The NY Times echoes what I noted on the 7th, and what many other War on Terror watchdogs have warned about for years: “For a Decade, London Thrived as a Busy Crossroads of Terror.” The Washington Post runs a similar story: “In London, Islamic Radicals Found a Haven.”

Mediacrity takes a closer look at one of the Times’ clueless pieces on the 7/7 attacks by “the feckless Hassan Fattah,” a Hezbollah sympathizer.

More on Londonistan at ICT. (Hat tip: Dan Darling at Winds of Change.) The Telegraph points to a “foreign terror cell:”

Both ministerial and Whitehall officials stressed the similarities between the London attacks and the train bombings in Madrid last year which killed 191 people.

The man believed to be the Madrid mastermind, Mustafa Setmariam Naser, a 47-year-old Syrian with dual Spanish nationality, is said to be “one of many suspects” being hunted by the police and MI5. They also want to question Zeeshan Hyder Siddiqui, 25, a British national allegedly trained to make bombs in an al-Qaeda camp who was arrested in Pakistan in May.

Their search is being hampered because those who planted the bombs are believed to be “cleanskins”, young operatives with no known terrorist links.

The secret services, The Sunday Telegraph understands, picked up no intelligence that could have alerted them to the possibility of attacks on London. There was none of the “chatter” – information picked up by electronic surveillance – or suspicious financial transactions that have helped to thwart other planned attacks.

“We are convinced it is not a British-based cell,” a senior Government source said. There was a strong possibility that the bombers came from Iraq and spent time in mainland Europe before entering Britain recently.

A separate Telegraph article details the continued manhunt:

Two theories have emerged. The first is that the terrorist cell, which calls itself Secret Organisation of the al-Qaeda Jihad in Europe, is composed of British Muslims, unknown to the intelligence services, who have become radicalised by the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and have signed up to the al-Qaeda philosophy that the Western way of life must be destroyed.

On this hypothesis, the group is small in number, less than 20 but more than 12, and composed of educated men and women in their late twenties and early thirties.

It is highly likely that they are being lead by a seasoned terrorist, possibly from outside Britain, who is capable of obtaining commercial or military explosives and making small but lethal bombs, and has a record of past success in co-ordinating attacks.

The second and more likely theory, The Sunday Telegraph has learned, which has been presented to ministers during their daily Cobra anti-terror committee briefings, is that the terrorists are from abroad – either Europe or North Africa – and entered Britain during the past six months with false passports.

Steve Emerson reported on the North Africa theory on MSNBC at at The Counterterrorism Blog here.

The Sunday Times of Britain has a piece on al Qaeda recruitment in Britain.

Michael Cutler at the invaluable Counterterrorism Blog draws implication for U.S. homeland security, hitting many of the same points I’ve made previously about the Visa Waiver Program and the Transit Without a Visa program.

Jihad Watch points to the latest Islamist group claiming credit for 7/7

Daniel Pipes reports on the Islamist British group called Al-Muhajiroun.

Bryan Preston with more on immigration, assimilation and the London attacks at TIB.

***
Update:

Marc Landers on a possible Finsbury mosque connection.

***
Previous:

The 7/7 attacks: Who did it?
The 7/7 attacks: Who did it? Pt II
The 7/7 attacks: Britain’s breeding ground for suicide bombers

comments (0)   trackbacks (3)