Michelle Malkin » IS THE NEW YORK TIMES SERIOUS…

IS THE NEW YORK TIMES SERIOUS…

By Michelle Malkin • June 28, 2005 11:42 AM

…about restoring its credibility as a reliable source of news?

Righty blogger/veteran journalist Mark Tapscott takes a closer look at the paper’s “Credibility Committee” report (sorry, the name is so snort-worthy) and at exec editor Bill Keller’s response, and actually has some good things to say about the ailing Gray Lady.

If the paper’s editors really wanted to boost credibility and trustworthiness, they could start by hiring Mark!

Posted in: New York Times

Printer Friendly

comments (0)

trackbacks (1)

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

ayclowir

Trackback URL

You must be logged in to post a comment.

“Insufficient tuned-in-ness.”

What’s missing from the New York Times coverage of ACORN

September 16, 2009 12:09 AM by Michelle Malkin

89 Comments | 20 Trackbacks

Who said it: “The real story to all this is how these myriad entities allow them to shuffle money around so much that no one really knows what’s getting spent on what.”