<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCOTUS WATCH: 10 COMMANDMENTS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/scotus-watch-10-commandments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/scotus-watch-10-commandments/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:24:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alpraizolum</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/scotus-watch-10-commandments/comment-page-1/#comment-30511</link>
		<dc:creator>alpraizolum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2557#comment-30511</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alpraizolum&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alpraizolum</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atlas Blogged</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/scotus-watch-10-commandments/comment-page-1/#comment-30510</link>
		<dc:creator>Atlas Blogged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 05:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2557#comment-30510</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Constitution of the Iraqi Conglomerate&lt;/strong&gt;

the constitutional draft gives roughly equal weight to the “principles of democracy” and to human rights, and contains a broad list of political freedoms...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Constitution of the Iraqi Conglomerate</strong></p>
<p>the constitutional draft gives roughly equal weight to the “principles of democracy” and to human rights, and contains a broad list of political freedoms&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Conservative Man</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/scotus-watch-10-commandments/comment-page-1/#comment-30509</link>
		<dc:creator>The Conservative Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2557#comment-30509</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Supreme Court Cases&lt;/strong&gt;

Here are some links related to the decisions handed down by the high court that I didn&#039;t have time to get to yesterday.

From Michelle Malkin:
SCOTUS WATCH: 10 COMMANDMENTS
SCOTUS WATCH: CABLE COMPANIES DON&#039;T HAVE TO SHARE THEIR LINES
SCOTUS WATCH...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Supreme Court Cases</strong></p>
<p>Here are some links related to the decisions handed down by the high court that I didn&#8217;t have time to get to yesterday.</p>
<p>From Michelle Malkin:<br />
SCOTUS WATCH: 10 COMMANDMENTS<br />
SCOTUS WATCH: CABLE COMPANIES DON&#8217;T HAVE TO SHARE THEIR LINES<br />
SCOTUS WATCH&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Carlton (aka Jack Lewis)</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/scotus-watch-10-commandments/comment-page-1/#comment-30508</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Carlton (aka Jack Lewis)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2557#comment-30508</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Responses to the Supreme Court&#039;s Schizophrenic decisions&lt;/strong&gt;

&#160; Stephen M. Crampton, Chief Counsel American Family Association&#039;s Center for Law and Policy “The Court’s second-guessing of the hidden...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Responses to the Supreme Court&#8217;s Schizophrenic decisions</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp; Stephen M. Crampton, Chief Counsel American Family Association&#8217;s Center for Law and Policy “The Court’s second-guessing of the hidden&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pajama Hadin</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/scotus-watch-10-commandments/comment-page-1/#comment-30507</link>
		<dc:creator>Pajama Hadin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2557#comment-30507</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Justice Scalia, 10 Commandments and Dictators in the Court</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.<br />
- John Adams</p>
<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) &#8211; A divided U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Monday that putting framed copies of the Ten Co&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Great Separation</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/scotus-watch-10-commandments/comment-page-1/#comment-30506</link>
		<dc:creator>The Great Separation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 05:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2557#comment-30506</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Double Mindedness of SCOTUS.&lt;/strong&gt;

Humble yourselves - I would so like to say that I was surprised by the decision on the 10 Commandments issue given today by the Supreme Court of the United States. But I&#039;m not. This institution is so schizophrenic that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Double Mindedness of SCOTUS.</strong></p>
<p>Humble yourselves &#8211; I would so like to say that I was surprised by the decision on the 10 Commandments issue given today by the Supreme Court of the United States. But I&#8217;m not. This institution is so schizophrenic that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Larsonian</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/scotus-watch-10-commandments/comment-page-1/#comment-30505</link>
		<dc:creator>The Larsonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 04:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2557#comment-30505</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A Question on the Occasion of SCOTUS&#039;s Ten Comm...&lt;/strong&gt;

So here&#039;s the question that I take from their two decisions today:

How many non-Judeo-Christian elements must be part of a public building&#039;s installation to sufficiently dilute the impact of the Ten Commandments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Question on the Occasion of SCOTUS&#8217;s Ten Comm&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>So here&#8217;s the question that I take from their two decisions today:</p>
<p>How many non-Judeo-Christian elements must be part of a public building&#8217;s installation to sufficiently dilute the impact of the Ten Commandments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cafe Oregano</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/scotus-watch-10-commandments/comment-page-1/#comment-30504</link>
		<dc:creator>Cafe Oregano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 03:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2557#comment-30504</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;scotus on the ten&lt;/strong&gt;

Still absorbing today&#039;s rulings from the Supreme Court on The Ten Commandments, I have been browsing the blogosphere for commentary. Michelle Malkin has a pretty good Carnival of the SCOTUS in the development. I do not understand the seeming contradict...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>scotus on the ten</strong></p>
<p>Still absorbing today&#8217;s rulings from the Supreme Court on The Ten Commandments, I have been browsing the blogosphere for commentary. Michelle Malkin has a pretty good Carnival of the SCOTUS in the development. I do not understand the seeming contradict&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smokin' News</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/scotus-watch-10-commandments/comment-page-1/#comment-30503</link>
		<dc:creator>Smokin' News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 03:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2557#comment-30503</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Free speech - to everyone who agrees with us!&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;

The point was to distance the practice of religion as far from the exercise of government as possible, thereby ensuring that both were free to operate in their respective fields. Government would look after the safety, well-being, and liberty of its ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;Free speech &#8211; to everyone who agrees with us!&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>The point was to distance the practice of religion as far from the exercise of government as possible, thereby ensuring that both were free to operate in their respective fields. Government would look after the safety, well-being, and liberty of its &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ConservativeOutpost</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/scotus-watch-10-commandments/comment-page-1/#comment-30502</link>
		<dc:creator>ConservativeOutpost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2557#comment-30502</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;More SCOTUS&lt;/strong&gt;

No retirement...yet. I find it interesting though that Bush has scheduled TV time for a prime time address re: Iraq for tomorrow night...the day after the end of the court term. Makes me wonder if he&#039;s &quot;expecting&quot; that retirement by...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More SCOTUS</strong></p>
<p>No retirement&#8230;yet. I find it interesting though that Bush has scheduled TV time for a prime time address re: Iraq for tomorrow night&#8230;the day after the end of the court term. Makes me wonder if he&#8217;s &#8220;expecting&#8221; that retirement by&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lump on a Blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/scotus-watch-10-commandments/comment-page-1/#comment-30501</link>
		<dc:creator>Lump on a Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2557#comment-30501</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Liberalism and Diversity&lt;/strong&gt;

The recent SCOTUS decision that knocks down Ten Commandment displays in two Kentucky Courthouses demonstrates one of the most dangerous pathologies of the liberal disease that is slowly eroding this country. 
	In liberalism’s strive to elevate diver...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Liberalism and Diversity</strong></p>
<p>The recent SCOTUS decision that knocks down Ten Commandment displays in two Kentucky Courthouses demonstrates one of the most dangerous pathologies of the liberal disease that is slowly eroding this country.<br />
	In liberalism’s strive to elevate diver&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Love America First</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/scotus-watch-10-commandments/comment-page-1/#comment-30500</link>
		<dc:creator>Love America First</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2557#comment-30500</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Supremes Rule&lt;/strong&gt;

Michelle Malkin and DOUBLE TOOTHPICKS have a running watch on the decisions of the Supreme Court. You may want to head over there! It could affect YOU. If it does not, it will eventually it will. If you do not stand up for what is right and just today,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Supremes Rule</strong></p>
<p>Michelle Malkin and DOUBLE TOOTHPICKS have a running watch on the decisions of the Supreme Court. You may want to head over there! It could affect YOU. If it does not, it will eventually it will. If you do not stand up for what is right and just today,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The LLama Butchers</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/scotus-watch-10-commandments/comment-page-1/#comment-30499</link>
		<dc:creator>The LLama Butchers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2557#comment-30499</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SCOTUS Blogging&lt;/strong&gt;

If I understand the Supremes&#039; rulings concerning the placement of the Ten Commandments in a courthouse, it&#039;s okay to do so if a framed copy of the lyrics to Everybody Wang Chung Tonight is placed next to them. I think...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SCOTUS Blogging</strong></p>
<p>If I understand the Supremes&#8217; rulings concerning the placement of the Ten Commandments in a courthouse, it&#8217;s okay to do so if a framed copy of the lyrics to Everybody Wang Chung Tonight is placed next to them. I think&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Secure Liberty</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/scotus-watch-10-commandments/comment-page-1/#comment-30498</link>
		<dc:creator>Secure Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2557#comment-30498</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Supreme Court Ten Commandments&lt;/strong&gt;

A flurry of activity from the high court today.  I have only seen the excerpts of the opinions at this point, haven&#039;t had time to read them.  At first glance, they got most of these cases right, and I hope the holding in the Ten Commandments case is as...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Supreme Court Ten Commandments</strong></p>
<p>A flurry of activity from the high court today.  I have only seen the excerpts of the opinions at this point, haven&#8217;t had time to read them.  At first glance, they got most of these cases right, and I hope the holding in the Ten Commandments case is as&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Unalienable Right</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/scotus-watch-10-commandments/comment-page-1/#comment-30497</link>
		<dc:creator>The Unalienable Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 21:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2557#comment-30497</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;God Bless This Honorable Court&lt;/strong&gt;

There&#039;s really not much to say about the confused, difference-splitting Ten Commandments decisions handed down today by the U.S. Supreme Court.  Unfortunately, the decisions are not surprising, given the state of the courts today. There are two opposin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>God Bless This Honorable Court</strong></p>
<p>There&#8217;s really not much to say about the confused, difference-splitting Ten Commandments decisions handed down today by the U.S. Supreme Court.  Unfortunately, the decisions are not surprising, given the state of the courts today. There are two opposin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
