<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE SUPREME COURT SIZZLES</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/the-supreme-court-sizzles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/the-supreme-court-sizzles/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:12:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Narrow</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/the-supreme-court-sizzles/comment-page-1/#comment-30436</link>
		<dc:creator>The Narrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2551#comment-30436</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Will He Or Won&#039;t He?&lt;/strong&gt;

Will President Bush nominate Alberto Gonzales to fill a likely vacancy on the Supreme Court? Many are talking, but no one knows for sure. I would not like to see him nominated based on his weak stance on abortion. The...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Will He Or Won&#8217;t He?</strong></p>
<p>Will President Bush nominate Alberto Gonzales to fill a likely vacancy on the Supreme Court? Many are talking, but no one knows for sure. I would not like to see him nominated based on his weak stance on abortion. The&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Conservative Man</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/the-supreme-court-sizzles/comment-page-1/#comment-30435</link>
		<dc:creator>The Conservative Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2551#comment-30435</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Supreme Court Cases&lt;/strong&gt;

Here are some links related to the decisions handed down by the high court that I didn&#039;t have time to get to yesterday.

From Michelle Malkin:
SCOTUS WATCH: 10 COMMANDMENTS
SCOTUS WATCH: CABLE COMPANIES DON&#039;T HAVE TO SHARE THEIR LINES
SCOTUS WATCH...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Supreme Court Cases</strong></p>
<p>Here are some links related to the decisions handed down by the high court that I didn&#8217;t have time to get to yesterday.</p>
<p>From Michelle Malkin:<br />
SCOTUS WATCH: 10 COMMANDMENTS<br />
SCOTUS WATCH: CABLE COMPANIES DON&#8217;T HAVE TO SHARE THEIR LINES<br />
SCOTUS WATCH&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Love America First</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/the-supreme-court-sizzles/comment-page-1/#comment-30434</link>
		<dc:creator>Love America First</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2551#comment-30434</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Supremes Rule&lt;/strong&gt;

Michelle Malkin and DOUBLE TOOTHPICKS have a running watch on the decisions of the Supreme Court. You may want to head over there! It could affect YOU. If it does not, it will eventually it will. If you do not stand up for what is right and just today,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Supremes Rule</strong></p>
<p>Michelle Malkin and DOUBLE TOOTHPICKS have a running watch on the decisions of the Supreme Court. You may want to head over there! It could affect YOU. If it does not, it will eventually it will. If you do not stand up for what is right and just today,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/the-supreme-court-sizzles/comment-page-1/#comment-30433</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 21:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2551#comment-30433</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Court Splits on Ten Commandments Displays&lt;/strong&gt;

High Court Bars Display of Ten Commandments at Ky. Courthouses, but OKs Them at Texas Capitol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Court Splits on Ten Commandments Displays</strong></p>
<p>High Court Bars Display of Ten Commandments at Ky. Courthouses, but OKs Them at Texas Capitol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizen Journal Blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/the-supreme-court-sizzles/comment-page-1/#comment-30432</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizen Journal Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2551#comment-30432</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SCOTUS sizzles&lt;/strong&gt;

If you&#039;re a SCOTUS junkie, today is your day. Michelle Malkin has the links and has already posted her take on the file-sharing decision; Powerline discusses potential nominees (so does Volokh). More later......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SCOTUS sizzles</strong></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a SCOTUS junkie, today is your day. Michelle Malkin has the links and has already posted her take on the file-sharing decision; Powerline discusses potential nominees (so does Volokh). More later&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Narrow</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/the-supreme-court-sizzles/comment-page-1/#comment-30431</link>
		<dc:creator>The Narrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2551#comment-30431</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Supreme Court Bans Ten Commandments&lt;/strong&gt;

The Supreme Court has been on a roll lately, and thus the secularization of America continues. Earlier today, they ruled that the Ten Commandments may not be displayed in government buildings or property. The Supreme Court on Monday declared Ten...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Supreme Court Bans Ten Commandments</strong></p>
<p>The Supreme Court has been on a roll lately, and thus the secularization of America continues. Earlier today, they ruled that the Ten Commandments may not be displayed in government buildings or property. The Supreme Court on Monday declared Ten&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Face Made 4 Radio, A Voice Made 4 the Internet</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/the-supreme-court-sizzles/comment-page-1/#comment-30430</link>
		<dc:creator>A Face Made 4 Radio, A Voice Made 4 the Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2551#comment-30430</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Supreme Court Rules the Ten Commandments...&lt;/strong&gt;

Even though The Ten Commandments (and Moses) are etched into stone in their building, the US Supreme Court has ruled...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Supreme Court Rules the Ten Commandments&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Even though The Ten Commandments (and Moses) are etched into stone in their building, the US Supreme Court has ruled&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Rovian Conspiracy - St Wendeler</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/the-supreme-court-sizzles/comment-page-1/#comment-30429</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Rovian Conspiracy - St Wendeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2551#comment-30429</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SCOTUS Boots 10 Commandments&lt;/strong&gt;

So, now that they&#039;ve booted the 10 Commandments from the courthouse, will they start sandblasting it from all of the federal buildings (including the Supreme Court building)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SCOTUS Boots 10 Commandments</strong></p>
<p>So, now that they&#8217;ve booted the 10 Commandments from the courthouse, will they start sandblasting it from all of the federal buildings (including the Supreme Court building)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dummocrats.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/the-supreme-court-sizzles/comment-page-1/#comment-30428</link>
		<dc:creator>Dummocrats.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2551#comment-30428</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Malkin previews a big day for SCOTUS&lt;/strong&gt;

Malkin previews a big day for SCOTUS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Malkin previews a big day for SCOTUS</strong></p>
<p>Malkin previews a big day for SCOTUS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Florida Masochist</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/the-supreme-court-sizzles/comment-page-1/#comment-30427</link>
		<dc:creator>The Florida Masochist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2551#comment-30427</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Will there be a vacancy to be filled at the USSC?&lt;/strong&gt;

If I were placing bets, I&#039;d say Michael McConnell to replace Rehnquist as CJ and Either Edith Brown Clement or Alberto Gonzales to replace O&#039;Connor. Clement&#039;s name came up for the seat Souter got in 1990 and Gonzales is of course Attorney General at th...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Will there be a vacancy to be filled at the USSC?</strong></p>
<p>If I were placing bets, I&#8217;d say Michael McConnell to replace Rehnquist as CJ and Either Edith Brown Clement or Alberto Gonzales to replace O&#8217;Connor. Clement&#8217;s name came up for the seat Souter got in 1990 and Gonzales is of course Attorney General at th&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ConservativeOutpost</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/the-supreme-court-sizzles/comment-page-1/#comment-30426</link>
		<dc:creator>ConservativeOutpost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2551#comment-30426</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Supreme Court Monday&lt;/strong&gt;

Today will be a big day, one way or another. At a minimum we&#039;ve got a big decison re: the Ten commandments comming down...and quite possibly the announcement of one or more retirements from the bench. Gentlemen, start your engines!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Supreme Court Monday</strong></p>
<p>Today will be a big day, one way or another. At a minimum we&#8217;ve got a big decison re: the Ten commandments comming down&#8230;and quite possibly the announcement of one or more retirements from the bench. Gentlemen, start your engines!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right In Texas</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/the-supreme-court-sizzles/comment-page-1/#comment-30425</link>
		<dc:creator>Right In Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2551#comment-30425</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Big Decisions&lt;/strong&gt;

On the last day of the term for the Supreme Court we expect a ruling on the constitutionality of government Ten Commandments displays along with a few other high interest......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Big Decisions</strong></p>
<p>On the last day of the term for the Supreme Court we expect a ruling on the constitutionality of government Ten Commandments displays along with a few other high interest&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Shawn Barber's Corner</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/the-supreme-court-sizzles/comment-page-1/#comment-30424</link>
		<dc:creator>La Shawn Barber's Corner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2551#comment-30424</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Kelo: Nothing New&lt;/strong&gt;

The blogosphere is buzzing about Kelo v. New London. Last week the Supreme Court turned the &quot;public use&quot; clause of the Fifth Amendment on its head. Local governments now have the power to snatch private property for &quot;economic development&quot; whether such ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kelo: Nothing New</strong></p>
<p>The blogosphere is buzzing about Kelo v. New London. Last week the Supreme Court turned the &#8220;public use&#8221; clause of the Fifth Amendment on its head. Local governments now have the power to snatch private property for &#8220;economic development&#8221; whether such &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Colossus</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/the-supreme-court-sizzles/comment-page-1/#comment-30423</link>
		<dc:creator>The Colossus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2551#comment-30423</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Michelle Malkin Has a Supreme Court Roundup&lt;/strong&gt;

Including possible successors to Chief Justice Rehnquist or Sandra Day O&#039;Connor if they decide to retire. I&#039;m thinking that both of them will -- Rehnquist due to poor health and O&#039;Connor because she&#039;s been saying she will for years. Anyone care to wage...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Michelle Malkin Has a Supreme Court Roundup</strong></p>
<p>Including possible successors to Chief Justice Rehnquist or Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor if they decide to retire. I&#8217;m thinking that both of them will &#8212; Rehnquist due to poor health and O&#8217;Connor because she&#8217;s been saying she will for years. Anyone care to wage&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/06/27/the-supreme-court-sizzles/comment-page-1/#comment-30422</link>
		<dc:creator>FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2551#comment-30422</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Supreme Court of the United States: Last Day of Term&lt;/strong&gt;

The United States Supreme Court ends its term today with decisions on major cases and anticipated retirements of one or more justices.
	Michell Malkin has an excellent round-up here, THE SUPREME COURT SIZZLES
	Hot day ahead for the Supreme Court as ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Supreme Court of the United States: Last Day of Term</strong></p>
<p>The United States Supreme Court ends its term today with decisions on major cases and anticipated retirements of one or more justices.<br />
	Michell Malkin has an excellent round-up here, THE SUPREME COURT SIZZLES<br />
	Hot day ahead for the Supreme Court as &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
