<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCOTUS WATCH: CLEMENT FILES</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/19/scotus-watch-clement-files/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/19/scotus-watch-clement-files/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:35:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: desktop strippers</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/19/scotus-watch-clement-files/comment-page-1/#comment-32389</link>
		<dc:creator>desktop strippers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2734#comment-32389</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;desktop strippers&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://wapurl.co.uk/?O2IM7WI&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;desktop strippers&lt;/a&gt; VG001283724</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>desktop strippers</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://wapurl.co.uk/?O2IM7WI" rel="nofollow">desktop strippers</a> VG001283724</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aimmbien</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/19/scotus-watch-clement-files/comment-page-1/#comment-32388</link>
		<dc:creator>aimmbien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 21:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2734#comment-32388</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;aimmbien&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>aimmbien</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flynn Files</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/19/scotus-watch-clement-files/comment-page-1/#comment-32387</link>
		<dc:creator>Flynn Files</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 00:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2734#comment-32387</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;John Roberts, Supreme Court Nominee&lt;/strong&gt;

President Bush announced his nomination of John Roberts for the Supreme Court of the United States this evening. Roberts worked for William French Smith in the Reagan administration, clerked for Justice William Rehnquist, and argued 39 cases before the...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>John Roberts, Supreme Court Nominee</strong></p>
<p>President Bush announced his nomination of John Roberts for the Supreme Court of the United States this evening. Roberts worked for William French Smith in the Reagan administration, clerked for Justice William Rehnquist, and argued 39 cases before the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flynn Files</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/19/scotus-watch-clement-files/comment-page-1/#comment-32386</link>
		<dc:creator>Flynn Files</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 03:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2734#comment-32386</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;John Roberts, Supreme Court Nominee&lt;/strong&gt;

President Bush announced his nomination of John Roberts for the Supreme Court of the United States this evening. Roberts worked for William French Smith in the Reagan administration, clerked for Justice William Rehnquist, and argued 39 cases before the...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>John Roberts, Supreme Court Nominee</strong></p>
<p>President Bush announced his nomination of John Roberts for the Supreme Court of the United States this evening. Roberts worked for William French Smith in the Reagan administration, clerked for Justice William Rehnquist, and argued 39 cases before the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balance Sheet</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/19/scotus-watch-clement-files/comment-page-1/#comment-32385</link>
		<dc:creator>Balance Sheet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 02:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2734#comment-32385</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Supreme Court Nominee Announcement&lt;/strong&gt;

All sorts of predictions out there. Clements had a large following and a lot of bets riding on her as Michelle Malkin notes (Tradesports at 62 on Clements). Fox News is reporting it will be John Roberts of the D.C....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Supreme Court Nominee Announcement</strong></p>
<p>All sorts of predictions out there. Clements had a large following and a lot of bets riding on her as Michelle Malkin notes (Tradesports at 62 on Clements). Fox News is reporting it will be John Roberts of the D.C&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gop and the City</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/19/scotus-watch-clement-files/comment-page-1/#comment-32384</link>
		<dc:creator>Gop and the City</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 23:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2734#comment-32384</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Justice Karl Rove&lt;/strong&gt;

Just try to overturn Rove v Wade.

Just kidding...but just imagine the response from the left if it were true. Talk about going nuclear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Justice Karl Rove</strong></p>
<p>Just try to overturn Rove v Wade.</p>
<p>Just kidding&#8230;but just imagine the response from the left if it were true. Talk about going nuclear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Buzz Blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/19/scotus-watch-clement-files/comment-page-1/#comment-32383</link>
		<dc:creator>The Buzz Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 23:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2734#comment-32383</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Supreme Court Mania!&lt;/strong&gt;

The blogosphere is buzzing, Washington is on edge, activists are gearing up for the fight to the death. Meanwhile, the Coalition of The Chillin’ is mobilizing (can people who are chillin&#8217; really mobilize?  ). 
	President Bush will make the ann...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Supreme Court Mania!</strong></p>
<p>The blogosphere is buzzing, Washington is on edge, activists are gearing up for the fight to the death. Meanwhile, the Coalition of The Chillin’ is mobilizing (can people who are chillin&#8217; really mobilize?  ).<br />
	President Bush will make the ann&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Cassandra Page</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/19/scotus-watch-clement-files/comment-page-1/#comment-32382</link>
		<dc:creator>The Cassandra Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 23:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2734#comment-32382</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Judge Edith Clement v. Justice Janice Rogers Brown&lt;/strong&gt;

I am sure we will not notice the difference between today&#039;s Court and the new Court that will convene with Justice Clement seated on the bench this fall (after maybe a token fight in the Senate - the Dems can&#039;t make it too obvious by being unanimous ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Judge Edith Clement v. Justice Janice Rogers Brown</strong></p>
<p>I am sure we will not notice the difference between today&#8217;s Court and the new Court that will convene with Justice Clement seated on the bench this fall (after maybe a token fight in the Senate &#8211; the Dems can&#8217;t make it too obvious by being unanimous &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HARD-TALK</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/19/scotus-watch-clement-files/comment-page-1/#comment-32381</link>
		<dc:creator>HARD-TALK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 22:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2734#comment-32381</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;My choice for the SCOTUS&lt;/strong&gt;

Sorry LIBERALS, it has to be said....Ann is the perfect choice...I mean think about it. Ann&#039;s nomination would drive the left off the edge for good. Justice Ann Coulter...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>My choice for the SCOTUS</strong></p>
<p>Sorry LIBERALS, it has to be said&#8230;.Ann is the perfect choice&#8230;I mean think about it. Ann&#8217;s nomination would drive the left off the edge for good. Justice Ann Coulter&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OKIE on the LAM™ - In LA</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/19/scotus-watch-clement-files/comment-page-1/#comment-32380</link>
		<dc:creator>OKIE on the LAM™ - In LA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 22:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2734#comment-32380</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SCOTUS Watch -- Tonight We&#039;ll Know&lt;/strong&gt;

At 9 PM EST tonight President George Bush will announce his nominee to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O&#039;Connell. Early bets have been on Fifth Circuit Justice Edith (Joy) Clement, but the buzz is getting stronger about another &quot;Edith...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SCOTUS Watch &#8212; Tonight We&#8217;ll Know</strong></p>
<p>At 9 PM EST tonight President George Bush will announce his nominee to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O&#8217;Connell. Early bets have been on Fifth Circuit Justice Edith (Joy) Clement, but the buzz is getting stronger about another &#8220;Edith&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bRight &#38; Early</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/19/scotus-watch-clement-files/comment-page-1/#comment-32379</link>
		<dc:creator>bRight &#38; Early</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 21:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2734#comment-32379</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;New News&lt;/strong&gt;

Surely any blog reader who has been online at all this morning knows that President Bush will announce his nominee to the SCOTUS seat being vacated by Sandra Day O&#8217;Conner this evening. Or as Captain Ed headlined it, &#8220;Bush To Announce End T...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>New News</strong></p>
<p>Surely any blog reader who has been online at all this morning knows that President Bush will announce his nominee to the SCOTUS seat being vacated by Sandra Day O&#8217;Conner this evening. Or as Captain Ed headlined it, &#8220;Bush To Announce End T&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Web Fantastic</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/19/scotus-watch-clement-files/comment-page-1/#comment-32378</link>
		<dc:creator>The Web Fantastic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 21:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2734#comment-32378</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SCOTUS Picture Sharpens Tonight&lt;/strong&gt;

Is it possible to have a Supreme Court nominee about whom little if anything substantive is, or can be, known? The more salient question is: In the hyperpartisan, zero-sum atmosphere that now consumes Washington, is it possible to have</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SCOTUS Picture Sharpens Tonight</strong></p>
<p>Is it possible to have a Supreme Court nominee about whom little if anything substantive is, or can be, known? The more salient question is: In the hyperpartisan, zero-sum atmosphere that now consumes Washington, is it possible to have</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The LLama Butchers</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/19/scotus-watch-clement-files/comment-page-1/#comment-32377</link>
		<dc:creator>The LLama Butchers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 21:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2734#comment-32377</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SCOTUS-Watch&lt;/strong&gt;

UP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SCOTUS-Watch</strong></p>
<p>UP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/19/scotus-watch-clement-files/comment-page-1/#comment-32376</link>
		<dc:creator>Macmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 20:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2734#comment-32376</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Anticipation - &quot;Are we there yet?&quot; UPDATED - We&#039;r&lt;/strong&gt;

UP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Anticipation &#8211; &#8220;Are we there yet?&#8221; UPDATED &#8211; We&#8217;r</strong></p>
<p>UP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Art of the Blog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/19/scotus-watch-clement-files/comment-page-1/#comment-32375</link>
		<dc:creator>The Art of the Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 20:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2734#comment-32375</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SCOTUS Watch - Jones or Clement?&lt;/strong&gt;

Confirm Them and RedState.org have a cross-posted entry reading thusly: Something has happened in the past ten minutes. I’ve had three five (they keep IM’ing) people from the media and conservative think tanks IM to say we’re on a wild...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SCOTUS Watch &#8211; Jones or Clement?</strong></p>
<p>Confirm Them and RedState.org have a cross-posted entry reading thusly: Something has happened in the past ten minutes. I’ve had three five (they keep IM’ing) people from the media and conservative think tanks IM to say we’re on a wild&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
