Did You Know...

   

WAPO: SOCIAL SECURITY INDEXING REFORM “MERITS SERIOUS CONSIDERATION”

Share
By Michelle Malkin  •  May 31, 2005 05:08 AM

The Washington Post editorial board likes President Bush’s proposal to adjust how Social Security benefits are indexed:

IS PRESIDENT BUSH advocating cruel cuts in Social Security? Consider these calculations by the Urban Institute’s C. Eugene Steuerle: Government-provided retirement benefits for the average couple retiring in 1960 amounted to $195,000. Today, that amount has grown to $710,000 ($439,000 in Social Security and $271,000 in Medicare, which didn’t exist in 1960). For a couple retiring 25 years from now, lifetime benefits are scheduled to exceed $1 million. Mr. Steuerle’s numbers are adjusted for inflation, so this is real growth.

Is this sensible, given other pressing demands? Is it sustainable, given the impending retirement of the baby boomers? The answer to both questions is no, which is why Mr. Bush’s proposal to adjust the way that increases in Social Security benefits are calculated — a method known as progressive indexing — merits serious consideration.

Bush unveiled the propsosal more than a month ago. The WaPo’s comments are welcome, albeit belated.

Posted in: Media

How can MSM prove they’re making ‘honest mistakes’ about Trump? Simple

December 10, 2017 09:13 AM by Doug Powers

Challenge

Newsweek wants you to meet the Pence family — Serial pet killers

December 8, 2017 02:38 PM by Doug Powers

The only thing this story indicates has met with an untimely death is journalism.

ABC News colludes with Hillary’s pet narrative, embarrassment ensues

December 1, 2017 07:08 PM by Doug Powers

A whopper of a “clarification”

This is NOT the best defense Al Franken could have received

November 29, 2017 05:45 PM by Doug Powers

Bad signals


Categories: Media, Media Bias, Politics