<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WILL O&#8217;CONNOR&#8217;S REPLACEMENT OVERTURN ROE?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/06/will-oconnors-replacement-overturn-roe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/06/will-oconnors-replacement-overturn-roe/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:09:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: umoxichillin</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/06/will-oconnors-replacement-overturn-roe/comment-page-1/#comment-31100</link>
		<dc:creator>umoxichillin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2616#comment-31100</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;umoxichillin&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>umoxichillin</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bLogicus</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/06/will-oconnors-replacement-overturn-roe/comment-page-1/#comment-31099</link>
		<dc:creator>bLogicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2616#comment-31099</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Abortion Supporters use Urban Legends in Supreme Court Debate&lt;/strong&gt;

Abortion rights extremists continue to propagate myths about the potential impact of a conservative replacement for Supreme Court justice Sandra Day O&#039;Connor. Although five of the current justices support the core finding of Roe, abortion rights activi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Abortion Supporters use Urban Legends in Supreme Court Debate</strong></p>
<p>Abortion rights extremists continue to propagate myths about the potential impact of a conservative replacement for Supreme Court justice Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor. Although five of the current justices support the core finding of Roe, abortion rights activi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProLifeBlogs</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/06/will-oconnors-replacement-overturn-roe/comment-page-1/#comment-31098</link>
		<dc:creator>ProLifeBlogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2616#comment-31098</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Abortion Supporters use Urban Legends in Supreme Court Debate&lt;/strong&gt;

Abortion rights extremists continue to propagate myths about the potential impact of a conservative replacement for Supreme Court justice Sandra Day O&#039;Connor. Although five of the current justices support the core finding of Roe, abortion rights activi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Abortion Supporters use Urban Legends in Supreme Court Debate</strong></p>
<p>Abortion rights extremists continue to propagate myths about the potential impact of a conservative replacement for Supreme Court justice Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor. Although five of the current justices support the core finding of Roe, abortion rights activi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizen Journal</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/06/will-oconnors-replacement-overturn-roe/comment-page-1/#comment-31097</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizen Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 19:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2616#comment-31097</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Abortion and the Court&lt;/strong&gt;

William Saletan, writing for Slate, counters what some of his colleagues there believe: that in nominating a SCOTUS justice the President &quot;can&#039;t risk a replay of what happened to his dad. They think he needs to nominate a moderate to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Abortion and the Court</strong></p>
<p>William Saletan, writing for Slate, counters what some of his colleagues there believe: that in nominating a SCOTUS justice the President &#8220;can&#8217;t risk a replay of what happened to his dad. They think he needs to nominate a moderate to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Outpost</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/06/will-oconnors-replacement-overturn-roe/comment-page-1/#comment-31096</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Outpost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 16:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2616#comment-31096</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Thoughts on Roe v. Wade...and the Court vacancy&lt;/strong&gt;

There&#039;s a lot of hand ringing going on in some quarters of the future of Roe, should Bush, as expected/hoped for, nominates a strict constructionist/originalist to the Supreme Court. First, I think it&#039;s useful to point out that one justice...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Thoughts on Roe v. Wade&#8230;and the Court vacancy</strong></p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot of hand ringing going on in some quarters of the future of Roe, should Bush, as expected/hoped for, nominates a strict constructionist/originalist to the Supreme Court. First, I think it&#8217;s useful to point out that one justice&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The American Princess</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/06/will-oconnors-replacement-overturn-roe/comment-page-1/#comment-31095</link>
		<dc:creator>The American Princess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 16:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2616#comment-31095</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Everybody Panic! The People Might Speak!&lt;/strong&gt;

O&#039;Connor wasn&#039;t the swing vote on upholding Roe, but she did stand in the way of something that rattles the very pearls on Nancy Pelosi&#039;s neck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Everybody Panic! The People Might Speak!</strong></p>
<p>O&#8217;Connor wasn&#8217;t the swing vote on upholding Roe, but she did stand in the way of something that rattles the very pearls on Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s neck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico's Pontifications</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/06/will-oconnors-replacement-overturn-roe/comment-page-1/#comment-31094</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico's Pontifications</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 15:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2616#comment-31094</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Smeal Spreads A Deliberate Lie About Roe&lt;/strong&gt;

It may not be much of a news flash, I guess . . . but Feminist Majority president Eleanor Smeal is lying to her supporters about the danger that Justice O&#8217;Connor&#8217;s resignation poses to Roe v. Wade.  I use the word &#8220;lying&#8221; becau...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Smeal Spreads A Deliberate Lie About Roe</strong></p>
<p>It may not be much of a news flash, I guess . . . but Feminist Majority president Eleanor Smeal is lying to her supporters about the danger that Justice O&#8217;Connor&#8217;s resignation poses to Roe v. Wade.  I use the word &#8220;lying&#8221; becau&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Larsonian</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/06/will-oconnors-replacement-overturn-roe/comment-page-1/#comment-31093</link>
		<dc:creator>The Larsonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2616#comment-31093</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Blogosphere Synthesis - July 6&lt;/strong&gt;

Which brings us to Roe v. Wade. Robert P. George argues from a scientific basis that a new, genetically distinct life is created at conception. That this aligns with a religious position is well and good, but not necessary to the argument.

However...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blogosphere Synthesis &#8211; July 6</strong></p>
<p>Which brings us to Roe v. Wade. Robert P. George argues from a scientific basis that a new, genetically distinct life is created at conception. That this aligns with a religious position is well and good, but not necessary to the argument.</p>
<p>However&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Carlton (aka Jack Lewis)</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/06/will-oconnors-replacement-overturn-roe/comment-page-1/#comment-31092</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Carlton (aka Jack Lewis)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2616#comment-31092</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Boxer plays chicken little with false abortion stats&lt;/strong&gt;

From LifeNews: A leading abortion advocate in the Senate has shocked political observers with a claim that thousands of women...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Boxer plays chicken little with false abortion stats</strong></p>
<p>From LifeNews: A leading abortion advocate in the Senate has shocked political observers with a claim that thousands of women&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/06/will-oconnors-replacement-overturn-roe/comment-page-1/#comment-31091</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2616#comment-31091</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Committee warns against hard-line nomination&lt;/strong&gt;

WASHINGTON &#8212; Senate Judiciary Committee members crystallized the debate over Justice Sandra Da</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Committee warns against hard-line nomination</strong></p>
<p>WASHINGTON &#8212; Senate Judiciary Committee members crystallized the debate over Justice Sandra Da</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
