<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NANCY PELOSI SAID WHAT?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/01/nancy-pelosi-said-what/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/01/nancy-pelosi-said-what/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:38:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: accept credit cards</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/01/nancy-pelosi-said-what/comment-page-1/#comment-30878</link>
		<dc:creator>accept credit cards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 12:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2591#comment-30878</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;accept credit cards&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/nashebablo/free_credit_reports.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;free credit reports&lt;/a&gt; &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://user.aol.com/nashebablo/credit_card_processing.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;credit card processing&lt;/a&gt; &#124; 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>accept credit cards</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://user.aol.com/nashebablo/free_credit_reports.html" rel="nofollow">free credit reports</a> | <a href="http://user.aol.com/nashebablo/credit_card_processing.html" rel="nofollow">credit card processing</a> |</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: desktop strippers</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/01/nancy-pelosi-said-what/comment-page-1/#comment-30877</link>
		<dc:creator>desktop strippers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2591#comment-30877</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;desktop strippers&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://wapurl.co.uk/?O2IM7WI&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;desktop strippers&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>desktop strippers</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://wapurl.co.uk/?O2IM7WI" rel="nofollow">desktop strippers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laminate countertops discount online</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/01/nancy-pelosi-said-what/comment-page-1/#comment-30876</link>
		<dc:creator>laminate countertops discount online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2591#comment-30876</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;laminate countertops discount online&lt;/strong&gt;

. Marcus  Fredriksson
Laminate countertops d...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>laminate countertops discount online</strong></p>
<p>. Marcus  Fredriksson<br />
Laminate countertops d&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wing Nut Echo Chamber</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/01/nancy-pelosi-said-what/comment-page-1/#comment-30875</link>
		<dc:creator>Wing Nut Echo Chamber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2591#comment-30875</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Through Nancy&#039;s Eyes&lt;/strong&gt;

&quot;... almost as if God had spoken&quot; What the SCOTUS must look like to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D - Outer Moons of Zargoff IX): h/t to Malkin and her posse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Through Nancy&#8217;s Eyes</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; almost as if God had spoken&#8221; What the SCOTUS must look like to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D &#8211; Outer Moons of Zargoff IX): h/t to Malkin and her posse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starboard!!!</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/01/nancy-pelosi-said-what/comment-page-1/#comment-30874</link>
		<dc:creator>Starboard!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 01:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2591#comment-30874</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What did Nancy Say?&lt;/strong&gt;

Question: Could you talk about this decision? What you think of it?

    Ms. Pelosi: It is a decision of the Supreme Court. If Congress wants to change it, it will require legislation of a level of a constitutional amendment. So this is almost as i...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What did Nancy Say?</strong></p>
<p>Question: Could you talk about this decision? What you think of it?</p>
<p>    Ms. Pelosi: It is a decision of the Supreme Court. If Congress wants to change it, it will require legislation of a level of a constitutional amendment. So this is almost as i&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starboard!!!</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/01/nancy-pelosi-said-what/comment-page-1/#comment-30873</link>
		<dc:creator>Starboard!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 01:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2591#comment-30873</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What did Nancy Say?&lt;/strong&gt;

Question: Could you talk about this decision? What you think of it?

    Ms. Pelosi: It is a decision of the Supreme Court. If Congress wants to change it, it will require legislation of a level of a constitutional amendment. So this is almost as i...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What did Nancy Say?</strong></p>
<p>Question: Could you talk about this decision? What you think of it?</p>
<p>    Ms. Pelosi: It is a decision of the Supreme Court. If Congress wants to change it, it will require legislation of a level of a constitutional amendment. So this is almost as i&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shayneblog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/01/nancy-pelosi-said-what/comment-page-1/#comment-30872</link>
		<dc:creator>shayneblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2005 00:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2591#comment-30872</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Today&#039;s Three Stooges&lt;/strong&gt;

Once Again, Nancy Pelosi, Brian Williams and Molly Ivins prove just what useless idiots they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Today&#8217;s Three Stooges</strong></p>
<p>Once Again, Nancy Pelosi, Brian Williams and Molly Ivins prove just what useless idiots they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wing Nut Echo Chamber</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/01/nancy-pelosi-said-what/comment-page-1/#comment-30871</link>
		<dc:creator>Wing Nut Echo Chamber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 23:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2591#comment-30871</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Through Nancy&#039;s Eyes&lt;/strong&gt;

&quot;... almost as if God had spoken&quot; What the SCOTUS must look like to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D - Outer Moons of Zargoff IX): h/t to Malkin and her posse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Through Nancy&#8217;s Eyes</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; almost as if God had spoken&#8221; What the SCOTUS must look like to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D &#8211; Outer Moons of Zargoff IX): h/t to Malkin and her posse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Townhall.com C-Log</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/01/nancy-pelosi-said-what/comment-page-1/#comment-30870</link>
		<dc:creator>Townhall.com C-Log</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 22:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2591#comment-30870</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;While I Wasn&#039;t Looking&lt;/strong&gt;

Folks are so mad on the right that Kelo will likely become a huge framing issue for the upcoming Supreme Court fight. It&#039;s a perfect example of why getting people who can read the Constitution on the Court is so important. Perhaps the fact that Pelosi ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>While I Wasn&#8217;t Looking</strong></p>
<p>Folks are so mad on the right that Kelo will likely become a huge framing issue for the upcoming Supreme Court fight. It&#8217;s a perfect example of why getting people who can read the Constitution on the Court is so important. Perhaps the fact that Pelosi &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Cranky Calvinist</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/01/nancy-pelosi-said-what/comment-page-1/#comment-30869</link>
		<dc:creator>The Cranky Calvinist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 21:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2591#comment-30869</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Madame Leader&lt;/strong&gt;

Just the honorific Madame Leader makes me cringe in queasy cramps of pain. The title is reserved for one of THE...MOST...IDIOTIC members of the House of Representatives (drum roll, please) - Nancy Pelosi. If Barbara Boxer is the stupidest Senator fro...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Madame Leader</strong></p>
<p>Just the honorific Madame Leader makes me cringe in queasy cramps of pain. The title is reserved for one of THE&#8230;MOST&#8230;IDIOTIC members of the House of Representatives (drum roll, please) &#8211; Nancy Pelosi. If Barbara Boxer is the stupidest Senator fro&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Unalienable Right</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/01/nancy-pelosi-said-what/comment-page-1/#comment-30868</link>
		<dc:creator>The Unalienable Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2591#comment-30868</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Nancy Pelosi: Supreme Court decision &quot;Almost as if God has spoken&quot;?!&lt;/strong&gt;

Based on the liberal doctrine of &quot;separation of church and state&quot;, would Pelosi say that Supreme Court decisions are a violation of the 1st amendment? Or is she just an ignorant buffoon?  We report, you decide.
 
Via The Corner:
&quot;Q Later this mornin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nancy Pelosi: Supreme Court decision &#8220;Almost as if God has spoken&#8221;?!</strong></p>
<p>Based on the liberal doctrine of &#8220;separation of church and state&#8221;, would Pelosi say that Supreme Court decisions are a violation of the 1st amendment? Or is she just an ignorant buffoon?  We report, you decide.</p>
<p>Via The Corner:<br />
&#8220;Q Later this mornin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UrbanGrounds</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/01/nancy-pelosi-said-what/comment-page-1/#comment-30867</link>
		<dc:creator>UrbanGrounds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 17:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2591#comment-30867</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nancy Pelosi is so Stupid&#8230;.&#8221;How stupid is she?&#8221;&#8230;She&#8217;s so stupid:</strong></p>
<p>She’s so stupid…she thought that opposition to the Kelo v. New London decision meant withholding funds from the Court or from enforcement of the Court’s decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Conservative</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/01/nancy-pelosi-said-what/comment-page-1/#comment-30866</link>
		<dc:creator>California Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 17:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2591#comment-30866</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Nancy Pelosi: God Has Finally Spoken&lt;/strong&gt;

But she couldn&#039;t understand him.

Making California proud, the liberal &quot;leader&quot; shows off her grasp of the ground-breaking (no pun intended) Kelo decision. &quot;It is a decision of the Supreme Court. If Congress wants to change it, it will require legisl...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nancy Pelosi: God Has Finally Spoken</strong></p>
<p>But she couldn&#8217;t understand him.</p>
<p>Making California proud, the liberal &#8220;leader&#8221; shows off her grasp of the ground-breaking (no pun intended) Kelo decision. &#8220;It is a decision of the Supreme Court. If Congress wants to change it, it will require legisl&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Chief Brief</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/01/nancy-pelosi-said-what/comment-page-1/#comment-30865</link>
		<dc:creator>The Chief Brief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 17:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2591#comment-30865</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Nancy Pelosi Loses Her Grip On Reality: Part II&lt;/strong&gt;

Hey, I have an idea for a constitutional amendment. Oh sure, it has been tried before, but maybe if we put it in really BIG BOLD LETTERS they will pay attention to it this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nancy Pelosi Loses Her Grip On Reality: Part II</strong></p>
<p>Hey, I have an idea for a constitutional amendment. Oh sure, it has been tried before, but maybe if we put it in really BIG BOLD LETTERS they will pay attention to it this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LyfLines</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/01/nancy-pelosi-said-what/comment-page-1/#comment-30864</link>
		<dc:creator>LyfLines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 17:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2591#comment-30864</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ignorance and Power - not a good combination&lt;/strong&gt;

the Constitution gives to the 3 branches of the federal government powers that are separate and equal, to create a system of checks and balances.  The Constitution does not envision that the Supreme Court carries the imprimatur of the Supreme being -...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ignorance and Power &#8211; not a good combination</strong></p>
<p>the Constitution gives to the 3 branches of the federal government powers that are separate and equal, to create a system of checks and balances.  The Constitution does not envision that the Supreme Court carries the imprimatur of the Supreme being -&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
