<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCOTUS WATCH: THE GONZALES PROBLEM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/08/scotus-watch-the-gonzales-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/08/scotus-watch-the-gonzales-problem/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:38:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alprazeoolam</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/08/scotus-watch-the-gonzales-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-31509</link>
		<dc:creator>alprazeoolam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 23:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2643#comment-31509</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alprazeoolam&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alprazeoolam</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Cassandra Page</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/08/scotus-watch-the-gonzales-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-31507</link>
		<dc:creator>The Cassandra Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2005 23:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2643#comment-31507</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rathergate Anniversary - 61 days and counting - a&lt;/strong&gt;

The blog explosion that followed Rathergate makes it possible to achieve even greater things in the blogosphere. The Supreme Court nomination battle . . . . . . . . .

Anita Hill would not have lasted a weekend with the new media on her case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rathergate Anniversary &#8211; 61 days and counting &#8211; a</strong></p>
<p>The blog explosion that followed Rathergate makes it possible to achieve even greater things in the blogosphere. The Supreme Court nomination battle . . . . . . . . .</p>
<p>Anita Hill would not have lasted a weekend with the new media on her case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Outpost</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/08/scotus-watch-the-gonzales-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-31506</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Outpost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2005 17:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2643#comment-31506</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Saturday roundup&lt;/strong&gt;

Volokh creates a &quot;fill in the blank&quot; editorial re: the Supreme Court...(works for libs and conservatives)...and doesn&#039;t think there&#039;s much political gain to be made w/SCOTUS appointments...at least in terms of the &quot;reaching out&quot; theory, (ie. to women w...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Saturday roundup</strong></p>
<p>Volokh creates a &#8220;fill in the blank&#8221; editorial re: the Supreme Court&#8230;(works for libs and conservatives)&#8230;and doesn&#8217;t think there&#8217;s much political gain to be made w/SCOTUS appointments&#8230;at least in terms of the &#8220;reaching out&#8221; theory, (ie. to women w&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TriggerFinger</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/08/scotus-watch-the-gonzales-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-31505</link>
		<dc:creator>TriggerFinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2005 04:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2643#comment-31505</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Just say no to Gonzales.&lt;/strong&gt;

Just say no to Gonzales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Just say no to Gonzales.</strong></p>
<p>Just say no to Gonzales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Our Way of Life</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/08/scotus-watch-the-gonzales-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-31504</link>
		<dc:creator>Our Way of Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2005 02:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2643#comment-31504</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Supreme Court Update&lt;/strong&gt;

Michelle Malkin has the news on the Rehnquist watch. It looks like Bush will have two vacancies to fill, which was kind of expected.
 
The rather obvious danger here is that Bush will appoint one solid conservative, and then a 1/2 conservative whic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Supreme Court Update</strong></p>
<p>Michelle Malkin has the news on the Rehnquist watch. It looks like Bush will have two vacancies to fill, which was kind of expected.</p>
<p>The rather obvious danger here is that Bush will appoint one solid conservative, and then a 1/2 conservative whic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hyscience</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/08/scotus-watch-the-gonzales-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-31503</link>
		<dc:creator>Hyscience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 22:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2643#comment-31503</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rehnquist To Retire TODAY -- Or Not&lt;/strong&gt;

Novak is wrong and there will be no retirement? Yes, no, maybe - Drudge says yes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rehnquist To Retire TODAY &#8212; Or Not</strong></p>
<p>Novak is wrong and there will be no retirement? Yes, no, maybe &#8211; Drudge says yes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/08/scotus-watch-the-gonzales-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-31502</link>
		<dc:creator>FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 22:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2643#comment-31502</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rehnquist Stepping down? YES - Bush Has TWO Choices for Supreme Court&lt;/strong&gt;

Matt Drudge has a &#8220;Media on standby after growing reports Supreme Court Chief Justice Rehnquist is handing in his resignation&#8230; DEVELOPING&#8230; &#8221;
	Stay tuned.
	In the meantime read this piece about two possible Supreme Court vacan...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rehnquist Stepping down? YES &#8211; Bush Has TWO Choices for Supreme Court</strong></p>
<p>Matt Drudge has a &#8220;Media on standby after growing reports Supreme Court Chief Justice Rehnquist is handing in his resignation&#8230; DEVELOPING&#8230; &#8221;<br />
	Stay tuned.<br />
	In the meantime read this piece about two possible Supreme Court vacan&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Searchlight Crusade</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/08/scotus-watch-the-gonzales-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-31501</link>
		<dc:creator>Searchlight Crusade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 22:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2643#comment-31501</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Today&#039;s links 2005 07 08 Friday&lt;/strong&gt;

Repeat visitors may notice a bit of a new look to the site today.  I&#039;ve moved the categories around a bit, and renamed a few, to emphasize some things and de-emphasize others, but everything is still here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
**********&lt;br /&gt;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Today&#8217;s links 2005 07 08 Friday</strong></p>
<p>Repeat visitors may notice a bit of a new look to the site today.  I&#8217;ve moved the categories around a bit, and renamed a few, to emphasize some things and de-emphasize others, but everything is still here.</p>
<p>**********<br />&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In the Bullpen</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/08/scotus-watch-the-gonzales-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-31500</link>
		<dc:creator>In the Bullpen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 22:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2643#comment-31500</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rhenquist to Retire?&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rhenquist to Retire?</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/08/scotus-watch-the-gonzales-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-31499</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 18:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2643#comment-31499</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dems Want Talks With Bush on Nominees&lt;/strong&gt;

Democrats say the courtesy calls from President Bush and his top aide, while appreciated, fall far s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dems Want Talks With Bush on Nominees</strong></p>
<p>Democrats say the courtesy calls from President Bush and his top aide, while appreciated, fall far s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
