk up another colossal blow to the credibility of the &quot;mainstream media&quot; w/the revelation (and now admission) that the Newsweek story about US military officials flushing the Koran down the toilet as a means of interrogating detainees in the...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Newsweek lied&#8230;people died</strong></p>
<p>Chalk up another colossal blow to the credibility of the &#8220;mainstream media&#8221; w/the revelation (and now admission) that the Newsweek story about US military officials flushing the Koran down the toilet as a means of interrogating detainees in the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reasoned audacity</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/16/more-of-newsweeks-blame-the-pentagon-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-26573</link>
		<dc:creator>reasoned audacity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 06:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2233#comment-26573</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Newsweek&#039;s Retraction:  If this is recanting, what would &lt;em&gt;j&#039;accuse&lt;/em&gt; look like?&lt;/strong&gt;

The blogosphere is abuzz with the Newsweek &quot;retraction.&quot; But I&#039;ve just finished reading Evan Thomas&#039; &quot;How a Fire Broke Out&quot; and it sounds more like J&#039;accuse -- a reassertion of their accusation -- to me. They&#039;re just looking for a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Newsweek&#8217;s Retraction:  If this is recanting, what would <em>j&#8217;accuse</em> look like?</strong></p>
<p>The blogosphere is abuzz with the Newsweek &#8220;retraction.&#8221; But I&#8217;ve just finished reading Evan Thomas&#8217; &#8220;How a Fire Broke Out&#8221; and it sounds more like J&#8217;accuse &#8212; a reassertion of their accusation &#8212; to me. They&#8217;re just looking for a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The American Mind</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/16/more-of-newsweeks-blame-the-pentagon-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-26572</link>
		<dc:creator>The American Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 05:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2233#comment-26572</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Criticizing the Critcs&lt;/strong&gt;

Any news junkie knows about Newsweek&#039;s Quran desecration story and retraction. For those that don&#039;t here&#039;s the gist: Newsweek reported...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Criticizing the Critcs</strong></p>
<p>Any news junkie knows about Newsweek&#8217;s Quran desecration story and retraction. For those that don&#8217;t here&#8217;s the gist: Newsweek reported&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The American Mind</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/16/more-of-newsweeks-blame-the-pentagon-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-26571</link>
		<dc:creator>The American Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 05:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2233#comment-26571</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Criticizing the Critcs&lt;/strong&gt;

Any news junkie knows about Newsweek&#039;s Quran desecration story and retraction. For those that don&#039;t here&#039;s the gist: Newsweek reported...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Criticizing the Critcs</strong></p>
<p>Any news junkie knows about Newsweek&#8217;s Quran desecration story and retraction. For those that don&#8217;t here&#8217;s the gist: Newsweek reported&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right As Usual</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/16/more-of-newsweeks-blame-the-pentagon-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-26570</link>
		<dc:creator>Right As Usual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 04:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2233#comment-26570</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;WOODWARD &amp; BERNSTEIN DID IT!&lt;/strong&gt;

when Woodward/Bernstein tried the phone countdown trick, it bit them in the butt - it caused a mis-understanding, and led to one of the few stories that was challenged on the facts - just like this recent story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>WOODWARD &#038; BERNSTEIN DID IT!</strong></p>
<p>when Woodward/Bernstein tried the phone countdown trick, it bit them in the butt &#8211; it caused a mis-understanding, and led to one of the few stories that was challenged on the facts &#8211; just like this recent story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizen Journal Blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/16/more-of-newsweeks-blame-the-pentagon-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-26569</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizen Journal Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 03:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2233#comment-26569</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Questions for Newsweek&lt;/strong&gt;

When Dick Thornburgh’s report on Rather-gate became public in January, John Hinderaker at Powerline penned a cogent response, one that both praised it as “better than expected” and questioned why it “walks to the precipice, but declines to jump...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Questions for Newsweek</strong></p>
<p>When Dick Thornburgh’s report on Rather-gate became public in January, John Hinderaker at Powerline penned a cogent response, one that both praised it as “better than expected” and questioned why it “walks to the precipice, but declines to jump&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Common Room</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/16/more-of-newsweeks-blame-the-pentagon-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-26568</link>
		<dc:creator>The Common Room</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 01:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2233#comment-26568</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;More On Newsweek&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More On Newsweek</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: camedwards.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/16/more-of-newsweeks-blame-the-pentagon-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-26567</link>
		<dc:creator>camedwards.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 00:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2233#comment-26567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Newsweek Retracts&lt;/strong&gt;

Newsweek has retracted its story on Koran desecration at Gitmo. So what happens now? A prediction: - the rhetoric about Newsweek heats up instead of dying down. The next big story in Washington is the fight over the judicial nominations,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Newsweek Retracts</strong></p>
<p>Newsweek has retracted its story on Koran desecration at Gitmo. So what happens now? A prediction: &#8211; the rhetoric about Newsweek heats up instead of dying down. The next big story in Washington is the fight over the judicial nominations,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media Lies</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/16/more-of-newsweeks-blame-the-pentagon-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-26566</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Lies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 00:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2233#comment-26566</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Newsweek loses Boston radio station&lt;/strong&gt;

Newsweek is losing Boston&#039;s WRKO-AM, in part, because of the flap over the Koran.  (It should be noted that the station was already planni...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Newsweek loses Boston radio station</strong></p>
<p>Newsweek is losing Boston&#8217;s WRKO-AM, in part, because of the flap over the Koran.  (It should be noted that the station was already planni&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tapscott's Copy Desk</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/16/more-of-newsweeks-blame-the-pentagon-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-26565</link>
		<dc:creator>Tapscott's Copy Desk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 23:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2233#comment-26565</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Was Newsweek&#039;s Story Too Good Not to be True?&lt;/strong&gt;

Newsweek went ahead and published despite its failure to independent verfify its lone source&#039;s credibility. Journalism 101 would have required holding off publication until additional reporting and verification could be conducted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Was Newsweek&#8217;s Story Too Good Not to be True?</strong></p>
<p>Newsweek went ahead and published despite its failure to independent verfify its lone source&#8217;s credibility. Journalism 101 would have required holding off publication until additional reporting and verification could be conducted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iowa Voice</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/16/more-of-newsweeks-blame-the-pentagon-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-26564</link>
		<dc:creator>Iowa Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 23:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2233#comment-26564</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Keeping It In Perspective&lt;/strong&gt;

I have to disagree with Clayton Cramer in regards to the new mantra &quot;Newsweek lied,people died&quot;:

As long as we remember that this is satire, we are okay. At this point, the evidence is not that Newsweek intentionally lied, but that they were misled, an</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Keeping It In Perspective</strong></p>
<p>I have to disagree with Clayton Cramer in regards to the new mantra &#8220;Newsweek lied,people died&#8221;:</p>
<p>As long as we remember that this is satire, we are okay. At this point, the evidence is not that Newsweek intentionally lied, but that they were misled, an</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

