<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: KATHERINE HARRIS VS. THE PHOTO DOCTORS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/08/04/katherine-harris-vs-the-photo-doctors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/08/04/katherine-harris-vs-the-photo-doctors/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:26:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Electric Venom</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/08/04/katherine-harris-vs-the-photo-doctors/comment-page-1/#comment-33690</link>
		<dc:creator>Electric Venom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 23:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2842#comment-33690</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Smoke and Mirrors&lt;/strong&gt;

Once - just once - I&#8217;d like to see hard-core MSM coverage of Katherine Harris and her political positions without the accompanying sideshow of media manipulation.

The latest, of course, is Harris&#8217;s claim that the MSM has doctored her pho...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Smoke and Mirrors</strong></p>
<p>Once &#8211; just once &#8211; I&#8217;d like to see hard-core MSM coverage of Katherine Harris and her political positions without the accompanying sideshow of media manipulation.</p>
<p>The latest, of course, is Harris&#8217;s claim that the MSM has doctored her pho&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Driscoll.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/08/04/katherine-harris-vs-the-photo-doctors/comment-page-1/#comment-33689</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Driscoll.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 19:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2842#comment-33689</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Camera Doesn&#039;t Lie--Except When It Does&lt;/strong&gt;

Michelle Malkin uses Kathrine Harris&#039;s complaints that photos of her during the conclusion of the 2000 presidential election were digitally manipulated by the news media, to look at its long history of altering photos. And as Jonah Goldberg noted a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Camera Doesn&#8217;t Lie&#8211;Except When It Does</strong></p>
<p>Michelle Malkin uses Kathrine Harris&#8217;s complaints that photos of her during the conclusion of the 2000 presidential election were digitally manipulated by the news media, to look at its long history of altering photos. And as Jonah Goldberg noted a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Carlton: codenamed  "Jack Lewis"</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/08/04/katherine-harris-vs-the-photo-doctors/comment-page-1/#comment-33688</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Carlton: codenamed  "Jack Lewis"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 18:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2842#comment-33688</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Robert Novak suspended from CNN&lt;/strong&gt;

From AZCentral.com... CNN suspended commentator Robert Novak indefinitely after he swore and walked off the set Thursday during a debate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Robert Novak suspended from CNN</strong></p>
<p>From AZCentral.com&#8230; CNN suspended commentator Robert Novak indefinitely after he swore and walked off the set Thursday during a debate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plains Feeder</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/08/04/katherine-harris-vs-the-photo-doctors/comment-page-1/#comment-33687</link>
		<dc:creator>Plains Feeder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 16:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2842#comment-33687</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Distorting Her Makeup&lt;/strong&gt;

Now if I wanted to make Ms. Harris look garishly made-up....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Distorting Her Makeup</strong></p>
<p>Now if I wanted to make Ms. Harris look garishly made-up&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gop and the City</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/08/04/katherine-harris-vs-the-photo-doctors/comment-page-1/#comment-33686</link>
		<dc:creator>Gop and the City</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 15:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2842#comment-33686</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Worst Case of Photoshopping, ever&lt;/strong&gt;

Democratic mayoral hopeful C. Virginia Fields was caught using a doctored photo in a piece of campaign literature last week. She had her own photoshop contest and added in an Asian couple over the bodies of a white couple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Worst Case of Photoshopping, ever</strong></p>
<p>Democratic mayoral hopeful C. Virginia Fields was caught using a doctored photo in a piece of campaign literature last week. She had her own photoshop contest and added in an Asian couple over the bodies of a white couple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron's cc:</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/08/04/katherine-harris-vs-the-photo-doctors/comment-page-1/#comment-33685</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron's cc:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 09:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2842#comment-33685</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Katherine Harris and Liberal Photo Distortion&lt;/strong&gt;

Michelle Malkin blogs the Katherine Harris photo alteration.
	We need to add the recent Ann Coulter Time cover example.  Michelle DID note the distortion earlier, as well as noting how the liberal media digitally enhances its icons (see Update V in th...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Katherine Harris and Liberal Photo Distortion</strong></p>
<p>Michelle Malkin blogs the Katherine Harris photo alteration.<br />
	We need to add the recent Ann Coulter Time cover example.  Michelle DID note the distortion earlier, as well as noting how the liberal media digitally enhances its icons (see Update V in th&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TulsaTime</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/08/04/katherine-harris-vs-the-photo-doctors/comment-page-1/#comment-33684</link>
		<dc:creator>TulsaTime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 02:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2842#comment-33684</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Photoshop and the casual male&lt;/strong&gt;

Photoshop and the casual male</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Photoshop and the casual male</strong></p>
<p>Photoshop and the casual male</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WuzzaDem</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/08/04/katherine-harris-vs-the-photo-doctors/comment-page-1/#comment-33683</link>
		<dc:creator>WuzzaDem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 02:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2842#comment-33683</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Doctored? You Decide&lt;/strong&gt;

Michelle Malkin says the MSM is crying &#039;foul&#039; in response to Florida GOP Rep. Katherine Harris&#039;s claim that newspapers have doctored photos of her. Harris says that her photographs were distorted to make it look like she was wearing more</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Doctored? You Decide</strong></p>
<p>Michelle Malkin says the MSM is crying &#8216;foul&#8217; in response to Florida GOP Rep. Katherine Harris&#8217;s claim that newspapers have doctored photos of her. Harris says that her photographs were distorted to make it look like she was wearing more</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
