Did You Know...



By Michelle Malkin  •  May 31, 2005 05:08 AM

The Washington Post editorial board likes President Bush’s proposal to adjust how Social Security benefits are indexed:

IS PRESIDENT BUSH advocating cruel cuts in Social Security? Consider these calculations by the Urban Institute’s C. Eugene Steuerle: Government-provided retirement benefits for the average couple retiring in 1960 amounted to $195,000. Today, that amount has grown to $710,000 ($439,000 in Social Security and $271,000 in Medicare, which didn’t exist in 1960). For a couple retiring 25 years from now, lifetime benefits are scheduled to exceed $1 million. Mr. Steuerle’s numbers are adjusted for inflation, so this is real growth.

Is this sensible, given other pressing demands? Is it sustainable, given the impending retirement of the baby boomers? The answer to both questions is no, which is why Mr. Bush’s proposal to adjust the way that increases in Social Security benefits are calculated — a method known as progressive indexing — merits serious consideration.

Bush unveiled the propsosal more than a month ago. The WaPo’s comments are welcome, albeit belated.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Posted in: Media

Debate Depressive Disorder

October 19, 2016 09:01 AM by Michelle Malkin

Perfect: President ‘if you like your plan you can keep it’ says something needs to be done about all the lies out there

October 15, 2016 02:25 PM by Doug Powers


What better “curator of truth” could there be?

Secret code name of Clinton cover-up operation revealed: ‘Clinton cover-up operation’

September 27, 2016 11:38 AM by Doug Powers


It depends on what your definition of “joke” is.

Categories: 2016 Campaign, Corruption, Democrats, Hillary Clinton, Media

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook