<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SOCIAL SECURITY COMPROMISE?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/25/social-security-compromise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/25/social-security-compromise/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:41:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: betting horse racing</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/25/social-security-compromise/comment-page-1/#comment-27658</link>
		<dc:creator>betting horse racing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2301#comment-27658</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;horse betting system&lt;/strong&gt;

betting on horse</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>horse betting system</strong></p>
<p>betting on horse</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Threshold Negative 55 - The Action Potential of Rational Thought</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/25/social-security-compromise/comment-page-1/#comment-27657</link>
		<dc:creator>Threshold Negative 55 - The Action Potential of Rational Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 19:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2301#comment-27657</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What is happening to the GOP? The Writing is on the wall!!&lt;/strong&gt;

Well, the honeymoon is over. It is official; the GOP is selling my vote right down the river. I am sorry but when I voted for Republicans I voted for a conservative agenda. Interpreted that meant permanent tax relief (not...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What is happening to the GOP? The Writing is on the wall!!</strong></p>
<p>Well, the honeymoon is over. It is official; the GOP is selling my vote right down the river. I am sorry but when I voted for Republicans I voted for a conservative agenda. Interpreted that meant permanent tax relief (not&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bRight &#38; Early</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/25/social-security-compromise/comment-page-1/#comment-27656</link>
		<dc:creator>bRight &#38; Early</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 22:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2301#comment-27656</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social Insecurity&lt;/strong&gt;

How can anyone with a 401k, or even a savings account of their own, continue to have trouble with President Bush&#039;s suggestion of private accounts for inclusion in any Social Security fix. The options without private accounts are like trying to fix a ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social Insecurity</strong></p>
<p>How can anyone with a 401k, or even a savings account of their own, continue to have trouble with President Bush&#8217;s suggestion of private accounts for inclusion in any Social Security fix. The options without private accounts are like trying to fix a &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Country Store</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/25/social-security-compromise/comment-page-1/#comment-27655</link>
		<dc:creator>Country Store</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 14:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2301#comment-27655</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;BOHICA&lt;/strong&gt;

Peggy Noonan provides some laughs in &quot;Mr. Narcissus Goes to Washington&quot; and as usual they&#039;re on us...

The folks back home mostly hold their noses at election time and vote for the one that smells least. About now, these clowns are pretty ripe and ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BOHICA</strong></p>
<p>Peggy Noonan provides some laughs in &#8220;Mr. Narcissus Goes to Washington&#8221; and as usual they&#8217;re on us&#8230;</p>
<p>The folks back home mostly hold their noses at election time and vote for the one that smells least. About now, these clowns are pretty ripe and &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enlighten-New Jersey</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/25/social-security-compromise/comment-page-1/#comment-27654</link>
		<dc:creator>Enlighten-New Jersey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 06:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2301#comment-27654</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Compromise: Fix Social Security On The Backs Of Ne&lt;/strong&gt;

Social Security produces a lousy return on investment for many American workers as it is now. Eliminating the wage cap will not improve the program&#8217;s long term sustainability, but will certainly hurt the individual trying to save their own mone...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Compromise: Fix Social Security On The Backs Of Ne</strong></p>
<p>Social Security produces a lousy return on investment for many American workers as it is now. Eliminating the wage cap will not improve the program&#8217;s long term sustainability, but will certainly hurt the individual trying to save their own mone&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media Lies</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/25/social-security-compromise/comment-page-1/#comment-27653</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Lies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 04:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2301#comment-27653</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Yet more evidence that conservatives....&lt;/strong&gt;

....should abandon the Republican party.&lt;blockquote&gt;BusinessWeek says Congress and the White House are inching toward a compromise on Social Security. Private accounts will not...&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Yet more evidence that conservatives&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;.should abandon the Republican party.<br />
<blockquote>BusinessWeek says Congress and the White House are inching toward a compromise on Social Security. Private accounts will not&#8230;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garfield Ridge</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/25/social-security-compromise/comment-page-1/#comment-27652</link>
		<dc:creator>Garfield Ridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 03:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2301#comment-27652</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;So, What&#039;s That Social Security Reform Plan Again?&lt;/strong&gt;

Via Michelle Malkin, Business Week is reporting that both parties are</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>So, What&#8217;s That Social Security Reform Plan Again?</strong></p>
<p>Via Michelle Malkin, Business Week is reporting that both parties are</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gall &#38; Wormwood</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/25/social-security-compromise/comment-page-1/#comment-27651</link>
		<dc:creator>Gall &#38; Wormwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 01:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2301#comment-27651</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Is Dubya losing his lips?</strong></p>
<p>Looks like Social Securityš is going to get the filibuster treatment; lots of sound and fury, then a backroom deal cutting the legs from under the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/25/social-security-compromise/comment-page-1/#comment-27650</link>
		<dc:creator>FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 00:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2301#comment-27650</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social Security Sell-Out Deal?&lt;/strong&gt;

Michelle Malkin has a piece about our good friends the Senate Mavericks and how they are selling out the American people on Social Security Reform.  Read the piece here:
	BusinessWeek says Congress and the White House are inching toward a compromise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social Security Sell-Out Deal?</strong></p>
<p>Michelle Malkin has a piece about our good friends the Senate Mavericks and how they are selling out the American people on Social Security Reform.  Read the piece here:<br />
	BusinessWeek says Congress and the White House are inching toward a compromise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Noonz Wire</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/25/social-security-compromise/comment-page-1/#comment-27649</link>
		<dc:creator>The Noonz Wire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 23:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2301#comment-27649</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;More &quot;Compromising&quot; on Capitol Hill?&lt;/strong&gt;

Michelle Malkin reports that another compromise may be heading our way from Capitol Hill, this time on Social Security. And as was the case with Monday&#039;s wonderful filibuster compromise, it looks like the Republicans are going to let the Democrats sc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More &#8220;Compromising&#8221; on Capitol Hill?</strong></p>
<p>Michelle Malkin reports that another compromise may be heading our way from Capitol Hill, this time on Social Security. And as was the case with Monday&#8217;s wonderful filibuster compromise, it looks like the Republicans are going to let the Democrats sc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Conservative Man</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/25/social-security-compromise/comment-page-1/#comment-27648</link>
		<dc:creator>The Conservative Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 23:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2301#comment-27648</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Different Things&lt;/strong&gt;

Check out this great cartoon from Neal Boortz regarding the &quot;Extraordinary Circumstances&quot; required for Democrats to filibuster.

Ben Shapiro&#039;s talks about Article II of the Constitution in his new column.  For any liberals reading, that is where it t...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Different Things</strong></p>
<p>Check out this great cartoon from Neal Boortz regarding the &#8220;Extraordinary Circumstances&#8221; required for Democrats to filibuster.</p>
<p>Ben Shapiro&#8217;s talks about Article II of the Constitution in his new column.  For any liberals reading, that is where it t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ncc74656's Slashdot journal</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/25/social-security-compromise/comment-page-1/#comment-27647</link>
		<dc:creator>ncc74656's Slashdot journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 21:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2301#comment-27647</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Looks like this week&#039;s filibuster &quot;compromise&quot;...&lt;/strong&gt;

...may have been the tip of the iceberg.  Thanks for nothing, guys. If I had wanted Democrats running Congress, I would&#039;ve voted for the bastards in the first place...it would&#039;ve saved time, compared to what we&#039;re getting now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Looks like this week&#8217;s filibuster &#8220;compromise&#8221;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;may have been the tip of the iceberg.  Thanks for nothing, guys. If I had wanted Democrats running Congress, I would&#8217;ve voted for the bastards in the first place&#8230;it would&#8217;ve saved time, compared to what we&#8217;re getting now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right In Texas</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/25/social-security-compromise/comment-page-1/#comment-27646</link>
		<dc:creator>Right In Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 20:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2301#comment-27646</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;5.25&lt;/strong&gt;

Michelle Malkin writes that the White House and Congress could be getting closer to an agreement on Social Security. The plan would not include private accounts and a sharp increase on those earning more than 80,000 a year; sounds like another Filibu...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>5.25</strong></p>
<p>Michelle Malkin writes that the White House and Congress could be getting closer to an agreement on Social Security. The plan would not include private accounts and a sharp increase on those earning more than 80,000 a year; sounds like another Filibu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/05/25/social-security-compromise/comment-page-1/#comment-27645</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 20:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2301#comment-27645</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Moving healthcare up on US agenda&lt;/strong&gt;

Social Security or healthcare reform? A coalition of more than 150 major corporations, unions, healt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Moving healthcare up on US agenda</strong></p>
<p>Social Security or healthcare reform? A coalition of more than 150 major corporations, unions, healt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

