<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: STICKS AND STONES, PT. II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2005/08/04/sticks-and-stones-pt-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/08/04/sticks-and-stones-pt-ii/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:00:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Captain's Quarters</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/08/04/sticks-and-stones-pt-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-33612</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain's Quarters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2837#comment-33612</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Kurtz On Malkin&lt;/strong&gt;

Howard Kurtz profiles Michelle Malkin in today&#039;s Washington Post -- if you&#039;ll forgive my pun -- and, as usual, Kurtz writes a balanced and interesting article on one of the most intriguing New Media figures. The portrait of a committed,...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kurtz On Malkin</strong></p>
<p>Howard Kurtz profiles Michelle Malkin in today&#8217;s Washington Post &#8212; if you&#8217;ll forgive my pun &#8212; and, as usual, Kurtz writes a balanced and interesting article on one of the most intriguing New Media figures. The portrait of a committed,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ambione</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/08/04/sticks-and-stones-pt-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-33611</link>
		<dc:creator>ambione</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2837#comment-33611</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ambione&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ambione</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/08/04/sticks-and-stones-pt-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-33610</link>
		<dc:creator>The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 02:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2837#comment-33610</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sticks and Stones&lt;/strong&gt;

On Michelle Malkin&#039;s website, there are two stories back to back that I thought are really related. First, there is the story of a nut ball set of American lefty protesters deciding that going nude and protesting will somehow affect...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sticks and Stones</strong></p>
<p>On Michelle Malkin&#8217;s website, there are two stories back to back that I thought are really related. First, there is the story of a nut ball set of American lefty protesters deciding that going nude and protesting will somehow affect&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Queen of All Evil</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/08/04/sticks-and-stones-pt-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-33609</link>
		<dc:creator>The Queen of All Evil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 05:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2837#comment-33609</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;I Don&#039;t Have To Be Nice&lt;/strong&gt;

When your caricature (a picture that is deliberately exaggerated to produce a comic or grotesque effect) happens to be 1000 times better looking than</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I Don&#8217;t Have To Be Nice</strong></p>
<p>When your caricature (a picture that is deliberately exaggerated to produce a comic or grotesque effect) happens to be 1000 times better looking than</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://kokonutpundits.blogspot.com/2005/07/us-forces-devises-new-strategy-on.html</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/08/04/sticks-and-stones-pt-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-33608</link>
		<dc:creator>http://kokonutpundits.blogspot.com/2005/07/us-forces-devises-new-strategy-on.html</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 16:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2837#comment-33608</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wolcox and Al Capone: Lost cousins?&lt;/strong&gt;

These hoity toity Vanity Fair writers must use their own caricatures of themselves instead of a photograph? We know why. A caricature of a person does make them look slim and brings about their &quot;best&quot; and prominent features. Michelle Malkin makes a p...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wolcox and Al Capone: Lost cousins?</strong></p>
<p>These hoity toity Vanity Fair writers must use their own caricatures of themselves instead of a photograph? We know why. A caricature of a person does make them look slim and brings about their &#8220;best&#8221; and prominent features. Michelle Malkin makes a p&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hubs and spokes</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2005/08/04/sticks-and-stones-pt-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-33607</link>
		<dc:creator>hubs and spokes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 15:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://v2.michellemalkin.com/?p=2837#comment-33607</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Seriously?&lt;/strong&gt;

In the running for “dumbest story of the year” is this gem: the lefties are convinced that Bush flipped the bird to the press the other day. They even have video. Unfortunately, the video clearly shows Bush giving a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Seriously?</strong></p>
<p>In the running for “dumbest story of the year” is this gem: the lefties are convinced that Bush flipped the bird to the press the other day. They even have video. Unfortunately, the video clearly shows Bush giving a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
