WASHINGTON POST SINKS TO A NEW LOW
Time and again, Washington Post Style reporter Robin Givhan hides behind fashion snarking and culture reporting to savage conservatives. She did it with Katherine Harris and Dick Cheney and John Bolton–and I’m sure you can remember many more examples of partisan mockery.
Well, today’s conservative-bashing Style commentary sinks to the lowest low. The piece, “An Image A Little Too Carefully Coordinated,” attacks the wife and children of SCOTUS nominee John Roberts for the neatness of their clothes:
It has been a long time since so much syrupy nostalgia has been in evidence at the White House. But Tuesday night, when President Bush announced his choice for the next associate justice of the Supreme Court, it was hard not to marvel at the 1950s-style tableau vivant that was John Roberts and his family.
There they were — John, Jane, Josie and Jack — standing with the president and before the entire country. The nominee was in a sober suit with the expected white shirt and red tie. His wife and children stood before the cameras, groomed and glossy in pastel hues — like a trio of Easter eggs, a handful of Jelly Bellies, three little Necco wafers…
For God’s sake, a mother and her children just wanted to look nice for the most historic moment in her husband and their daddy’s life–and the Style attack dogs turn it into an opportunity to sneer at and dump on a loving family. Read the whole thing if you can stomach it.
I guess Givhan and her Style editors would have been happier if Mrs. Roberts dressed more like Alexandra Kerry and the children were outfitted in more modern-day wear.
Jerks.
Want to give your two cents to the Post’s ombudsman?
E-mail ombudsman@washpost.com or phone 202-334-7582.
Update: Captain Ed agrees.
Meanwhile, Charmaine Yoest looks at the latest attack on SCOTUS nominee John Roberts’ sexuality. (Update: The “closet gay” meme is spreading in the swamps.)
And related: The Anchoress and Betsy Newmark double-team against liberal slime.
Update: Dirty Harry wades into the New York Times’ slime.
And Mary Katherine Ham is fired up.
John at Wuzzadem spoofs: The latest in liberal fashion
More! Matthew Hoy takes on Robin Givhan’s fashion (non)sense–illustrated.
***
Previous:
The son, the smirk, the sickos
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Supreme Court to Decide Arizona Immigration Law
December 12, 2011 01:18 PM by Doug Powers
57 CommentsNancy Pelosi: The Obamacare SCOTUS Arguments Should Be Transparent (Now That the Bill Has Been Written, Passed and Implemented)
November 16, 2011 08:51 PM by Doug Powers
47 CommentsDocument drop: C-SPAN asks Supreme Court to open Obamacare oral arguments to cameras
November 15, 2011 04:37 PM by Michelle Malkin
49 CommentsObamacare Arrives at the Supreme Court; Update: Court Announces They’ll Hear Case This Term
November 13, 2011 03:42 PM by Doug Powers
158 CommentsIndiana Supreme Court: Resisting an Unlawful Entry Into Your Home is… Unlawful
May 14, 2011 01:03 PM by Doug Powers
148 CommentsWhite House Tells Supreme Court to Stay Away from Obamacare
March 15, 2011 09:38 AM by Doug Powers
130 CommentsIntroducing the New Self-Appointed Director of Civility in Political Discourse
January 29, 2011 01:27 PM by Doug Powers
54 CommentsWaPo Columnist: The Constitution is Impossible to Understand Because It’s Over 100 Years Old
December 30, 2010 02:04 PM by Doug Powers
90 Comments
Categories: Dick Cheney,John Roberts,Supreme Court,Washington Post
Patterico
» NYT hails the safety net: Poor hardest hit
JustOneMinute
» I Guess I'm Still Stuck On Stupid
Gateway Pundit
» White House Says They Won’t Budge on HHS Birth Control Mandate: “Our Position Is Clear” (Video)

Gateway Pundit
» Sarah Palin on HBO Palin Movie: I’ve Created More Impersonators Than Obama’s Created Jobs (Video)
Weekly Standard
» ‘No Precedent for the Government Ordering Private Companies to Offer a Product for Free’
Riehl World View
» Whitney Houston: If I should stay I would only be in your way
Patterico
» Rick Santorum and the two playbooks










See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.