Did You Know...

   

YET ANOTHER KRUGMAN KORRECTION

Share
By Michelle Malkin  •  October 2, 2005 06:53 AM

The New York Times has run yet another correction to columnist Paul Krugman’s numerous errors regarding the recounts in Florida after the 2000 presidential election. These errors were noted by bloggers more than a month ago.

The correction comes in the form of a “Letter From the Editor” by editorial page editor Gail Collins, who acknowledges that Krugman mischaracterized the results of two recount studies, one led by the Miami Herald and the other led by the New York Times:

In describing the results of the ballot study by the group led by The Miami Herald in his column of Aug. 26, Paul Krugman relied on the Herald report, which listed only three hypothetical statewide recounts, two of which went to Al Gore. There was, however, a fourth recount, which would have gone to George W. Bush. In this case, the two stricter-standard recounts went to Mr. Bush. A later study, by a group that included The New York Times, used two methods to count ballots: relying on the judgment of a majority of those examining each ballot, or requiring unanimity. Mr. Gore lost one hypothetical recount on the unanimity basis.

This is the first time these errors have been acknowledged in the print version of the Times.

Although Collins’ letter mentions Krugman’s August 19 column, her correction does not. That column falsely stated:

Two different news media consortiums reviewed Florida’s ballots; both found that a full manual recount would have given the election to Mr. Gore.

The correction to that column incorrectly states that “the results of the 2000 Florida election study by a media consortium led by The Miami Herald… showed Al Gore winning [two out of three] statewide manual recounts.”

Collins’ correction also neglects to mention Krugman’s August 22 column, entitled “Don’t Prettify Our History,” which contains this whopper:

About the evidence regarding a manual recount: in April 2001 a media consortium led by The Miami Herald assessed how various recounts of ”undervotes,” which did not register at all, would have affected the outcome. Two out of three hypothetical statewide counts would have given the election to Mr. Gore.

Given Collins’ professed concern about ensuring the accuracy of archived columns–her letter to readers is entitled “It All Goes on the Permanent Record”–it will be interesting to see if her correction is appended to Krugman’s August 19 and August 22 columns.

***

More blogger reax (hat tip: EU Rota, who has his own feedback):

Tim Worstall

Donald Luskin

And more:

Mediacrity

Decision ’08

Tim Blair

***

Previous:
Krugman’s Correction
The Krugman Correction

blog comments powered by Disqus
~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's Email List:

Enviro-cult strongman Al Gore blames Koch brothers for ‘enforced orthodoxy’ of climate change denialism in GOP

May 13, 2014 07:14 AM by Doug Powers

goreaxelrod

Global warming turns Goracle into Harry Reid

Latest hot trend for saving the planet: Propose throwing ‘climate deniers’ in prison

March 30, 2014 10:49 AM by Doug Powers

pointing

Invasion of the denier snatchers

John Kerry orders U.S. envoys to give top priority to… climate change

March 9, 2014 01:55 PM by Doug Powers

johnkerrysalute

A re-set button for Mother Earth

Great Lakes near 100 percent ice cover; Will Al Gore be relieved, or blame ‘climate crisis’?

March 6, 2014 11:34 AM by Doug Powers

goreendnear

Reality challenges rhetoric


Categories: Al Gore, Enviro-nitwits, global warming

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook