Did You Know...

   

WAPO: SOCIAL SECURITY INDEXING REFORM “MERITS SERIOUS CONSIDERATION”

Share
By Michelle Malkin  •  May 31, 2005 05:08 AM

The Washington Post editorial board likes President Bush’s proposal to adjust how Social Security benefits are indexed:

IS PRESIDENT BUSH advocating cruel cuts in Social Security? Consider these calculations by the Urban Institute’s C. Eugene Steuerle: Government-provided retirement benefits for the average couple retiring in 1960 amounted to $195,000. Today, that amount has grown to $710,000 ($439,000 in Social Security and $271,000 in Medicare, which didn’t exist in 1960). For a couple retiring 25 years from now, lifetime benefits are scheduled to exceed $1 million. Mr. Steuerle’s numbers are adjusted for inflation, so this is real growth.

Is this sensible, given other pressing demands? Is it sustainable, given the impending retirement of the baby boomers? The answer to both questions is no, which is why Mr. Bush’s proposal to adjust the way that increases in Social Security benefits are calculated — a method known as progressive indexing — merits serious consideration.

Bush unveiled the propsosal more than a month ago. The WaPo’s comments are welcome, albeit belated.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Posted in: Media

MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow blows lid off ‘partisan implications’ of rain

June 21, 2017 04:46 PM by Doug Powers

The first climate change-related Dem election casualty?

Scott Pelley: Ya know, the attack on GOP congressmen was ‘to some degree self-inflicted’

June 19, 2017 04:23 PM by Doug Powers

The mask falls all the way to the ground

CNN: If only US president cared about ‘climate’ as much as North Korea’s dictator

June 7, 2017 05:01 PM by Doug Powers

He’s got some fans in the west, apparently

AP readies Earth’s obituary in case Trump pulls US out of Paris Agreement

May 27, 2017 02:37 PM by Doug Powers

“Journalism”


Categories: Media, Media Bias, Politics

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook