<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCOTUS WATCH: ANN WEIGHS IN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/20/scotus-watch-ann-weighs-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/20/scotus-watch-ann-weighs-in/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:15:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ialpruazolam</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/20/scotus-watch-ann-weighs-in/comment-page-1/#comment-32540</link>
		<dc:creator>ialpruazolam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2744#comment-32540</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ialpruazolam&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ialpruazolam</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam's Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/20/scotus-watch-ann-weighs-in/comment-page-1/#comment-32539</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam's Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2744#comment-32539</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Conservatives Call for Caution on Court Confirmation&lt;/strong&gt;

As mentioned earlier, Ann Coulter has noted that the lack of public knowledge about the Roberts nomination parallels the &quot;stealth&quot; candidacy of the Souter nomination. She addresses some of the supporting arguments made for Roberts and warns that histor...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Conservatives Call for Caution on Court Confirmation</strong></p>
<p>As mentioned earlier, Ann Coulter has noted that the lack of public knowledge about the Roberts nomination parallels the &#8220;stealth&#8221; candidacy of the Souter nomination. She addresses some of the supporting arguments made for Roberts and warns that histor&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark My Words</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/20/scotus-watch-ann-weighs-in/comment-page-1/#comment-32538</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark My Words</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2005 04:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2744#comment-32538</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Let the games begin&lt;/strong&gt;

Well, we now have a Supreme Court nomination, John Roberts of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. For some, on the hysterical left, he is guaranteed to overturn Roe vs. Wade. Others, on the right, are not so sure; in fact, some think we are risking an...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Let the games begin</strong></p>
<p>Well, we now have a Supreme Court nomination, John Roberts of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. For some, on the hysterical left, he is guaranteed to overturn Roe vs. Wade. Others, on the right, are not so sure; in fact, some think we are risking an&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GOP Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/20/scotus-watch-ann-weighs-in/comment-page-1/#comment-32537</link>
		<dc:creator>GOP Bloggers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 03:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2744#comment-32537</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Why my $0.02 on Anakin Roberts is more like $1.05 these days&lt;/strong&gt;

My original post drew some ire from my friends like Matt Margolis, John Rothenberg and drew some attention from other major traffic blogs like Andrew Sullivan and Michelle Malkin. I stated at that time I had little basis for my...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why my $0.02 on Anakin Roberts is more like $1.05 these days</strong></p>
<p>My original post drew some ire from my friends like Matt Margolis, John Rothenberg and drew some attention from other major traffic blogs like Andrew Sullivan and Michelle Malkin. I stated at that time I had little basis for my&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WILLisms.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/20/scotus-watch-ann-weighs-in/comment-page-1/#comment-32536</link>
		<dc:creator>WILLisms.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 22:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2744#comment-32536</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;John Roberts: The Political Contribution Record.&lt;/strong&gt;

Some conservatives (here, here, here, here, here and here) are worried that John Roberts will become another David Souter (a consistently liberal vote). One can understand their concerns, but most of the evidence seems to indicate that Roberts is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>John Roberts: The Political Contribution Record.</strong></p>
<p>Some conservatives (here, here, here, here, here and here) are worried that John Roberts will become another David Souter (a consistently liberal vote). One can understand their concerns, but most of the evidence seems to indicate that Roberts is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WILLisms.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/20/scotus-watch-ann-weighs-in/comment-page-1/#comment-32535</link>
		<dc:creator>WILLisms.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2744#comment-32535</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;John Roberts: The Political Contribution Record.&lt;/strong&gt;

Some conservatives (here, here, here, here, here and here) are worried that John Roberts will become another David Souter (a consistently liberal vote). One can understand their concerns, but most of the evidence seems to indicate that Roberts is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>John Roberts: The Political Contribution Record.</strong></p>
<p>Some conservatives (here, here, here, here, here and here) are worried that John Roberts will become another David Souter (a consistently liberal vote). One can understand their concerns, but most of the evidence seems to indicate that Roberts is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Carlton: codenamed  "Jack Lewis"</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/20/scotus-watch-ann-weighs-in/comment-page-1/#comment-32534</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Carlton: codenamed  "Jack Lewis"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2744#comment-32534</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ann Coulter v. John Roberts&lt;/strong&gt;

From Ann&#039;s site: After pretending to consider various women and minorities for the Supreme Court these past few weeks, President...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ann Coulter v. John Roberts</strong></p>
<p>From Ann&#8217;s site: After pretending to consider various women and minorities for the Supreme Court these past few weeks, President&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myopic Zeal</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/20/scotus-watch-ann-weighs-in/comment-page-1/#comment-32533</link>
		<dc:creator>Myopic Zeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2744#comment-32533</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Is Ann Coulter Triangulating on Roberts?&lt;/strong&gt;

The Power Line guys think Coulter is dead wrong in her commentary.
	Ann is just wrong about this one. Frankly, it&#8217;s hard to believe she&#8217;s serious. Calling John Roberts a &#8220;stealth&#8221; candidate is ridiculous; he has been on everyon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Is Ann Coulter Triangulating on Roberts?</strong></p>
<p>The Power Line guys think Coulter is dead wrong in her commentary.<br />
	Ann is just wrong about this one. Frankly, it&#8217;s hard to believe she&#8217;s serious. Calling John Roberts a &#8220;stealth&#8221; candidate is ridiculous; he has been on everyon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Wild Duck</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/20/scotus-watch-ann-weighs-in/comment-page-1/#comment-32532</link>
		<dc:creator>The Wild Duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 03:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2744#comment-32532</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ann Coulter Is the Terrell Owens of the Right Wing Team&lt;/strong&gt;

There&#8217;s no question that Ann Coulter is one of the stars of a &#8220;Super Bowl&#8221; winning team&#8230;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ann Coulter Is the Terrell Owens of the Right Wing Team</strong></p>
<p>There&#8217;s no question that Ann Coulter is one of the stars of a &#8220;Super Bowl&#8221; winning team&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les Enfants Terrible</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/20/scotus-watch-ann-weighs-in/comment-page-1/#comment-32531</link>
		<dc:creator>Les Enfants Terrible</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 01:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2744#comment-32531</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Schumer Advocates Disbanding Congress&lt;/strong&gt;

The quote is instructive not only to the understanding that liberals have about the role of the Supreme Court, but also to their intention with the Supreme Court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Schumer Advocates Disbanding Congress</strong></p>
<p>The quote is instructive not only to the understanding that liberals have about the role of the Supreme Court, but also to their intention with the Supreme Court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iowa Voice</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/20/scotus-watch-ann-weighs-in/comment-page-1/#comment-32530</link>
		<dc:creator>Iowa Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2744#comment-32530</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ann Coulter Thinks Roberts A Mistake&lt;/strong&gt;

While I have the highest regard for Ann Coulter (she&#039;s funny, and usually right), this time I think she&#039;s on the wrong side of the fence regarding Bush&#039;s nomination of John Roberts to the Supreme Court.

Coulter, in her recent article, wrote:

After p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ann Coulter Thinks Roberts A Mistake</strong></p>
<p>While I have the highest regard for Ann Coulter (she&#8217;s funny, and usually right), this time I think she&#8217;s on the wrong side of the fence regarding Bush&#8217;s nomination of John Roberts to the Supreme Court.</p>
<p>Coulter, in her recent article, wrote:</p>
<p>After p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProLifeBlogs</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/20/scotus-watch-ann-weighs-in/comment-page-1/#comment-32529</link>
		<dc:creator>ProLifeBlogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2744#comment-32529</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Supreme Court Nominee Roberts Position on Abortion is Unknown&lt;/strong&gt;

Despite the accolades of pro-life organizations and the opposition by abortion rights extremists, the position of Supreme Court nominee John Roberts on abortion and the landmark Roe v. Wade decision is unknown. In fact, his record related to abortion i...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Supreme Court Nominee Roberts Position on Abortion is Unknown</strong></p>
<p>Despite the accolades of pro-life organizations and the opposition by abortion rights extremists, the position of Supreme Court nominee John Roberts on abortion and the landmark Roe v. Wade decision is unknown. In fact, his record related to abortion i&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PAXALLES</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/20/scotus-watch-ann-weighs-in/comment-page-1/#comment-32528</link>
		<dc:creator>PAXALLES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2744#comment-32528</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;http://paxalles.blogs.com/paxalles/2005/07/_roberts_cathol.html&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Roberts Catholicism a Bad Prospect According to the American Prospect&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a letter from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.catholicleague.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Catholic League&lt;/a&gt;, 
  it is noted that Adele Stan of the American Prospect online magazine has taken 
  iss...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://paxalles.blogs.com/paxalles/2005/07/_roberts_cathol.html" rel="nofollow">http://paxalles.blogs.com/paxalles/2005/07/_roberts_cathol.html</a></strong></p>
<p>Roberts Catholicism a Bad Prospect According to the American Prospect</p>
<p>In a letter from the <a href="http://www.catholicleague.org" rel="nofollow">Catholic League</a>,<br />
  it is noted that Adele Stan of the American Prospect online magazine has taken<br />
  iss&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The LLama Butchers</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/20/scotus-watch-ann-weighs-in/comment-page-1/#comment-32527</link>
		<dc:creator>The LLama Butchers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 22:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2744#comment-32527</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Why Is John Roberts Smiling?&lt;/strong&gt;

Pep knows. UP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why Is John Roberts Smiling?</strong></p>
<p>Pep knows. UP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoshBritton.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/07/20/scotus-watch-ann-weighs-in/comment-page-1/#comment-32526</link>
		<dc:creator>JoshBritton.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 20:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2744#comment-32526</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Midday roundup&lt;/strong&gt;

Much as the time has passed for Senate Democrats to &quot;consult&quot; with the president regarding his Supreme Court pick, the time has also passed for conservatives to loudly complain about John Roberts. There has been some dissatisfaction scattered here and ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Midday roundup</strong></p>
<p>Much as the time has passed for Senate Democrats to &#8220;consult&#8221; with the president regarding his Supreme Court pick, the time has also passed for conservatives to loudly complain about John Roberts. There has been some dissatisfaction scattered here and &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
