<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WHAT TOM TANCREDO SHOULD HAVE SAID</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/18/what-tom-tancredo-should-have-said/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/18/what-tom-tancredo-should-have-said/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:59:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Politically Incorrect</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/18/what-tom-tancredo-should-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-32311</link>
		<dc:creator>Politically Incorrect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 14:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2726#comment-32311</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Tom Tancredo - Amerikas &quot;Anti-Immigration-Crusader&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;

Die US-Präsidentschaftswahlen 2008 werfen schon jetzt ihren Schatten voraus. In beiden Lagern, bei Demokraten und bei Republikanern, steigen in regelmäßigen Abständen neue Politiker in das Rennen um die Präsidentschaftskandidatur ein....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tom Tancredo &#8211; Amerikas &#8220;Anti-Immigration-Crusader&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>Die US-Präsidentschaftswahlen 2008 werfen schon jetzt ihren Schatten voraus. In beiden Lagern, bei Demokraten und bei Republikanern, steigen in regelmäßigen Abständen neue Politiker in das Rennen um die Präsidentschaftskandidatur ein&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neolibertarian</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/18/what-tom-tancredo-should-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-32309</link>
		<dc:creator>Neolibertarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 08:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2726#comment-32309</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Tom Tancredo: Nuke Mecca&lt;/strong&gt;

link (tip to Malkin and the Captain)&lt;br /&gt;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tom Tancredo: Nuke Mecca</strong></p>
<p>link (tip to Malkin and the Captain)<br />&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JunkYardBlog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/18/what-tom-tancredo-should-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-32308</link>
		<dc:creator>JunkYardBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2726#comment-32308</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;RATIONAL RESPONSE TO THE UNTHINKABLE&lt;/strong&gt;

The first time his subjects heard his voice, it was when he addressed them by radio to announce his government&#039;s unconditional surrender to a foreign power. In his name, the government of his country had waged a vicious and bitter...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>RATIONAL RESPONSE TO THE UNTHINKABLE</strong></p>
<p>The first time his subjects heard his voice, it was when he addressed them by radio to announce his government&#8217;s unconditional surrender to a foreign power. In his name, the government of his country had waged a vicious and bitter&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Pink Flamingo Bar Grill</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/18/what-tom-tancredo-should-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-32307</link>
		<dc:creator>The Pink Flamingo Bar Grill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2726#comment-32307</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hugh Hewitt takes the Norquist definition of Islam&lt;/strong&gt;

When do they get upset about this hijacking of their religion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hugh Hewitt takes the Norquist definition of Islam</strong></p>
<p>When do they get upset about this hijacking of their religion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Pink Flamingo Bar Grill</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/18/what-tom-tancredo-should-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-32306</link>
		<dc:creator>The Pink Flamingo Bar Grill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2726#comment-32306</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hugh Hewitt takes the Norquist definition of Islam&lt;/strong&gt;

When do they get upset about this hijacking of their religion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hugh Hewitt takes the Norquist definition of Islam</strong></p>
<p>When do they get upset about this hijacking of their religion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beltway Blogroll</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/18/what-tom-tancredo-should-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-32305</link>
		<dc:creator>Beltway Blogroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2726#comment-32305</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;In The Blog&#039;s-Eye: Rep. Tancredo Goes Nuclear&lt;/strong&gt;

&quot;Tancredo&quot; recently soared to near the top of the search terms at Technorati.com, a search engine for blogs. At one point July 19, the name ranked third, just one notch below &quot;Karl Rove&quot; and one above &quot;Harry Potter,&quot; for top...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>In The Blog&#8217;s-Eye: Rep. Tancredo Goes Nuclear</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;Tancredo&#8221; recently soared to near the top of the search terms at Technorati.com, a search engine for blogs. At one point July 19, the name ranked third, just one notch below &#8220;Karl Rove&#8221; and one above &#8220;Harry Potter,&#8221; for top&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Q Speaks</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/18/what-tom-tancredo-should-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-32303</link>
		<dc:creator>The Q Speaks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2726#comment-32303</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Tancredo = moron&lt;/strong&gt;

In case you missed it, Republican Congressman Tom Tancredo of Colorado made some insane remarks early last week. Actually, insane at best, dangerous and irresponsible at worst.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tancredo = moron</strong></p>
<p>In case you missed it, Republican Congressman Tom Tancredo of Colorado made some insane remarks early last week. Actually, insane at best, dangerous and irresponsible at worst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: protein wisdom</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/18/what-tom-tancredo-should-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-32302</link>
		<dc:creator>protein wisdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2726#comment-32302</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ultimate Responses and the Necessity of Pragmatism in the War on Terror&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It occurs to me that I&apos;ve yet to comment on the now infamous (and oft misrepresented) Tom Tancredo remarks &#045;&#045; remarks that a number of rightwing bloggers (as well as just about every blogger on the left side of the &apos;sphere, given t...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ultimate Responses and the Necessity of Pragmatism in the War on Terror</strong></p>
<p>It occurs to me that I&apos;ve yet to comment on the now infamous (and oft misrepresented) Tom Tancredo remarks &#45;&#45; remarks that a number of rightwing bloggers (as well as just about every blogger on the left side of the &apos;sphere, given t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Jawa Report</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/18/what-tom-tancredo-should-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-32301</link>
		<dc:creator>The Jawa Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 03:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2726#comment-32301</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Case for Nuking Mecca as a MAD Strategy&lt;/strong&gt;

I understand that Rep. Tom Tancredo recently said that in the case of a WMD attack against the US by al Qaeda forces we should respond by nuking mecca. Since I have not been watching much TV or reading any...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Case for Nuking Mecca as a MAD Strategy</strong></p>
<p>I understand that Rep. Tom Tancredo recently said that in the case of a WMD attack against the US by al Qaeda forces we should respond by nuking mecca. Since I have not been watching much TV or reading any&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Think Sink</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/18/what-tom-tancredo-should-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-32300</link>
		<dc:creator>Think Sink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 03:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2726#comment-32300</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Why We Fight Terrorists&lt;/strong&gt;

Browsing around Dr. Sanity&#039;s just now (because Stacy told me to), I found her post titled &quot;Thinking The Unthinkable&quot;, about Congressman Tom Tancredo&#039;s off-the-cuff remarks suggesting a nuclear strike at Mecca might be warranted in the wake of a terro...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why We Fight Terrorists</strong></p>
<p>Browsing around Dr. Sanity&#8217;s just now (because Stacy told me to), I found her post titled &#8220;Thinking The Unthinkable&#8221;, about Congressman Tom Tancredo&#8217;s off-the-cuff remarks suggesting a nuclear strike at Mecca might be warranted in the wake of a terro&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cold Fury</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/18/what-tom-tancredo-should-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-32299</link>
		<dc:creator>Cold Fury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 02:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2726#comment-32299</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Blunder ? Hardly.&lt;/strong&gt;

Tom Tancredo&#039;s tell-it-like-it-is statement on the real nuclear option is catching some heat. baldilocks and Michelle provide some much-needed perspective to some of the overblown rhetoric floating &#039;round the sphere.

Speaking of which, I&#039;d like to m...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blunder ? Hardly.</strong></p>
<p>Tom Tancredo&#8217;s tell-it-like-it-is statement on the real nuclear option is catching some heat. baldilocks and Michelle provide some much-needed perspective to some of the overblown rhetoric floating &#8217;round the sphere.</p>
<p>Speaking of which, I&#8217;d like to m&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lump on a Blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/18/what-tom-tancredo-should-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-32298</link>
		<dc:creator>Lump on a Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 01:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2726#comment-32298</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Open Challenge to the Detractors of Rep. Tom Tancredo&lt;/strong&gt;

For those who counsel a restrained response I have to ask myself:  Would they feel the same way if they awoke tomorrow to country in ruins, on the verge of anarchy; a collapsed economy; one million dead, and their own lives and the lives of their chil...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Open Challenge to the Detractors of Rep. Tom Tancredo</strong></p>
<p>For those who counsel a restrained response I have to ask myself:  Would they feel the same way if they awoke tomorrow to country in ruins, on the verge of anarchy; a collapsed economy; one million dead, and their own lives and the lives of their chil&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThoughtsOnline</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/18/what-tom-tancredo-should-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-32297</link>
		<dc:creator>ThoughtsOnline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 00:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2726#comment-32297</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Defending Tancredo&lt;/strong&gt;

Maybe... all Tancredo was doing was promising the American people that, should the unthinkable happen, if he had his way, we would get our payback.... and we&#039;d end the war. A bit late. But we&#039;d end it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Defending Tancredo</strong></p>
<p>Maybe&#8230; all Tancredo was doing was promising the American people that, should the unthinkable happen, if he had his way, we would get our payback&#8230;. and we&#8217;d end the war. A bit late. But we&#8217;d end it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace of Spades HQ</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/18/what-tom-tancredo-should-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-32296</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace of Spades HQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 19:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2726#comment-32296</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Tom Tancredo: Nuke Mecca&lt;/strong&gt;

The responsible and acceptable thing to do is to say these remarks were at best unwise, and at worse needlessly provocative and counterproductive. And also, stupid. So I&#039;ll say that. But: Look, let&#039;s be real. During our long nuclear standoff...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tom Tancredo: Nuke Mecca</strong></p>
<p>The responsible and acceptable thing to do is to say these remarks were at best unwise, and at worse needlessly provocative and counterproductive. And also, stupid. So I&#8217;ll say that. But: Look, let&#8217;s be real. During our long nuclear standoff&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beltway Blogroll</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/18/what-tom-tancredo-should-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-32295</link>
		<dc:creator>Beltway Blogroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 19:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2726#comment-32295</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;In The Blog&#039;s-Eye: Tancredo Goes Nuclear&lt;/strong&gt;

&quot;Tancredo&quot; has soared to near the top of the search terms at Technorati.com, a search engine for blogs. It&#039;s now just one notch below &quot;Karl Rove&quot; and one above &quot;Harry Potter.&quot; The reason: Rep. Tom Tancredo suggested that a terrorist...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>In The Blog&#8217;s-Eye: Tancredo Goes Nuclear</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;Tancredo&#8221; has soared to near the top of the search terms at Technorati.com, a search engine for blogs. It&#8217;s now just one notch below &#8220;Karl Rove&#8221; and one above &#8220;Harry Potter.&#8221; The reason: Rep. Tom Tancredo suggested that a terrorist&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

