The Washington Post editorial board likes President Bush’s proposal to adjust how Social Security benefits are indexed:
IS PRESIDENT BUSH advocating cruel cuts in Social Security? Consider these calculations by the Urban Institute’s C. Eugene Steuerle: Government-provided retirement benefits for the average couple retiring in 1960 amounted to $195,000. Today, that amount has grown to $710,000 ($439,000 in Social Security and $271,000 in Medicare, which didn’t exist in 1960). For a couple retiring 25 years from now, lifetime benefits are scheduled to exceed $1 million. Mr. Steuerle’s numbers are adjusted for inflation, so this is real growth.
Is this sensible, given other pressing demands? Is it sustainable, given the impending retirement of the baby boomers? The answer to both questions is no, which is why Mr. Bush’s proposal to adjust the way that increases in Social Security benefits are calculated — a method known as progressive indexing — merits serious consideration.
Bush unveiled the propsosal more than a month ago. The WaPo’s comments are welcome, albeit belated.
July 22, 2015 10:02 PM by Doug Powers
July 9, 2015 09:15 PM by Doug Powers
July 5, 2015 10:54 AM by Doug Powers
MSM Awakenings: Hey, maybe problems like Greece have something to do with spending money they don’t have
June 30, 2015 09:01 AM by Doug Powers
How much of Hillary’s gay pride swag will the Clinton Foundation’s Middle Eastern donors buy? (A Sunday open thread)
June 28, 2015 10:34 AM by Doug Powers