Did You Know...

   

WAPO: SOCIAL SECURITY INDEXING REFORM “MERITS SERIOUS CONSIDERATION”

Share
By Michelle Malkin  •  May 31, 2005 05:08 AM

The Washington Post editorial board likes President Bush’s proposal to adjust how Social Security benefits are indexed:

IS PRESIDENT BUSH advocating cruel cuts in Social Security? Consider these calculations by the Urban Institute’s C. Eugene Steuerle: Government-provided retirement benefits for the average couple retiring in 1960 amounted to $195,000. Today, that amount has grown to $710,000 ($439,000 in Social Security and $271,000 in Medicare, which didn’t exist in 1960). For a couple retiring 25 years from now, lifetime benefits are scheduled to exceed $1 million. Mr. Steuerle’s numbers are adjusted for inflation, so this is real growth.

Is this sensible, given other pressing demands? Is it sustainable, given the impending retirement of the baby boomers? The answer to both questions is no, which is why Mr. Bush’s proposal to adjust the way that increases in Social Security benefits are calculated — a method known as progressive indexing — merits serious consideration.

Bush unveiled the propsosal more than a month ago. The WaPo’s comments are welcome, albeit belated.

blog comments powered by Disqus
~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's Email List:
Posted in: Media

MSNBC host asks important question: Is world suffering from lack of racial diversity in emoticons?

July 30, 2014 09:55 AM by Doug Powers

farrow1

There aren’t enough emoticons for “moronic” either

How Jimmy Kimmel could still land that Obama interview

July 22, 2014 11:25 AM by Doug Powers

fundraising

The Eagle lands, 45 years ago today

July 20, 2014 10:02 AM by Doug Powers

moonland

Still awesome

You’ll never guess what might have contributed to the current Iraq crisis

June 28, 2014 07:39 AM by Doug Powers

iraqbear

Predictable


Categories: Enviro-nitwits, Media

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook