GRAVESTONE INSCRIPTION CONTROVERSY

By Lorie Byrd  •  August 23, 2005 04:13 PM

According to this AP story, there is a bit of controversy over the names of the conflicts that some in Iraq and Afghanistan have died in being included on their tombstones.

Unlike earlier wars, nearly all Arlington National Cemetery gravestones for troops killed in Iraq or Afghanistan are inscribed with the slogan-like operation names the Pentagon selected to promote public support for the conflicts.

Families of fallen soldiers and Marines are being told they have the option to have the government-furnished headstones engraved with “Operation Enduring Freedom” or “Operation Iraqi Freedom” at no extra charge, whether they are buried in Arlington or elsewhere. A mock-up shown to many families includes the operation names.

The vast majority of military gravestones from other eras are inscribed with just the basic, required information: name, rank, military branch, date of death and, if applicable, the war and foreign country in which the person served.

Families are supposed to have final approval over what goes on the tombstones. That hasn’t always happened.

Nadia and Robert McCaffrey, whose son Patrick was killed in Iraq in June 2004, said “Operation Iraqi Freedom” ended up on his government-supplied headstone in Oceanside, Calif., without family approval.

“I was a little taken aback,” Robert McCaffrey said, describing his reaction when he first saw the operation name on Patrick’s tombstone. “They certainly didn’t ask my wife; they didn’t ask me.” He said Patrick’s widow told him she had not been asked either.

“In one way, I feel it’s taking advantage to a small degree,” McCaffrey said. “Patrick did not want to be there, that is a definite fact.”

The owner of the company that has been making gravestones for Arlington and other national cemeteries for nearly two decades is uncomfortable, too.

“It just seems a little brazen that that’s put on stones,” said Jeff Martell, owner of Granite Industries of Vermont. “It seems like it might be connected to politics.”

….Since 1997, the government has been paying for virtually everything inscribed on the gravestones. Before that, families had to pay the gravestone makers separately for any inscription beyond the basics.

It wasn’t until the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 that the department instructed national cemetery directors and funeral homes across the country to advise families of fallen soldiers and Marines that they could have operation names like “Enduring Freedom” or “Iraqi Freedom” included on the headstones.

VA officials say neither the Pentagon nor White House exerted any pressure to get families to include the operation names. They say families always had the option of including information like battle or operation names, but didn’t always know it.

“It’s just the right thing to do and it always has been, but it hasn’t always been followed,” said Dave Schettler, director of the VA’s memorial programs service.

I am sorry, but I just don’t see how this is brazen or a PR move. If anything, wouldn’t the government’s inclusion of the name of the current conflict on a tombstone just draw additional attention to the number of lives lost there? (Link via Lucianne.com)

UPDATE: Brian Closs, a reader commenting at Polipundit , provided the link to this video of Nadia McCaffrey expressing her thoughts on President Bush and against the war, her support for Cindy Sheehan, and talking about how she allowed the media to film her son’s casket coming home.

Posted in: Cindy Sheehan

Add your opinion

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Your afternoon snort-starter

March 19, 2008 01:27 PM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments | 1 Trackback

“Tomany?”

Impeachment Watch: Sheehan/BDS/Truther mob to disrupt Rose Bowl parade

December 29, 2007 11:31 PM by Michelle Malkin

62 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Crashers.

Political indigestion: Another Code Pink hunger strike

August 13, 2007 05:01 AM by Michelle Malkin

30 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Because the last one worked so well.

Impeach-a-palooza comes to Washington

July 23, 2007 10:47 AM by Michelle Malkin

110 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

“If there is no agreement to begin impeachment proceedings by Monday, Sheehan will announce her candidacy challenging Pelosi for election in California’s 8th Congressional District.”

Cindy Sheehan kicked off Daily Kos: “I know a lot of you are hostile towards my candidacy.”

July 12, 2007 02:41 PM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Blue on blue: When peaceniks attack…each other. dKos commenters rate Sheehan a “troll.” Plus: The “Draft Gore” campaign steams ahead…and Hillary’s comin’ to the nutroots Kos convention.

Syria hearts Cindy Sheehan

June 18, 2007 04:33 PM by Michelle Malkin

1 Comments | 1 Trackback

Dictators’ sweetheart.

Farewell to Cindy Sheehan

May 31, 2007 11:19 AM by Michelle Malkin

0 Comments | 2 Trackbacks


Categories: Cindy Sheehan



Pundit & Pundette

» About last night's vote

JustOneMinute

» "Unequivocal"?

Commentary

» Flotsam and Jetsam
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook