MORE CHICKENHAWK TALK
One of the most common charges from the anti-war Left made against those supporting the war is that they are chickenhawks. As I mentioned in a previous post, I have been accused of being one of these on several occassions (I guess because I am not in the military and neither are my five and eight-year-old daughters). Ed Morrisey has a must read post on the subject.
The Left has tried for months now to smear supporters of the war as “chickenhawks”, people who encourage the war but do not want to fight it themselves. On its face, this rejects the entire notion of civilian control over the military and foreign policy. It also assumes a callousness on the part of those who advocate for military action when needed, that men and women somehow hold no value to us as Americans unless they happen to be us. Such personal attacks completely avoid having to argue the merits and disadvantages of military action as opposed to other strategies, reducing the intellectual level of the anti-war advocates to mindless namecalling.
Unfortunately, the Washington Post joins that crowd with a laughable look at recruitment by Terry Neal. Neal deduces that middle-class and wealthy parents, all of whom he assumes vote Republican, go out of their way to keep military recruiters from talking to their kids, which has led to a crisis in recruiting. How does Neal come to that conclusion?
Read the rest to learn how misrepresentations and anecdotal evidence were used to reach Neal’s conclusion. Captain Ed perfectly explains why the chickenhawk argument is “mindless namecalling.”
If the chickenhawk argument (if namecalling can be called an argument) is taken to its logical conclusion, the only way to be certain that chickenhawks did not start and support wars would be to allow only those in the military, or parents of those in the military, to vote for the Commander-In-Chief and for Congress, since they authorize funds for military action. I don’t think those currently doing all the chickenhawk talk would be so happy if that happened. I wonder how many members of the House and Senate would be Republican then?
More on the subject:
When Are All You Pro-War Bush Lovers Going To Enlist?
Betsy Newmark answering the criticism of the Bush twins
Playing “Chickenhawk” from Jonah Goldberg
The Chicken Hawk Argument from New England Republican
The Chickenhawk Slur from John Hawkins
You must be logged in to post a comment.
First Day of 2012 Open Thread & Aspirin-Swapping Roundtable
January 1, 2012 11:45 AM by Doug Powers
235 CommentsReports: Miners trapped in Mullan, Idaho; 6 hospitalized
December 15, 2011 01:34 AM by Michelle Malkin
23 CommentsSports and the sexual abuse of children; Plus: Rick Santorum makes things worse
November 8, 2011 02:29 PM by Michelle Malkin
89 Comments10 years ago: My generation’s bloody wake-up call
September 10, 2011 10:07 PM by Michelle Malkin
44 CommentsHurricane/Tropical Storm Irene Open Thread
August 28, 2011 12:25 PM by Doug Powers
104 CommentsQuake alert: Shake, rattle, and roll!
August 23, 2011 02:03 PM by Michelle Malkin
231 CommentsHappy Mother’s Day!
May 8, 2011 11:07 AM by Doug Powers
57 CommentsChrist the Lord is risen today
April 24, 2011 09:32 AM by Michelle Malkin
100 Comments
Categories: Uncategorized
Babalu Blog
» Greece is Burning
Patterico
» NYT hails the safety net: Poor hardest hit
Daily Caller
» Inside Media Matters: Sources, memos reveal erratic behavior, close coordination with White House and news organizations
Gateway Pundit
» Notre Dame Tells Obama: HHS Mandate Is a ‘Grave Violation of Religious Freedom and Cannot Stand’
AmSpecBlog
» Weekend Political Wrap-Up
JustOneMinute
» I Guess I'm Still Stuck On Stupid
The Hill
» Rep. Ron Paul not conceding Maine vote









Add your opinion
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.