Did You Know...

   

WAPO: SOCIAL SECURITY INDEXING REFORM “MERITS SERIOUS CONSIDERATION”

Share
By Michelle Malkin  •  May 31, 2005 05:08 AM

The Washington Post editorial board likes President Bush’s proposal to adjust how Social Security benefits are indexed:

IS PRESIDENT BUSH advocating cruel cuts in Social Security? Consider these calculations by the Urban Institute’s C. Eugene Steuerle: Government-provided retirement benefits for the average couple retiring in 1960 amounted to $195,000. Today, that amount has grown to $710,000 ($439,000 in Social Security and $271,000 in Medicare, which didn’t exist in 1960). For a couple retiring 25 years from now, lifetime benefits are scheduled to exceed $1 million. Mr. Steuerle’s numbers are adjusted for inflation, so this is real growth.

Is this sensible, given other pressing demands? Is it sustainable, given the impending retirement of the baby boomers? The answer to both questions is no, which is why Mr. Bush’s proposal to adjust the way that increases in Social Security benefits are calculated — a method known as progressive indexing — merits serious consideration.

Bush unveiled the propsosal more than a month ago. The WaPo’s comments are welcome, albeit belated.

Posted in: Media

NY Times: Economy’s getting better, and here’s how that might kill you

October 18, 2017 07:16 AM by Doug Powers

Even good news is bad news in the Trump era

Here’s a Weinstein talking point just waiting to be picked up by the left

October 13, 2017 02:40 PM by Doug Powers

Binders full of BS

WaPo fact check rates Tim Kaine’s ‘silencer’ lie less untrue because of his ignorance

October 4, 2017 08:10 PM by Doug Powers

Talk about benefit of the doubt

WARNING: This football team’s ‘unifying moment’ could trigger SJW hyperventilation

October 1, 2017 07:34 PM by Doug Powers

No knees taken here

2017: Dem senator on break from corruption trial calls Trump’s leadership ‘shameful’

October 1, 2017 03:07 PM by Doug Powers

Also vouches for character of San Juan mayor


Categories: Donald Trump, Media Bias, New York Times