GITMO: THE PUBLIC APPROVES

By Michelle Malkin  •  June 21, 2005 03:42 PM

Via Gerry Daly and Ankle Biting Pundits, here are the latest poll numbers on how Americans view the Bush administration’s operation of Guantanamo Bay:

- As you may know, since 2001, the United States has held people from other countries who are suspected of being terrorists at a detention facility in Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. Based on what you have heard or read, do you think the US should continue to operate this facility or do you think the US should close this facility and transfer the prisoners to other facilities?

Continue to operate: 58
Close facility: 36
No opinion: 6

- In general, do you approve or disapprove of the way the US is treating the prisoners being held at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba?

Approve: 52
Disapprove: 37
No opinion: 11

- Do you approve/disapprove strongly, or not strongly?

Approve, strongly: 33
Approve, not strongly: 19
Disapprove, not strongly: 14
Disapprove, strongly: 23
No opinion: 11

Keep doing what you’re doing, Gitmo-bashers. It’s working wonders.

***

Reader feedback…

Robert C. writes: “The missing question is the one in which they determine if disapproval comes from feeling the treatment is too kind.”

Yes.

***

Update: The White House has rejected the idea of a commission to investigate alleged detainee abuse.

The White House on Tuesday rejected the proposed creation of an independent commission to investigate abuses of detainees held at the U.S. military prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and elsewhere.

White House spokesman Scott McClellan said the Pentagon has launched 10 major investigations into allegations of abuse, and that system was working well. “People are being held to account,” he said. “And we think that’s the way to go about this.”

Agreed.

***

Related:

The politics of the Gitmo debate

Posted in: Gitmo

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. The Jawa Report
  2. hubs and spokes
  3. The Conservative Man
  4. NixGuy.com
  5. Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator
  6. Toadpond
  7. Interested-Participant
  8. The Jawa Report
  9. The Anchoress
  10. The Buzz Blog
  11. UNCoRRELATED
  12. Ace of Spades HQ
  13. Danny Carlton (aka Jack Lewis)

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Corruptocrat AG Eric Holder’s conflicted DOJ

November 20, 2009 05:29 PM by Michelle Malkin

18 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

The real Gitmo

November 17, 2009 10:36 AM by Michelle Malkin

78 Comments | 1 Trackback

Where’s the transparency on Gitmo?

October 22, 2009 10:16 AM by Michelle Malkin

19 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Amherst MA: Please give us Gitmo detainees!

October 21, 2009 10:44 AM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

One step closer to bringing Gitmo circus to U.S. soil

October 20, 2009 10:26 PM by Michelle Malkin

29 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

ACLU defends its CIA paparazzi project

September 18, 2009 09:11 AM by Michelle Malkin

56 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

ACLU’s spying project: Operation CIA Paparazzi

August 26, 2009 09:27 AM by Michelle Malkin

35 Comments | 7 Trackbacks


Categories: Gitmo



Mudville Gazette

» Bad Weather (Part I)

Pundit & Pundette

» About last night's vote

JustOneMinute

» "Unequivocal"?
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook